Callidus Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 Since I have started to lean back twords wr as being the possible pick I thought we could do the wr version of the other thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBukafax Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 (edited) Carnal taints for Carnel Tate. Edited February 20 by TheBukafax Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 Don't tell me what to do. Supernope 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 15 minutes ago, Jamalisms said: Don't tell me what to do. Easy, Wolverine... twas but a suggestion. Retract them claws. And for the record, TATE. Callidus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted February 21 Author Report Share Posted February 21 For me its tate and only tate at 4. If they can get a small trade back and land tate or lemon while picking up and 2nd or 3rd+ that would be golden. Im very iffy on tyson because of the injuries and some troubling analytics. Catch rate Tyson62.9% Tate 82.8 Lemon 73.1 Yards per route run Tyson 2.37 Tate 3.35 Lemon 3.13 Average Yards after the catch Tyson 4.3 Tate 4.3 Lemon 6.4 Contestes catch rate Tyson 43.8% Tate 85.7 Lemon 66.7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 I like Lemon the most, but I struggle with seeing us picking him. He's likely 5'10 or 5'11 who will be mostly relegated to playing in the slot. And he looks like a 4.4-4.5 guy to me. That combination usually doesn't scream top 5-10 pick. There have been some smaller WR who have gone in the top 10, but they're guys who are burners like Waddle. Lemon is more quick than fast. Callidus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Alcibiades Posted February 21 Popular Post Report Share Posted February 21 Tate....and the others are outside the top 10 for me. Callidus, cshumak2, SuperFreak90, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 I'm for the one and only Top G on this list. Tate#4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 Titandan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted February 21 Author Report Share Posted February 21 Just now, SleepingTitan said: What are you doing out of the closet. SleepingTitan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliTitan3518 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 (edited) I don't want any of them. I think we will sign a WR in FA and keep Ridley. If we pick a WR it won't be until day 3 is my guess. Edited February 21 by CaliTitan3518 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 2 hours ago, CaliTitan3518 said: I don't want any of them. I think we will sign a WR in FA and keep Ridley. If we pick a WR it won't be until day 3 is my guess. It's like clock work. Gotta look for the most decorated wide receiver just entering into the twilight of his career. Tyreek anyone? It's called the Yancy Thigpen curse. Who's going to finally break it? IowaOiler, and Callidus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 3 hours ago, CaliTitan3518 said: I don't want any of them. Why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliTitan3518 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 3 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: Why? Because none of them are worthy of the #4 pick. I think the gap between these guys and the end of the 1st or 2nd round guys isnt very big. These guys would be great if we were picking around #15. Tate is the only one in consideration for the #4 pick. I think he is a long skinny WR who lacks explosiveness. I think he is a contributor but not a game changer at WR. He is better suited as a #2 which is what he has been his whole career at Ohio st. I don't see him as being the guy in the NFL. Next years draft class is looking a lot stronger. We will see what we do with Ridley and the FAs. I would be very surpirsed if we dont sign 1 or 2 of the top guys available in FA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle021 Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 If they were all healthy? Tyson, Tate, Lemon I would be fine with either Tate or Lemon at 4, and would love Tyson over both of them if i knew he would be healthy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.