Jump to content

Trump (and others) indicted in GA


Starkiller

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 675
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dershowitz is trying to spin it as a bullshit First Amendment issue.   I'd be very interested to hear Dershowitz' argument that explains how organizing and implementing a plan that includes

LongTimeFan when you ask him to explain something political:  

Posted Images

1 hour ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

That's not exactly how it works. The only thing needed to be proven is conspiracy in a RICO case. In that instance he's guilty of everything anyone else involved did at the time of the conspiracy. 

His lawyers will have an easier time defending him as the only defendant vs being on trial at the same time as multiple other people.

 

It’s not a question of whether a crime was committed, it’s a matter of whether he was involved. That’s how he benefits from being tried alone. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Starkiller said:

His lawyers will have an easier time defending him as the only defendant vs being on trial at the same time as multiple other people.

 

It’s not a question of whether a crime was committed, it’s a matter of whether he was involved. That’s how he benefits from being tried alone. 

I'm not entirely sure if this is correct. @TitansPDO @ChesterCopperpot1

 

What do you guys think? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, begooode said:

The symbolism of take-no-prisoners, never yield Ms Kraken -- the crazy lady who was still saying in her depositions that Trump didn't go far enough, martial law, blah, blah, SO MUCH EVIDENCE, blah, blah.  For her to plead guilty, turn on the others, and fucking apologize to the electors is huge and has to be playing epically in the election-denying, rabid Trumper's mind.

 

Yes, you idiots, you were the mark! "Election Integrity" You wanted so hard to believe this utterly unamerican bullshit that you were all in on the coup.

I wouldn't go that far. They simply won't care. As to the co-defendants they know they're fucked if they were involved. This lady was the overseer for a lot of the conspiracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, reo said:

 

Again it's not that simple. It's still the same case for chesebro. It's just happening earlier for him than the others. If he's part of the conspiracy, he's responsible for all acts by the criminal conspiracy. That's the power of RICO. 

 

For a RICO charge you have to prove the conspiracy existed and 2 overt acts towards that end. It does not matter if he didn't do anything illegal.

I'm also not sure about this. I don't think it's exactly correct. They have to prove intent to knowingly enter a conspiracy to commit a crime. The crimes can be committed by others and he's in the net for it, but they do have to prove he knowingly entered into the conspiracy to commit the underlying crime. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

I wouldn't go that far. They simply won't care. As to the co-defendants they know they're fucked if they were involved. This lady was the overseer for a lot of the conspiracy.


Then the pile of things Trumpers won’t care about continues to grow. The pile of contradictions (they cared very much about these exact things not too long ago) continues to grow.  They can continue to move the goalposts, the narratives, the latest outrages, but they are stacking losses, regardless of their collective negation of those losses.

 

And while they can go ostrich mode now after all their grandstanding failed, I am thoroughly enjoying the scoreboard in 2023 after a dodgy 2 year run where Team Truth was taking a beating from a bunch of aggrieved nihilists cosplaying ‘patriots’. F ‘em.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, begooode said:


Then the pile of things Trumpers won’t care about continues to grow. The pile of contradictions (they cared very much about these exact things not too long ago) continues to grow.  They can continue to move the goalposts, the narratives, the latest outrages, but they are stacking losses, regardless of their collective negation of those losses.

 

And while they can go ostrich mode now after all their grandstanding failed, I am thoroughly enjoying the scoreboard in 2023 after a dodgy 2 year run where Team Truth was taking a beating from a bunch of aggrieved nihilists cosplaying ‘patriots’. F ‘em.

It's going to be really interesting to see Trump's response to this. He may actually use the gag order in his favor and say how unfair it is and that he hardly knew her and then stop answering questions. That's his best route I guess, but if he doesn't and answers I wonder what he would say when this lady was on the inside and sitting at the fire place as this entire thing was hashed out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

It's going to be really interesting to see Trump's response to this. He may actually use the gag order in his favor and say how unfair it is and that he hardly knew her and then stop answering questions. That's his best route I guess, but if he doesn't and answers I wonder what he would say when this lady was on the inside and sitting at the fire place as this entire thing was hashed out. 


Removing Trump for a second, the fact that a president of the United States tried to make Sidney Powell special counsel of anything after she disclosed all her crazy, unbelievable bullshit — that he knew was crazy unbelievable bullshit — to overturn his election loss is one of the most disturbing things to have ever occurred in the White House. 

Edited by begooode
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nine said:

SCOTUS established long ago that executive privilege and immunity do not extend to criminal activity.

 

There’s no question that Jack Smith will be calling Powell as a witness.  If he can use her testimony to demonstrate the plot they orchestrated was criminally fraudulent in nature,  then any claims of executive privilege and immunity instantly evaporate for that entire bunch.  
 

People of wealth, power, and influence  can get away with a lot….but nobody  fucks with American democracy.  

This is the type of shit that makes me proud to be an American. The Trump presidency, as horrible as it was, really restored my faith in the resilience of American democracy. A lesser country would have fallen to that tyrant. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

This is the type of shit that makes me proud to be an American. The Trump presidency, as horrible as it was, really restored my faith in the resilience of American democracy. A lesser country would have fallen to that tyrant. 

Little Earl, headhunter and El Gullibo can't wait to vote for him again.

Edited by MadMax
Misspelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

I'm also not sure about this. I don't think it's exactly correct. They have to prove intent to knowingly enter a conspiracy to commit a crime. The crimes can be committed by others and he's in the net for it, but they do have to prove he knowingly entered into the conspiracy to commit the underlying crime. 

 

They have to prove he was part of the conspiracy but he does not have to do anything illegal. That's the whole point of RICO. Mob bosses would get their underlings to do all the illegal shit and never actually do anything illegal themselves. 

 

So you have to prove that there was a criminal conspiracy and then they have to prove that at least 2 overt acts were done in order to carry out that conspiracy then all involved in the conspiracy are guilty. You don't even have to actually commit the crime.

 

It's like if you're planning on robbing a bank, you don't actually have to rob the bank. You just have to make the plan and 2 acts have to be done in order for that crime to be committed. And then say you're the get away driver waiting in the car and one of your co-conspirators shoots someone in the bank then gets caught inside the bank, you as the driver who ever actually drove anywhere, is still responsible for your co-conspirator shooting the guy in the bank and for the criminal conspiracy.. as is the person who helped plan it even if they weren't anywhere near the actually heist. 

 

So in this case, Powell was part of the voting machine scheme and is able to give evidence about it. Chesebro was part of the whole conspiracy so that will include him.

 

But in this case Chesebro was in charge of the fake electors iirc so he wasn't just giving legal advice either.

 

 

EDIT: rereading your post. I think we might be talking around each other to a degree. I'm not sure if we actually disagree.

Edited by reo
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

This is the type of shit that makes me proud to be an American. The Trump presidency, as horrible as it was, really restored my faith in the resilience of American democracy. A lesser country would have fallen to that tyrant. 

 

It's definitely taken steps towards restoring my faith... 2020 was awesome but 2024 imo will be another big step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...