heyitsmeallen Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 11 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: What it means is it's likely true Not necessarily… you’ve been wrong plenty. Although I hope it’s true. Jamalisms 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post CreepingDeath Posted April 29 Popular Post Report Share Posted April 29 5 hours ago, IowaOiler said: Tannehill converted a metric shit-ton of 3rd and long/medium because of meathead wanting to run the ball on every conflicted down. There are an endless amount of threads on this forum that have detailed this, with statistics to support. Define "metric shit-ton" and "endless" so we know where we are starting from. Why did Tannehill's super-powers disappear in the playoffs when he was asked to throw more than 15 passes? (Don't bother checking, I'm right on this. When Tannehill threw more than 15 passes in the playoffs, his teams lost. Same winning % of Andy Dalton... only Dalton's teams made the playoffs more times than Tannehill's.) bizzyeddie, oldschool, rns90, and 2 others 3 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 3 hours ago, Somedude said: With T rex arms Twice Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepingDeath Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 4 hours ago, scine09 said: In the Baltimore loss specifically he was put in awful spots by the coaching staff. Also honestly the coaches did him no favors in the NE playoff game. When you limit the chances a QB gets to throw it takes away their effectiveness. All QBs need to be allowed to get into a rhythm. After the first drive against the Ravens when they marched right down the field they decided to give it to Henry over and over again, limiting what Tannehill could do and ruining any rhythm he had gotten into. That loss had very little, if anything, to do with Tannehill. The same people "liking" this post would "laugh" if you replaced QB with RB and defended another player in this regard. If you limit a RB the chances to run, it takes away their effectiveness. All RBs need to be allowed to into a rhythm. This is an argument with preconceived ideas and sides taken. titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted April 30 Author Report Share Posted April 30 39 minutes ago, heyitsmeallen said: Not necessarily… you’ve been wrong plenty. Although I hope it’s true. My opinion on QBs is flawless Supernope, ChesterCopperpot1, Jamalisms, and 1 other 2 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperFreak90 Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 22 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: My opinion on QBs is flawless Next thing you know, the Titans will have to retire 1 again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 29 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: My opinion on QBs is flawless Since you're being so precise... it begs the question... what opinion of yours do you think is not flawless... bizzyeddie 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreepingDeath Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 Someone do an analysis of the draft + offseason-so-far for the defense (the Titans official podcast mentioned that Simmons and Hooker are the two longest-tenured vets drafted by the Titans) and special teams (this was a glaring weakness only overshadowed by Levis). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puck Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 no reason why Moon's number can't still be "retired" as an Oiler # and Ward wear it as a Titan. same with 34, etc... as long as there's not an Oiler jersey with Ward's name on it with the #1. on a Titans jersey, sure go ahead there's only two #'s that (arguably) shouldn't be issued on Titans jerseys and that's 9 and 27 the dumbest shit regarding retiring numbers is Shitdeur Sanders Colorado #2, that's fkn ridiculous Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 7 hours ago, Hyperion said: I hope the Patriots suck mega dick. He won't like it and will make them pay dearly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 1 hour ago, SuperFreak90 said: Next thing you know, the Titans will have to retire 1 again. It will be really awkward if ward is either terrible or good enough for the number to be retired for him as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 1 hour ago, CreepingDeath said: Someone do an analysis of the draft + offseason-so-far for the defense (the Titans official podcast mentioned that Simmons and Hooker are the two longest-tenured vets drafted by the Titans) and special teams (this was a glaring weakness only overshadowed by Levis). Iv looked at all the evidence and it looks like they still have work to do. CreepingDeath, and Supernope 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 Daniel Jeremiah did a good job on the Rich Eisen Show compartmentalizing Ward the person/prospect with his realistic forecast with how things might go for him on this current Titans roster in 2025. Jeremiah has no concerns whatsoever about how Ward is going to handle the tough times when in all likelihood this team goes on a losing streak at some point in 2025. Jeremiah also rightfully pointed out there is still some major work to do roster wise compared to the true championship contenders. (The Titans/Ward stuff starts around the 4:50m mark) Justafan, and TheChosenTitan 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 2 hours ago, OILERMAN said: My opinion on QBs is flawless You said Tannehill was better than McNair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 24 minutes ago, XAEA12 said: You said Tannehill was better than McNair. Over that 2 year stretch he was, and nothing but nostalgia should make anyone think otherwise. OILERMAN, Kcroy420, BudsOilers, and 1 other 2 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.