Bongo59 Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 Ramon on 104.5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 23 minutes ago, headhunter said: This guy is retarded Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 7 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Assuming my boy Omar Cooper Jr is now fully entrenched as a late first round pick I hope Borgonzi finds a way to position himself to get either Ted Hurst or Bryce Lance both big fast WR. Lol Is there an echo in here? I've been saying the same thing the last day or two, here and there. I'd rather have Lance though. If he had the same profile but played at a major college he'd easily be a top 5 pick. I'd be tempted to take Lance anyway even if Cooper did drop to 2 and we drafted him. Cooper would replace Ridley, but we'd still need the big body guy. titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 (edited) 3 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: Lol Is there an echo in here? I've been saying the same thing the last day or two, here and there. I'd rather have Lance though. If he had the same profile but played at a major college he'd easily be a top 5 pick. I'd be tempted to take Lance anyway even if Cooper did drop to 2 and we drafted him. Cooper would replace Ridley, but we'd still need the big body guy. Idk if i would call hurst or lance big bodied. Edited March 11 by Callidus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 1 minute ago, Callidus said: Idk if i would call hurst or lance big bodied. Tall bodied. Deep vertical-bodied. Take the top off the defense bodied. rns90, and Callidus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 18 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: Tall bodied. Deep vertical-bodied. Take the top off the defense bodied. They are tall, and i like lance. I jist thonk 210+ when i hear big bodied for a wr. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lantern Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 (edited) I still would prefer Bain, Styles, Reese, Bailey, at four to Tate or Love. If we draft Love....I can get behind it. Tate at four......is a reach. If we trade back I can get behind Tate, Edited March 11 by Lantern Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 I'm cooling on Bain. I think he's gonna drop Supernope 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Lantern said: I still would prefer Bain, Styles, Reese, Bailey, at four to Tate or Love. If we draft Love....I can get behind it. Tate at four......is a reach. If we trade back I can get behind Tate, I think it's Love at 4. Defense with the 2nd pick. Either off ball LB or DE. They could try to trade down again from round 2 like last year. IOL and WR in the middle rounds. If the Titans don't sign Jennings in FA, I'm going to start to believe Ridley is staying. There's really no one else out there. Hollywood Brown is not an upgrade over Ridley. Perhaps Daboll pounded the table to keep him as he did coach Ridley at Bama. Edited March 11 by socaltitan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 42 minutes ago, socaltitan said: I think it's Love at 4. So I'm guessing if we pick Love at 4 you're out on Borgonzi. Can't be wasting premium capital on RBs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaljake Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 1 hour ago, IsntLifeFunny said: So I'm guessing if we pick Love at 4 you're out on Borgonzi. Can't be wasting premium capital on RBs. Nope, you're wrong again Levis lover! I said I wouldn't waste top 5 RB money on Breece Hall and I stand by that. I'm ok taking Love at 4 because I think he's a potential generational level talent in a very weak draft at the top. Nice try. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 3 hours ago, socaltitan said: Nope, you're wrong again Levis lover! I said I wouldn't waste top 5 RB money on Breece Hall and I stand by that. I'm ok taking Love at 4 because I think he's a potential generational level talent in a very weak draft at the top. Nice try. Don't sink top 5 money into a RB. What I actually meant was sink a top 5 pick! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 My favorite part of the exchange is being called a Levis lover from someone whose handle literally used to be Jake Locker. Classic lack of self awareness on both accounts. Thanks for sharing. headhunter, and rns90 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 (edited) 5 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: Don't sink top 5 money into a RB. What I actually meant was sink a top 5 pick! Im pretty sure if you spend a top 5 pick on a rb you are getting pretty close to doing both. Edited March 11 by Callidus IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted March 11 Report Share Posted March 11 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Callidus said: Im pretty sure if you spend a top 5 pick on a rb you are getting pretty close to doing both. The lack of self awareness at all points to not even joke around. He didn't even say the Levis part with a tinge of irony lol. Edited March 11 by IsntLifeFunny rns90, and Callidus 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.