rns90 Posted yesterday at 03:52 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 03:52 AM 16 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Also today Daniel Jeremiah said watch the Saints and Eagles as teams to move up in the first round. #8, 42 and whatever else for the fourth pick sounds good to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted yesterday at 03:52 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 03:52 AM 1 hour ago, MemphisTitan said: See if Jerry Jones likes Love and ask him about #12 and 20. 4 and 35 for 12 and 20 and a 4th round pick He may also see Reese as his Parsons replacement. I'd take two potential quality starters at high-value positions (edge, OL, or WR) over what we're likely to be getting at #4. animatormike, and DCTitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted yesterday at 04:00 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:00 AM 2 minutes ago, rns90 said: #8, 42 and whatever else for the fourth pick sounds good to me. Throwing the scenario out there that gets a bidding war between the Saints and Chiefs keeping in mind both surprisingly had visits with Arvell Reese. If the first 3 picks fall like this Raiders - Mendoza Jets - Bailey Cardinals - Love Do you take Reese at #4 or Trade back with the Saints and get picks #8 and #42 hoping either Styles or Tate makes it through to #8. Similar question with the Chiefs except you would be getting picks #9 and #40 with a lesser chance either Styles or Tate makes it to #9. titanskick8851, and DCTitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted yesterday at 04:18 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:18 AM (edited) 21 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Throwing the scenario out there that gets a bidding war between the Saints and Chiefs keeping in mind both surprisingly had visits with Arvell Reese. If the first 3 picks fall like this Raiders - Mendoza Jets - Bailey Cardinals - Love Do you take Reese at #4 or Trade back with the Saints and get picks #8 and #42 hoping either Styles or Tate makes it through to #8. Similar question with the Chiefs except you would be getting picks #9 and #40 with a lesser chance either Styles or Tate makes it to #9. I personally would take Reese but let me try to map this out . 5) Tyson—NYG 6)Dallas—Styles (trade up) 7)WSH—Tate 8=kind of stuck in no man’s land unless you want Bain or best available OL, Delane, or Lemon, Downs maybe . BTW this is an interesting little rumor/tidbit but Love is allegedly the top player on NO board. Edited yesterday at 04:22 AM by rns90 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted yesterday at 04:27 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:27 AM 6 minutes ago, rns90 said: BTW this is an interesting little rumor/tidbit but Love is allegedly the top player on NO board. Trading up to 3/4 to draft Love after signing Travis Etienne to a 4 year, $52M deal would be downright Jetsian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted yesterday at 04:29 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:29 AM Just now, NashvilleNinja said: Trading up to 3/4 to draft Love after signing Travis Etienne to a 4 year, $52M deal would be downright Jetsian. I think A Chan’s contract has an out after two years but it’s still a dumb move . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted yesterday at 04:31 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:31 AM 3 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: Trading up to 3/4 to draft Love after signing Travis Etienne to a 4 year, $52M deal would be downright Jetsian. The Saints wouldn't be trading up for Love they would trading up for Reese. TheChosenTitan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted yesterday at 04:31 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:31 AM Just now, rns90 said: I think A Chan’s contract has an out after two years but it’s still a dumb move . Huh? I feel like I just accidentally turned a few pages ahead in the novel... lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted yesterday at 04:33 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:33 AM Just now, NashvilleNinja said: Huh? I feel like I just accidentally turned a few pages ahead in the novel... lol lol that’s how last name is pronounced now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted yesterday at 04:33 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:33 AM 13 minutes ago, rns90 said: I personally would take Reese but let me try to map this out . 5) Tyson—NYG 6)Dallas—Styles (trade up) 7)WSH—Tate 8=kind of stuck in no man’s land unless you want Bain or best available OL, Delane, or Lemon, Downs maybe . BTW this is an interesting little rumor/tidbit but Love is allegedly the top player on NO board. For the Giants to be reportedly seriously considering taking Tyson or Tate at pick #5 they must be a concerned about how quickly Nabers will be able to return to his pre knee injury self. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted yesterday at 04:37 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:37 AM 1 minute ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: For the Giants to be reportedly seriously considering taking Tyson or Tate at pick #5 they must be a concerned about how quickly Nabers will be able to return to his pre knee injury self. I read they are also looking at Mauignoa with that pick . The thing that sucks is that there are RT basically in the top 10 but we don’t really have a need there That’s why I would stay put and take Reese /Styles. Because the remaining elite players either don’t fit a major need or have flags of some sort (Bain, Tyson) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted yesterday at 04:39 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:39 AM 4 minutes ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: For the Giants to be reportedly seriously considering taking Tyson or Tate at pick #5 they must be a concerned about how quickly Nabers will be able to return to his pre knee injury self. I'm going to laugh if the Giants draft Tyson and he gets injured in their 1st home game. Not cheering for it, but considering the injury prone concerns with Tyson + that Giants turf wouldn't shock me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleepingTitan Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM Start at 5:00 TerryBoats, and titanskick8851 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:42 AM 2 minutes ago, socaljake said: I'm going to laugh if the Giants draft Tyson and he gets injured in their 1st home game. Not cheering for it, but considering the injury prone concerns with Tyson + that Giants turf wouldn't shock me. Might be smoke to get some other team to jump in front of NO or KC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted yesterday at 04:48 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 04:48 AM 6 minutes ago, socaljake said: I'm going to laugh if the Giants draft Tyson and he gets injured in their 1st home game. Not cheering for it, but considering the injury prone concerns with Tyson + that Giants turf wouldn't shock me. I'm a little surprised how it seems there are enough teams willing to put his injury history to the side and take him in the top 16 picks maybe even as high as 5th. The talent has never been the issue but talent means nothing if you can't stay on the field. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.