ctm Posted Monday at 09:06 AM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:06 AM Anyone pick the Panthers over the Rams? It"s the NFL. Shit happens every week. oldschool 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Monday at 09:07 AM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:07 AM 1 minute ago, ctm said: Anyone pick the Panthers over the Rams? It"s the NFL. Shit happens every week. The cardnials game should be all the evidence any1 needs for that. I trust in our ineptitude for the most part though. rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Monday at 03:20 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:20 PM Vikings and WSH play a low key tanker game next week. Depending on how they finish up, MIN is another team desperately needing a qb. DCTitan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supernope Posted Monday at 03:27 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:27 PM 7 minutes ago, rns90 said: Depending on how they finish up, MIN is another team desperately needing a qb. Not sold on Brosmear?! rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Monday at 03:31 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:31 PM 1 minute ago, Supernope said: Not sold on Brosmear?! I saw the “Levis” he pulled in the second quarter so no. he also missed on 2 or 3 straight passes in a drive in the first where guys were open. Also they just signed their GM and HC to extensions this past offseason . Supernope 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepingDeath Posted Monday at 03:37 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 03:37 PM 11 hours ago, titansfan said: Have you guys not been watching the games. We're losing and its not because we're tanking.. we're actually trying really hard to win Devil's Advocate: What does McCoy get out of winning any games? Dude was brought in for this very case as a "consultant." There may have been some off-the-record discussion about playing overly conservative with the goal of not trying too hard to win games. Play the rookies. Play an offense that sticks to basic concepts - those that can be used by whatever future coaching staff... but also won't threaten to win games. Injuries can be slow-walked. GM can get a good look at any practice squad players around the league with live game action. Firing of Callahan cleared the whole thing for the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted Monday at 05:00 PM Author Report Share Posted Monday at 05:00 PM 15 hours ago, rns90 said: I actually wonder how long Tomlin will stick around the Steelers . For the past 8 yrs or so his qb have been over the hill aging qbs or young qbs who can’t play. He’s wasting years coaching that squad. Can Will Howard break that streak? If so he might keep hanging around. https://www.si.com/nfl/steelers/onsi/news/pittsburgh-steelers-need-will-howard-move rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted Monday at 06:42 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 06:42 PM rns90, Callidus, and OILERMAN 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Monday at 06:53 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 06:53 PM 8 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Optimal draft order . Titans at 1 and team 2 is almost a lock take a qb . After that qb desperate teams w/currency to burn is behind the line and need to trade up. you don’t want the Jets or Browns to win too much and move too further down. DCTitan, Alcibiades, and Callidus 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondra316v2 Posted Monday at 06:57 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 06:57 PM 2 minutes ago, rns90 said: Optimal draft order . Titans at 1 and team 2 is almost a lock take a qb . After that qb desperate teams w/currency to burn is behind the line and need to trade up. you don’t want the Jets or Browns to win too much and move too further down. Titans theoretically could trade down to 1-2, again to 1-3 and pick up a way over draft chart value haul. I've been low key preaching this for weeks and somehow it's still a possibility. CreepingDeath, DCTitan, and Alcibiades 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Monday at 07:00 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:00 PM 1 minute ago, bondra316v2 said: Titans theoretically could trade down to 1-2, again to 1-3 and pick up a way over draft chart value haul. I've been low key preaching this for weeks and somehow it's still a possibility. In terms of franchise/owner stupidity though the Browns, Jets and Raiders are at the top of the mountain and could be had. The Saints owner Benson is nowhere in that league of fools. They might just stay put at 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Monday at 07:02 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:02 PM 7 minutes ago, rns90 said: Optimal draft order . Titans at 1 and team 2 is almost a lock take a qb . After that qb desperate teams w/currency to burn is behind the line and need to trade up. you don’t want the Jets or Browns to win too much and move too further down. Yup, a dream scenario would be something like. 1. Titans 2. Saints 3. Raiders 4. Jets With a clear number 1 qb and hopefully 1 or 2 more qbs teams like enough that we have our choice of none qbs at 3 or 4. rns90 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted Monday at 07:14 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:14 PM 9 minutes ago, Callidus said: Yup, a dream scenario would be something like. 1. Titans 2. Saints 3. Raiders 4. Jets With a clear number 1 qb and hopefully 1 or 2 more qbs teams like enough that we have our choice of none qbs at 3 or 4. This would be my optimal one. The Saints aren’t moving off two. then you have the clown show Raiders and Jets jockeying for position to draft a qb, and the ability to make them overpay for the #1 pick. We could probably get a young starting level player from one of these teams as well. Callidus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted Monday at 07:59 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:59 PM I wouldn't limit how far you trade back its all about getting the best trade package possible and if that comes from the Rams/Steelers/Cardinals so be it. Should they end up with the #1 pick the one non negotiable for me is getting a 2027 1st round pick in any trade back package (I would prefer a future 1st over a second 1st round pick in this draft). BeedoeLaw, titanskick8851, and Nash 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted Monday at 08:30 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:30 PM 30 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: I wouldn't limit how far you trade back its all about getting the best trade package possible and if that comes from the Rams/Steelers/Cardinals so be it. Should they end up with the #1 pick the one non negotiable for me is getting a 2027 1st round pick in any trade back package (I would prefer a future 1st over a second 1st round pick in this draft). If the trade back is past pick 7 or so there should be 2 extra firsts minimum. BeedoeLaw, and DCTitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.