Jump to content

Biden White House: Year 4


tgo

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, El Guapo said:

You guys are a riot. So lets see, we disagree so fuck the other side?

 

Great bi partisanship. So in that light, fuck all of you dumb fucks. No sympathy when we take back congress and later the Presidency.  

Obama tried bipartisanship. He got rejected by a very partisan GOP. So fuck that...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No I don't think that has anything to do with super rich. It is the top 1.8% of income earners though.    Also if you think the proposals to raise the taxes on people making that much are ex

A couple of years ago, I was  late for a conference call with colleagues in Germany and India. After joining the call and apologizing for being late. Someone from India said, "just be like Trump and s

Voter ID isn't the big issue. The big issue is state law proposals that allow state legislatures to overrule the vote in elections and that take power away from the state's secretaries of state as wel

Posted Images

32 minutes ago, El Guapo said:

You guys are a riot. So lets see, we disagree so fuck the other side?

 

Great bi partisanship. So in that light, fuck all of you dumb fucks. No sympathy when we take back congress and later the Presidency.  

 

No, dipshit. GOP has been running on a platform of obstruction and anti-dem for the past decade+. 

 

hell, Obamacare is a Republican free market healthcare strategy and the GOP wouldn't vote for anything Obama brought forth. They just wanted to delay and obstruct.

 

Then a SC vacancy happens and Obama nominates a centrist and McConnell wouldn't even bring him up for a vote.

 

And now the only reason they want to talk about bipartisanship is so they can obstruct more.

 

Fuck the GOP. They want bipartisanship? Come to the table. Stop voting against anything and everything the Dems want to pass just b/c the Dems want to pass it. The only reason Biden is running as a left leaning Dem is b/c he has to negotiate w/ the left to get things to pass. If there was a chance in hell of actually getting Republican votes for things, he'd negotiate w/ them and they'd pull him more center. But they won't vote for anything so why try?

 

McConnell stole some seats on the SC. Expanding the bench is a reaction to his extreme tactics.

 

Republicans don't have any ideas. They don't have a healthcare plan. They're just anti-Dem. That's it.

Edited by reo
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/11/2021 at 2:37 AM, El Guapo said:

So congress can overturn SC decisions? And congress can reverse itself any time it changes party dominance? That seems like a nightmare.

 

No, I do not agree with this. As a conservative, I prefer a ruling by a liberal SC than a liberal congress.  The SC is more intelligent, freer from outside press, not influenced by money donors, etc. 

 

That was the way it was before the way it is that we know.  But I agree, the SC is far more intelligent that Congress.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Titans279 said:

 

 

 

 

He said it would take 6 months or more to get everything in place to start making major changes on immigration policy, so that should be the expectation. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, tgo said:

 

He said it would take 6 months or more to get everything in place to start making major changes on immigration policy, so that should be the expectation. 

 

Wouldn't it be normal to sign them and then for the changes to happen slowly? He just hasn't actually signed them after announcing them.

 

And I would expect numbers to at least be slightly higher than they had been under Trump because Biden should be more friendly. Instead he's been letting in fewer people. These are heavily vetted refugees, not random asylum seekers too btw.

Edited by Titans279
Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Titans279 said:

 

Wouldn't it be normal to sign them and then for the changes to happen slowly? He just hasn't actually signed them after announcing them.

 

And I would expect numbers to at least be slightly higher than they had been under Trump because Biden should be more friendly. Instead he's been letting in fewer people. These are heavily vetted refugees, not random asylum seekers too btw.

 

There is a global pandemic raging across the globe in case you hadn't noticed.... Try thinking for yourself rather than letting twitter drive your daily outrage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

There is a global pandemic raging across the globe in case you hadn't noticed.... Try thinking for yourself rather than letting twitter drive your daily outrage.

 

Weak sauce. Biden's been letting in fewer than Trump was. Pandemic doesn't explain that.

Edited by Titans279
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Titans279 said:

 

Weak sauce

 

Many countries around the world still have closed borders. Sorry, processing refugees is not high on the list right now. This is basic stuff that should be easy to understand unless you are simply looking for a reason to get pissed off. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Many countries around the world still have closed borders. Sorry, processing refugees is not high on the list right now. This is basic stuff that should be easy to understand unless you are simply looking for a reason to get pissed off. 

 

Biden's been letting in fewer than Trump was. Pandemic doesn't explain that. Again, weak sauce.

 

Your inability to handle minor criticisms of Biden is amazing though.

Edited by Titans279
Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Titans279 said:

 

Biden's been letting in fewer than Trump was. Pandemic doesn't explain that. Again, weak sauce.

 

Your inability to handle minor criticisms of Biden is amazing though.

 

lol. Biden is taking the pandemic more seriously, easily explains your weak sauce point. And did I not just call out the CDC/FDA for suspending the J&J vaccine. The White House should have overruled them but was scared to do. sometimes doing the right thing is hard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

lol. Biden is taking the pandemic more seriously, easily explains your weak sauce point. And did I not just call out the CDC/FDA for suspending the J&J vaccine. The White House should have overruled them but was scared to do. sometimes doing the right thing is hard.


It doesn’t really explain it. It’s an excuse that sounds plausible but doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • tgo changed the title to Biden White House: Year 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...