Strunk'sDessert Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 He's locking up most of his base? Bold move, Cotton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 On 7/24/2025 at 3:14 PM, LongTimeFan said: If Brennan, Clapper and Comey see jail time it would be quite satisfying. Let me remove the suspense; they won't. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 Time for guillotines to make a comeback. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 Starkiller, IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 Gabbard essentially threw Bondi under the bus in order to curry favor with Trump. At some point, Bondi will have to explain why no one in the Obama administration is being arrested based on the info Gabbard sent her. OILERMAN, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 31 minutes ago, ctm said: Gabbard essentially threw Bondi under the bus in order to curry favor with Trump. At some point, Bondi will have to explain why no one in the Obama administration is being arrested based on the info Gabbard sent her. Just a temporary diversion to hide the seedy connections between Trump and Epstein MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 26 Author Report Share Posted July 26 37 minutes ago, ctm said: Gabbard essentially threw Bondi under the bus in order to curry favor with Trump. At some point, Bondi will have to explain why no one in the Obama administration is being arrested based on the info Gabbard sent her. I think you underestimate how far Bondi will go to appease the Mad King. Nothing is going to stop them from opening an official investigation. And Trump loves to prosecute his enemies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 26 Author Report Share Posted July 26 9 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: Just a temporary diversion to hide the seedy connections between Trump and Epstein It’s definitely a diversion, but they are inevitably going to escalate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Starkiller said: I think you underestimate how far Bondi will go to appease the Mad King. Nothing is going to stop them from opening an official investigation. And Trump loves to prosecute his enemies. Which is all performance BS. I want to hear Bondi explain to maga why no one is indicted. See @Little Earl meme post with Obama behind bars. Expectations have been raised. Same principle as Epstein. Explain why it's not happening? Bondi will be asked about it in the September congressional hearing. Edited July 26 by ctm OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 26 Report Share Posted July 26 9 hours ago, Starkiller said: It’s definitely a diversion, but they are inevitably going to escalate I don't think they can. There is absolutely no case. In fact it would just remind everyone how much the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. Trump already said Obama was lucky the Supreme ruled you can't prosecute a president in the line of duty. He's already backing off. They'll just talk about it IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted July 27 Author Report Share Posted July 27 (edited) 2 hours ago, OILERMAN said: I don't think they can. There is absolutely no case. In fact it would just remind everyone how much the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. Trump already said Obama was lucky the Supreme ruled you can't prosecute a president in the line of duty. He's already backing off. They'll just talk about it It’s not just about being able to win a case, which obviously Trump can’t because it’s ridiculous. You can punish political opponents simply by bringing prosecution and forcing them to pay crazy legal fees. Trump is basically able to weaponize the DOJ as a taxpayer funded attack squad. He can’t be countersued directly as president, and if anyone does have to pay damages then it will likely be picked up by the taxpayers. And it’s red meat for his retard base who otherwise are talking about Epstein. Edited July 27 by Starkiller Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzTitan Posted July 27 Report Share Posted July 27 A President would have to use personal funds to defend themselves for actions taken while President? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted July 27 Report Share Posted July 27 40 minutes ago, OzTitan said: A President would have to use personal funds to defend themselves for actions taken while President? Probably not in this wacko world IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 27 Report Share Posted July 27 MadMax 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted July 27 Report Share Posted July 27 (edited) 5 hours ago, OILERMAN said: Gabbard is forcing Bondi to explain why another baseless conspiracy theory is just that.....baseless. And btw, Gabbard doesn't even have a law degree. Why would anyone take her word that there is sufficient evidence for an indictment? It's lock her up v2.0 and that ended up getting Session fired because he couldn't and wouldn't do anything. Edited July 27 by ctm OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.