Jump to content

Falcons @ Titans Gameday thread


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

Maybe some of you work like that but it's a projection more than anything else. I enjoy discussing football, and the point I was making is Henry didn't put points on the board and had several chances to do so. By his standards it wasn't a good game running the football. It wasn't taking a shot at him. If anything looking at the stats it shows how good a runner he is that he could have an average game and it be a good one by other RB standards. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

All I care about is the rookie QB looked great and might be the answer long term. I hope he starts the rest of the season and the Titans win the division.    

A number of posters 100% made the argument that we needed to see what we have in Levis before the draft. If he sucked as terribly as some predicted, then OK -- we move on and draft a QB. If he perform

Posted Images

4 hours ago, OilerTitanHybrid said:

Levis' O/U for passing yards was 156.5 , which he surpassed easily.  Also blew away the O/U .5 TD's thrown.

How much money did you make on the end? Didn’t you put a wager down for yards?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mercalius said:

One thing the radio guys brought up this morning.  Levis wasn’t wearing a wristband for the plays yesterday.  We knew he was smart, but that’s still a good sign. 

Did not notice that. Tight. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

It's both. He got what was blocked for him and moved the pile a bit. I promise if you asked him he would say it wasn't a good game for all the reasons I've highlighted. 

 

Rewatching his runs I was too harsh, but correct that he knows he left a lot of yards on the field from shoe string and arm tackles. 

 

Henry was fine yesterday. Not the game to argue he's done imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

These unending Tannehill/Henry debates have us at eachother's throats and swinging at ghosts. @IsntLifeFunny isn't driving an agenda with his Henry takes. He's just being honest. I don't necessarily agree with his conclusions but I don't have to. He's not operating out of bad faith. 

Ole boy tried to act like it wasn't bad faith but that I was some simp looking to make sure I didn't offend the Tannehill crowd too much so I decided to talk about Henry. He's been on that bullshit for awhile now. 

 

In reality what I was saying is that we somehow almost lost that game with our rookie QB throwing 4 TDs. I took it out on Henry, instead of the fucking scrubs/busts because I hold him to an elite standard and in my opinion he knows he missed some big runs to seal the game. Probably went too hard on him, but the notion I would talk shit about Henry when I've been one here pounding the table for him and swatting off detractors like flies is hilarious to me. Russ can fuck right off with that bullshit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Ole boy tried to act like it wasn't bad faith but that I was some simp looking to make sure I didn't offend the Tannehill crowd too much so I decided to talk about Henry. He's been on that bullshit for awhile now. 

 

In reality what I was saying is that we somehow almost lost that game with our rookie QB throwing 4 TDs. I took it out on Henry, instead of the fucking scrubs/busts because I hold him to an elite standard and in my opinion he knows he missed some big runs to seal the game. Probably went too hard on him, but the notion I would talk shit about Henry when I've been one here pounding the table for him and swatting off detractors like flies is hilarious to me. Russ can fuck right off with that bullshit. 


I call it like I see it, especially if a pattern becomes apparent. Could I be wrong, sure. Your intentions are usually decent. As a person that is above caring about status and doesn't care to make allies or enemies as long as arguments are honest... I see a pattern and I call it out. 
 

Never called you a simp... but I also didn't make up the idea that you sometimes play both sides and often swap sides very quickly. That's been many statements from quite a few posters before me.. for a long while.
 

Leaning into an unnecessary / ticky-tacky and previously divisive argument over a player you've "pounded the table for" .... that also seemed a weird time to argue about - preceded by people on the Tannystans side starting to call you out... The timing was suspect. I read these situations as "the Tanny argument is over, now give a little to make peace with the Tannystans. "

 

I do feel you believe Henry didn't have his best game. Fine... but I also still feel you were leaning into that, trying to play the balance in order to try and not be on the 100% receiving end of the mean girls bullshit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...