Jump to content

2026 NFL Draft Day 2 Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 694
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The Titans better shore up their interior OL whether it's in the draft, trades or free agency. 

When in 69, it is unlikely to get Pregnon.  

Vrabel trading away all those day 3 picks he won’t be there for

Posted Images

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, ctm said:

I was just in the process of looking at the trade value chart.  You're correct.

 

Hypothetically, moving from 69 to 52 (jumping the  steelers in the sim I ran) would require 135 points on the chart.  Our pick 142 is worth 35 points.  Not close.

 

This is where I'd start by finding out Levis's value.  Otherwise it's probably Zeitler.

 

 

 

I mentioned it immediately after the trade up for Faulk I didn't love moving pick #101 as part of the deal as not only is that a great trade back spot as we now see it removes a lot of flexibility on day 2.

 

Would of much preferred rather than maintaining the same number of picks just parting with pick #142 which was around the value of what Borgonzi gave up with all the pick swaps.

Edited by AussieTitanFan08
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

The Titans better shore up their interior OL whether it's in the draft, trades or free agency. 

going to be tough getting a guard at 69, we could probably get a center if we trade back into the 4th round. Might soon be time to call Kevin Zeitler up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, TeamRamrod said:

Just when I think I couldn’t have been more hurt by missing out on him. Do you remember where you saw that report?

 

Makes me happy they took Faulk. Faulk can beef up now and flip inside to treat Rutledge like he's Loki twice a year.

 

Angry Loki GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

 

Trading out of #35 to get Faulk would seem to be an indication that Borgonzi didn't see Pregnon in the same tier as Rutledge.

 

Pregnon and Bisontis played primarily on the left too. Borg may rank Dunker over those two for the same reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KogaShuko said:

There's still a couple nice TE options available after Stowers as well.  I wouldn't complain.

 

Espn has quite a huge drop in rankings for their OGs once Bisontis and Pregnon are gone.  It's going be interesting to see how or what they do for the interior  oline.

 

 

Makes me all the more glad we went up and got our guy at edge rather than chase a run on OL

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KogaShuko said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft/bestavailable/_/position/c

 

Just going by espns list and there definitely seems to be a better chance at landing a center over guard/tackle where they pick currently.

When in doubt draft the guy that plays C I say, even if they have to move to G, because they have the quicker feet and movement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NashvilleNinja said:

 

Figures.

 

Plenty of things to blast Lyons about but I get him being a bit hesitant on not only Faulk but the trade up to get him. This move now means they have two highly drafted young EDGE guys who are currently better against the run than they are disrupting the QB.

 

We will need the fulness of their rookie contracts to know but at least one of them really needs to significantly improve at affecting the QB otherwise we will look back and question whether it was the best use of draft capital by Borgonzi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...