MadMax Posted October 17, 2023 Report Share Posted October 17, 2023 4 minutes ago, reo said: They apparently actually talked about repercussions in court today. There's a reason why he's complying atm. He won't for long. He can't. This is so fun to watch. reo, and ChemEngr79 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 18, 2023 Report Share Posted October 18, 2023 (edited) Trump Committed ‘Egregious’ Intelligence Breach October 18, 2023 at 7:58 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 2 Comments “Donald Trump’s decision to declassify evidence given by ex-British spy Christopher Steele over the former U.S. president’s alleged links with Russia led to the disappearance of two sources, Steele said in court documents made public on Tuesday,” Reuters reports. “Steele said in a witness statement that Trump’s decision to declassify his 2017 testimony to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation was ‘one of the most egregious breaches of intelligence rules and protocol by the US government in recent times.'” Said Steele: “Two of the named Russian sources have not been seen or heard of since.” https://politicalwire.com/2023/10/18/ex-spy-says-trump-committed-egregious-intelligence-breach/ Edited October 18, 2023 by reo OILERMAN, and IsntLifeFunny 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted October 18, 2023 Report Share Posted October 18, 2023 5 hours ago, reo said: Trump Committed ‘Egregious’ Intelligence Breach October 18, 2023 at 7:58 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 2 Comments “Donald Trump’s decision to declassify evidence given by ex-British spy Christopher Steele over the former U.S. president’s alleged links with Russia led to the disappearance of two sources, Steele said in court documents made public on Tuesday,” Reuters reports. “Steele said in a witness statement that Trump’s decision to declassify his 2017 testimony to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation was ‘one of the most egregious breaches of intelligence rules and protocol by the US government in recent times.'” Said Steele: “Two of the named Russian sources have not been seen or heard of since.” https://politicalwire.com/2023/10/18/ex-spy-says-trump-committed-egregious-intelligence-breach/ The strange part is if you showed this to a Republican and they were to accept it as truth, which they wouldn't, but let's say they did, they would still place the ego of Donald Trump before our intelligence assets. MadMax, reo, and Starkiller 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 18, 2023 Report Share Posted October 18, 2023 9 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said: The strange part is if you showed this to a Republican and they were to accept it as truth, which they wouldn't, but let's say they did, they would still place the ego of Donald Trump before our intelligence assets. They've been convinced the whole Steele Dossier was fake to begin w/ so they don't care if those sourses were killed. OILERMAN, IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 20, 2023 Report Share Posted October 20, 2023 A U.S. judge on Friday temporarily lifted a partial gag order she had imposed limiting Donald Trump's public statements about the federal criminal case in which the former president is accusing of illegally attempting to undo his 2020 election loss. Acting on the same day that a New York state judge fined Trump $5,000 for violating a gag order in a civil trial, U.S. District Tanya Chutkan in Washington put on hold the order she issued earlier in the week while she considers the former president's request for a longer pause while he challenges it. Lawyers for Trump on Friday asked Chutkan to lift the restrictions while he asks a U.S. appeals court to strike down an order by the judge that they called "breathtakingly overbroad." Chutkan on Monday barred Trump from making public statements that "target" Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is prosecuting the case, and members of his staff. The order also prohibits Trump from making comments disparaging court staff and potential witnesses in the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
begooode Posted October 24, 2023 Report Share Posted October 24, 2023 Starkiller, IsntLifeFunny, and ctm 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted October 24, 2023 Report Share Posted October 24, 2023 Republicans continue to rat out Trump. reo, and Omar 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 25, 2023 Report Share Posted October 25, 2023 IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 26, 2023 Report Share Posted October 26, 2023 Smith wants the stay on the gag order removed and have the conditions of his release dependent on him abiding by it. begooode, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 26, 2023 Report Share Posted October 26, 2023 Honestly this probably needs to be the tactic when addressing any republican. MadMax, and CreepingDeath 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 27, 2023 Report Share Posted October 27, 2023 Jack Smith gets it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 28, 2023 Report Share Posted October 28, 2023 A U.S. judge on Friday asked former President Donald Trump whether he wants to appear on television when he stands trial in federal court on charges of attempting to overturn his 2020 election defeat. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington asked Trump’s lawyers to give their opinion by Nov. 10 on media requests to broadcast the trial, which is scheduled to begin in March 2024. In two separate filings, NBC News and a coalition of 19 media organizations and press advocacy groups argue that the public has a right to see an unprecedented trial of a former U.S. president who is also the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican nomination. They argue that a federal rule barring broadcast of criminal proceedings is unconstitutional. Prosecutors have said in court filings that they oppose the effort but have not explained why. They are due to file their argument by Nov. 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted October 31, 2023 Report Share Posted October 31, 2023 More indictments will be coming. OILERMAN, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strunk'sDessert Posted October 31, 2023 Report Share Posted October 31, 2023 1 hour ago, reo said: More indictments will be coming. Sadly, I think anyone outside of any sort of echo chamber knew this to be true without the hard evidence. Nonetheless, it's chilling to hear it out loud. Also, I hope they're all held accountable, but I doubt we'll see that day for many of these people. reo, and OILERMAN 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted October 31, 2023 Report Share Posted October 31, 2023 On 10/27/2023 at 9:16 PM, Starkiller said: A U.S. judge on Friday asked former President Donald Trump whether he wants to appear on television when he stands trial in federal court on charges of attempting to overturn his 2020 election defeat. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in Washington asked Trump’s lawyers to give their opinion by Nov. 10 on media requests to broadcast the trial, which is scheduled to begin in March 2024. In two separate filings, NBC News and a coalition of 19 media organizations and press advocacy groups argue that the public has a right to see an unprecedented trial of a former U.S. president who is also the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican nomination. They argue that a federal rule barring broadcast of criminal proceedings is unconstitutional. Prosecutors have said in court filings that they oppose the effort but have not explained why. They are due to file their argument by Nov. 3. Safety of the jurors? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.