IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 Hall is going to get around 10 to 12 million a year, nowhere near what McCaffery, Saquan, or even Henry are getting paid. So the whole top 5 RB money is a misnomer anyways. Omar, and Callidus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 Just now, socaltitan said: Lame. Why is it good resource allocation to spend top 5 RB money on a RB? You're the same people who will be bitching about Hall being overpaid in a year or two. You've had some terrible takes on this board. Classic internet nerd who thinks he know football more than everyone else. Lol sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 15 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Yes it does lol. The RB market is a hell of a lot better than the WR market, and Cam needs weapons. Simple as that. This team really can’t afford to spend another premium pick on a RB. And FA is basically an easy avenue to acquire an increase at that spot. And Pollard despite the good second half numbers looked fucking slow. Keeping Pollard who isn’t cheap is a horrible idea. NashvilleNinja, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 54 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Have you guys actually watched Hall play? He's electric. His YPC were low because they've had by far the worst offense in the league since he was drafted. What kind of offense has Tony Pollard been in the last two years? socaljake 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 Just now, TeamRamrod said: What kind of offense has Tony Pollard been in the last two years? It's true, but you can tell he's lost a step. I'm not banging the drum for Hall. I've just watched him play, and he's a damn good RB. socaljake 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 I'll put it like this, if I can get Hall for 11 and save 7 by cutting Pollard I'm doing it. Omar, ChemEngr79, and Kcroy420 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: I'll put it like this, if I can get Hall for 11 and save 7 by cutting Pollard I'm doing it. If we are taking first year cap number it’s probably greater than whatever Pollard is getting but less than 11. So I’d guess like 8 million . They are not really spending that much to upgrade when you consider that . Just checked Pollard’s cap number is 9.2 for this year. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 6 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: It's true, but you can tell he's lost a step. I'm not banging the drum for Hall. I've just watched him play, and he's a damn good RB. Who hasn’t watched him play? lol if you were starting a team from scratch with no context, I would understand choosing Hall over Pollard. They totally could decide to sign him and I would find a way to get on board with it. I’m talking about value. Signing names just to sign names is Ran Carthon stuff . socaljake 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 Just now, TeamRamrod said: Signing names just to sign names is Ran Carthon stuff . This board never learns FireInTheHole 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, TeamRamrod said: Who hasn’t watched him play? lol if you were starting a team from scratch with no context, I would understand choosing Hall over Pollard. They totally could decide to sign him and I would find a way to get on board with it. I’m talking about value. Signing names just to sign names is Ran Carthon stuff . I'm confused as you're all over the place. You mentioned his YPC. I said that's because he was on a terrible offense. You respond with so was Pollard. I said true, but noted he's lost a step. So, yes, if the choice is Hall for 4 to 5 million more I'm personally doing it. Good talk. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, rns90 said: If we are taking first year cap number it’s probably greater than whatever Pollard is getting but less than 11. So I’d guess like 8 million . They are not really spending that much to upgrade when you consider that . Just checked Pollard’s cap number is 9.2 for this year. These guys above are all over the place acting like signing a RB for 10 to 11 million a year when we are paying a slowed down Pollard that kind of money is Ran Carthon stuff lol. socaljake, and rns90 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, IsntLifeFunny said: I'm confused as you're all over the place. You mentioned his YPC. I said that's because he was on a terrible offense. You respond with so was Pollard. I said true, but noted he's lost a step. So, yes, if the choice is Hall for 4 to 5 million more I'm personally doing it. Good talk. I think it’s pretty comical that they think that Pollard at age 29 and at a high cap number will continue to be a top 10 RB ( which is what he is paid as) IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: I'm confused as you're all over the place. You mentioned his YPC. I said that's because he was on a terrible offense. You respond with so was Pollard. I said true, but noted he's lost a step. So, yes, if the choice is Hall for 4 to 5 million more I'm personally doing it. Good talk. If you can’t follow what I’m saying, idk what to tell ya bub socaljake 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, rns90 said: I think it’s pretty comical that they think that Pollard at age 29 and at a high cap number will continue to be a top 10 RB ( which is what he is paid as) That’s not what I said socaljake 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted February 19 Report Share Posted February 19 Just now, TeamRamrod said: If you can’t follow what I’m saying, idk what to tell ya bub I can't, because what you're saying makes zero sense. Hall is easily a better RB at this stage than Pollard. More explosion, less tread, and is more dynamic. You don't sign him just to sign him. You sign him to upgrade the offense. socaljake 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.