Jump to content

Whisenhunt to Titans


Cyrus

Fan Excitement Gauge  

123 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about the hire?

    • Whoo-hoo! Full on excitement!
      21
    • Not a bad hire. I'm happy.
      62
    • Meh, could be worse.
      17
    • I wanted someone else but this is ... ok. Slightly bummed.
      12
    • Ugh. I hate this hire. Titans got it wrong again.
      11


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 340
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Anyone who doesn't understand this is a massive upgrade to Munch isn't paying attention.

So about 80% of the forum was happy with the hiring of Whisenhunt...and the guy was a total disaster. Interestingly enough, roughly the same percentage of fans are unhappy with the Mularkey hire.

I think it's a great hire.

Bellicek sucked as a retread. Bet the Pats wished they never hired him. And no, nobody can say that they thought Bellichek was going to be great after he failed in Cleveland.

Wiz makes sense to me.

Whether he will be great or not is very much a question. But for me, this is as good of a hire as we were likely to make and now no one can say that we have just stayed in the Fisher tree.

Things will be different in Nashville. Better? Not sure. Worse? Not sure. Different? Absolutely.

For the last time, Belichick did not fail in Cleveland. I have no idea was the media perpetuates this myth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Refer to my earlier post.

 

Transformed a very bad SD offense into a very good one (top 5) with a bunch of spare parts and a very good rookie in Keenan Allen.

I think the best thing he has done is turn Philip Rivers career around plus he got more out of Ryan Matthews then anyone could have expected.

 

I like this hire.  Glad we went offense. Glad we went to a Cowher disciple. This could fail or succeed, but the decision makes sense after having

attempted to grown an assistant into a Head Coach. Wiz knows the drill (Roman, Bevell, Quinn would all have been learning on the job as Munch had done).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I like a 3-4.

We don't have anything close to the personnel for it.

But I have always liked the multiple looks it allows.

I wonder if Casey and Klug can work on the outside? I have no doubt Hill and Johnson can at least in the short term play the nose.

Morgan is probably too small as a 3-4 end, but maybe he can play it. I would guess Ayers would slide into the middle. Brown and Gooden

are on the edges, and McCarthy gets the other inside slot (think he played in a 3/4 at Miami.

Really, I guess I am most excited about a change to a 3-4. No good reason. Just like the formation.

Wow code. Ayers is a perfect 3-4 OLB. Brown can play the other spot. They just need to sign a couple good ILBs that shed blocks and tackle. As for the DL, Casey can play DE and slide inside on passing downs and still penetrate. Klug is a goner and I'm not sure how Morgan fits. Everyone can be replaced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not close-minded... I'm open to what he'll bring... but I'm really skeptical at the onset.

Having said that... it probably is a step up from Munch. I'll be rooting just as hard for him as I was for Fisher for years and for Munch the first year and a quarter. Go Whiz!

 

So will I. It feels good to be wrong. I was certain Webster would go with Quinn. 

 

Damn I'm glad we're moving in a better direction. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...