Trump’s 2nd term: American Carnage

[LongTimeFan]

53 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

Do you agree that the video Trump shared was racist?

The election fraud portion which was 99.5% of it or the 0.5%?

 

The Obama monkey is definitely a racist trope. So then its goes to if you believe it was intentional or not. That's where opinions differ. If you already hate Trump, then it was 1000% intentional in your eyes.

 

Now, is the entire video racist or just lazy comedy? From the parts that I have seen, its just a hate Dem video, so lazy comedy.

[reo]

1 hour ago, Little Earl said:

 

And how many votes would demented Biden have gotten if not forced out?

 

But Biden WAS forced out. Trump is still president. 

[Mythos27]

1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said:

The election fraud portion which was 99.5% of it or the 0.5%?

 

The Obama monkey is definitely a racist trope. So then its goes to if you believe it was intentional or not. That's where opinions differ. If you already hate Trump, then it was 1000% intentional in your eyes.

 

Now, is the entire video racist or just lazy comedy? From the parts that I have seen, its just a hate Dem video, so lazy comedy.

Ok. So you agree the video was racist. Would you agree then that the white house downplayed blatant racism by referring to the reaction as "fake outrage"?

[IsntLifeFunny]

Lazy comedy to insert characters who've never been in the Lion King into a racist trope video somehow spliced into the President's video at the exact second of blatant racism, delivered to tens of millions of people, is obviously neither racist nor the President's issue! 

[Jamalisms]

Totally shocked that the dumbest motherfucker can't bring himself to admit blatant racism is a problem. 

 

Shallow, morally deficient, disingenuous at every turn.

[LongTimeFan]

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

Ok. So you agree the video was racist. Would you agree then that the white house downplayed blatant racism by referring to the reaction as "fake outrage"?

I didn't call either video racist. I agreed depicting black people as apes is a racist trope. And lazy "comedy". Are the 3 seconds about the Obamas racist, yep. Are the other 5 minutes in the White House video racist, nope. Are the other 2 minutes in the AI generated video racist, nope. Lazy comedy, yep.

 

Two things can be true at once. Do 3 seconds of racism make the entire video(s) racist? 

 

And yes, the White House reaction was horrid. 

[Mythos27]

1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said:

I didn't call either video racist. I agreed depicting black people as apes is a racist trope. And lazy "comedy". Are the 3 seconds about the Obamas racist, yep. Are the other 5 minutes in the White House video racist, nope. Are the other 2 minutes in the AI generated video racist, nope. Lazy comedy, yep.

 

Two things can be true at once. Do 3 seconds of racism make the entire video(s) racist? 

 

And yes, the White House reaction was horrid. 

If someone created a video that was 99% about how awful conservatives using generic stereotypes everyone has heard before and then in the last 3 seconds they showed a cartoon of a drag queen turning a kid trans as a joke, is that video about forcing a trans agenda? Which part of that video would you focus on the most?

[OILERMAN]

It's also funny the moron president is posting a video about election fraud when he's the one who tried to steal the election with the fake electoral scheme and asking for 11+K votes in GA. 

 

And actually arguing whether posting the Obama's as Apes is racist is laughable. That's why they lied and said a staffer did it

[LongTimeFan]

2 hours ago, Mythos27 said:

If someone created a video that was 99% about how awful conservatives using generic stereotypes everyone has heard before and then in the last 3 seconds they showed a cartoon of a drag queen turning a kid trans as a joke, is that video about forcing a trans agenda? Which part of that video would you focus on the most?

Tbh, I wouldn't care about a hypothetical video you described. Now if its a car repair video, I'm in.

 

I believe you are African American and understand you would be more sensitive to such things.  If I meet a racist in person I tend to ignore them if they are just spewing hate. 

[Starkiller]

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/10/politics/jury-declines-to-indict-lawmakers-illegal-orders-video?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=missions&utm_source=reddit
 
A federal grand jury on Tuesday declined to indict Democratic lawmakers who posted a video urging service members and intelligence officials to disobey any illegal orders from the Trump administration, according to two people familiar with the matter.

 

The Justice Department’s case focused on a 90-second video clip that featured six democrats, including Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly. The video, which outraged the Trump administration, had warned that “threats to our Constitution” are coming “from right here at home,” and repeatedly urged the military and intelligence community to “refuse illegal orders.”

 

The declination is a rebuke of the administration’s efforts to paint the six lawmakers — all of whom served in either the military or intelligence services — as dangerously undermining the president’s authority as commander in chief.

 

It was not immediately clear which of the lawmakers were facing indictments. CNN has asked the Justice Department for comment.

 

And while the indictment was rejected by the grand jury, it is also an extraordinary escalation of the Justice Department’s willingness to prosecute who speak about against President Donald Trump and his administration’s actions.

[Callidus]

4 hours ago, Starkiller said:

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/10/politics/jury-declines-to-indict-lawmakers-illegal-orders-video?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=missions&utm_source=reddit
 
A federal grand jury on Tuesday declined to indict Democratic lawmakers who posted a video urging service members and intelligence officials to disobey any illegal orders from the Trump administration, according to two people familiar with the matter.

 

The Justice Department’s case focused on a 90-second video clip that featured six democrats, including Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly. The video, which outraged the Trump administration, had warned that “threats to our Constitution” are coming “from right here at home,” and repeatedly urged the military and intelligence community to “refuse illegal orders.”

 

The declination is a rebuke of the administration’s efforts to paint the six lawmakers — all of whom served in either the military or intelligence services — as dangerously undermining the president’s authority as commander in chief.

 

It was not immediately clear which of the lawmakers were facing indictments. CNN has asked the Justice Department for comment.

 

And while the indictment was rejected by the grand jury, it is also an extraordinary escalation of the Justice Department’s willingness to prosecute who speak about against President Donald Trump and his administration’s actions.

That should have been as controversial as telling people they are allowed to wipe their ass.

 

If you got mad its because you smell like shit. 

Edited Wednesday at 09:35 AM by Callidus

[reo]

 

 

 

 

Most corrupt administration in the history of the US.

 

 

[Come on Titans]

10 minutes ago, reo said:

 

Most corrupt administration in the history of the US.

 

 

IMO, more corrupt than all other administrations combined.

[Come on Titans]

[oldschool]

20 hours ago, Callidus said:

See, there is 1 vote. 

 

His response is the most clear cut example of it. No real argument, just what about (insert one of the following) Biden, Obama, Hilary, the Clintons, or Pelosi.