Jump to content

JRob Fired. Wyatt Confirmed.


Titans279

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Vrabel gaining more personnel control is not a good thing - regardless of who the new GM is - I promise you that. 

Vrabel's comment "who is he going to throw it to?" about the receivers/Malik is a little more cryptic now.    I loved Jrob, but I love AAS more. She ain't fucking around. Ya love to see it. 

Posted Images

6 hours ago, AvgJoe said:

I’m not fully on the fire Vrabel bandwagon…..yet. But if he doesn’t adapt the offense and bring in a sharp mind to run that side he needs to be canned prior to 2024.

We hired Jeff Fisher and I can't see him going back to hiring someone else like LaFluer.  He proudly touts his boomer offensive philosophies, and he won't keep his hands off of it.  You just have to hope he'll at least find someone more competent like Smith and that they catch fire in the playoffs.  

Edited by TerryBoats
Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

LOL, you're delusional 

 

Give an example of a trade involving Henry that nets a franchise QB. 


Henry + 2 1sts to the Lions/Bears/Cardinals if Stroud or Levis is there.
 

Or trading Henry to Pittsburgh to move up a few spots to 12 for Anthony Richardson? 
 

Doesnt seem implausible from a value standpoint - moreso from the fact that Vrabel would probably rage quite if he lost Henry. 

Edited by tgo
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tgo said:


Henry + 2 1sts to the Lions/Bears/Cardinals if Stroud or Levis is there.
 

Or trading Henry to Pittsburgh to move up a few spots to 12 for Anthony Richardson? 
 

Doesnt seem implausible from a value standpoint - moreso from the fact that Vrabel would probably rage quite if he lost Henry. 

 

Henry has little to no trade value deal with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tgo said:


Henry + 2 1sts to the Lions/Bears/Cardinals if Stroud or Levis is there.
 

Or trading Henry to Pittsburgh to move up a few spots to 12 for Anthony Richardson? 
 

Doesnt seem implausible from a value standpoint - moreso from the fact that Vrabel would probably rage quite if he lost Henry. 

The thought of drafting Levis or Richardson is scary to me. Imo, would set the franchise back even more. That of course is assuming we ever landed in that position.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Henry has little to no trade value deal with it.


That’s absolutely ridiculous - he has more trade value than Tannehill. Especially for a team wanting a stabilizer. 
 

Either way - It makes no sense whatsoever to cut him though - only saves 6M in cap space. 
 

If Strunk doesn’t see this team as a contender this year - what could realistically be done at this point to turn it into a contender next offseason with an aging RB and an aging mediocre QB? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, titans79 said:

The thought of drafting Levis or Richardson is scary to me. Imo, would set the franchise back even more. That of course is assuming we ever landed in that position.  


Get used to the idea of Vrabel wanting a mobile QB with questionable accuracy. It’s not a bug for him - it’s a feature. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tgo said:


Get used to the idea of Vrabel wanting a mobile QB with questionable accuracy. It’s not a bug for him - it’s a feature. 

I was gonna say, neither of those two are necessarily poster QBs for the ones clamoring for a more modern offensive system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly AAS isn't happy with the direction of the team and wants a championship.

 

A bold off season strategy would be consistent with that.  What that would possibly entail, I have no idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TerryBoats said:

He absolutely hated Mariota.  What makes you think this?

He hated Mariota because he refused to play in a win and your in game.  He wants a mobile accurate QB who does not make mistakes.  My guess Tannehill stays two more seasons they draft their QB in 2024 and he starts in 2025

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Jonboy unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...