rns90 Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 Just kind of spitballing stuff, but assuming they draft Ward at 1, and trade down from 35 to pick up an extra pick , I wonder where WR kind of lands in the needs area list and when they choose to adresss it in the draft. I’m also assuming they have signed a starting RT and a starting level S. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLinks Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 PFF has him ranked 233rd. He’s 6’6” 342 lbs. He’s a backup to Sweat in all likelihood. Titans often bring in late round prospects on these 30 visits as well. Jackson played 12 games and 382 snaps in 2024. What does that tell you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 9 Nines Posted March 7, 2025 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 Big news: A few weeks ago I met the lady who does Callahan's weekly pedicure. I asked her to ask him about Cam Ward. This morning she did when she gave Callahan's his pedicure. She asked, "have you heard about Cam Ward?" She told me he said yes. BeedoeLaw, Hyperion, Callidus, and 2 others 3 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 17 minutes ago, rns90 said: Just kind of spitballing stuff, but assuming they draft Ward at 1, and trade down from 35 to pick up an extra pick , I wonder where WR kind of lands in the needs area list and when they choose to adresss it in the draft. I’m also assuming they have signed a starting RT and a starting level S. I'd love Restrepo in the third or fourth in that instance. I think they'll sign a couple middling starting caliber receivers in FA like a Josh Palmer or Marquez Valdes Scantling, depending on what happens with NWI. It would be sweet if Higgins ends up playing on the tag and the Titans get him next year with all that extra money, while releasing Ridley and replacing him with a high round pick in 2026. AvgJoe, and rns90 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 10 minutes ago, tgo said: I'd love Restrepo in the third or fourth in that instance. I think they'll sign a couple middling starting caliber receivers in FA like a Josh Palmer or Marquez Valdes Scantling, depending on what happens with NWI. It would be sweet if Higgins ends up playing on the tag and the Titans get him next year with all that extra money, while releasing Ridley and replacing him with a high round pick in 2026. I honestly think they’ll sign him to an extension in CIN. They seem dumb enough to do it. Palmer is a good under the radar signing at WR. tgo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 Idk why but I can just see one of the Iowa State receivers on the titans. GLinks, and Dangermode 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 1 hour ago, tgo said: I'd love Restrepo in the third or fourth in that instance. I think they'll sign a couple middling starting caliber receivers in FA like a Josh Palmer or Marquez Valdes Scantling, depending on what happens with NWI. It would be sweet if Higgins ends up playing on the tag and the Titans get him next year with all that extra money, while releasing Ridley and replacing him with a high round pick in 2026. I fail to see the fascination with Higgins. Nice 2 but he's no more of a 1 than Ridley is. GLinks 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 1 minute ago, BudsOilers said: I fail to see the fascination with Higgins. Nice 2 but he's no more of a 1 than Ridley is. Right, I just like the idea of the number 2 WR being a possession WR in Callahan's offense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dangermode Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 2 hours ago, tgo said: Cam Jackson more of a 3rd-4th round guy with all the DL ahead of him I think, but yes. More like 5th round Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeamRamrod Posted March 7, 2025 Report Share Posted March 7, 2025 I’m not sure if it was in that Nick Suss article with Brinker but Zach Lyons said today they’re planning on using like 24 of their 30 visits on Day 2 and 3 guys. titanskick8851, tgo, and GLinks 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 8, 2025 Report Share Posted March 8, 2025 1 hour ago, TeamRamrod said: I’m not sure if it was in that Nick Suss article with Brinker but Zach Lyons said today they’re planning on using like 24 of their 30 visits on Day 2 and 3 guys. How many 1st round guys do you need to meet if you are expecting to pick top 3 at worst? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted March 8, 2025 Report Share Posted March 8, 2025 23 minutes ago, Callidus said: How many 1st round guys do you need to meet if you are expecting to pick top 3 at worst? You could trade back. They could fall to 35... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 8, 2025 Report Share Posted March 8, 2025 2 minutes ago, BudsOilers said: You could trade back. They could fall to 35... Planning for a double trade back when you havent traded back once pr for a top 5 guy to fall to 35 is a misallocation of resources Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BudsOilers Posted March 8, 2025 Report Share Posted March 8, 2025 1 minute ago, Callidus said: Planning for a double trade back when you havent traded back once pr for a top 5 guy to fall to 35 is a misallocation of resources If they bring in 6 or so 1st round grade guys, personally don't see the big deal. Obviously the 4 (Carter, Ward, Sanders, Hunter) are set but maybe they bring in another couple if they could trade beyond 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 8, 2025 Report Share Posted March 8, 2025 13 minutes ago, BudsOilers said: If they bring in 6 or so 1st round grade guys, personally don't see the big deal. Obviously the 4 (Carter, Ward, Sanders, Hunter) are set but maybe they bring in another couple if they could trade beyond 3. Ya, i have no problem with that. I said more than 6 would seem excessive for where we are. If your picking 12th then you need to meet more guys because the likelihood of guys you want being picked ia higher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.