Jump to content

Titans New Stadium Discussion


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Amy said:

Thank You.  Was confused why they have to vote three times and a week apart 

The metro charter requires bills to be placed before the council and debated and voted 3 times before being sent to the mayor’s office for finalization. Next week is gonna be a marathon bc a public hearing will be heard where each side has 2 hours to present. 
 

if you want to stay up to date, follow @cstephenson731 on twitter. She covers metro council meetings every Tuesday night. She’s been doing great work providing coverage. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Bud on suicide watch

I'm still holding out hope Austin or San Antonio can swoop in at the last minute!

Get rekt     

Posted Images

14 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

Do you not see why people have called you out on this? You’ve been openly rooting for it. You’ve been absolutely giddy about the possibility. No one is denying the NFL always wins. If the NFL and team wanted to stick it to the city then they would have unilaterally renewed their lease and said 100% fun the contractually obligated upgrades out of the general fund. 

I said from the start of the NFL will get what they want whether it be Nashville or someplace else that will.

 

People on here actually did deny that the NFL always wins. The claim was that the NFL coveted the Nashville market and so it’s different than every other city that they’ve been out and left, that’s what was so hysterical. 

 

I was rooting for the chaos just for the fun of it but I figured the city would cave in the end, which of course they did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

The metro charter requires bills to be placed before the council and debated and voted 3 times before being sent to the mayor’s office for finalization. Next week is gonna be a marathon bc a public hearing will be heard where each side has 2 hours to present. 
 

if you want to stay up to date, follow @cstephenson731 on twitter. She covers metro council meetings every Tuesday night. She’s been doing great work providing coverage. 

Thank You.  Interesting.  No longer live in Nashville so do not pay attention to local Nashville politics anymore but I will follow her 

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Amy said:

Thank You.  Was confused why they have to vote three times and a week apart 

The reason for the voting three times and a week apart is because the second vote was deferred to a later date. The second vote is the most important vote, and the third vote is just a formality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

Do you not see why people have called you out on this? You’ve been openly rooting for it. You’ve been absolutely giddy about the possibility. No one is denying the NFL always wins. If the NFL and team wanted to stick it to the city then they would have unilaterally renewed their lease and said 100% fun the contractually obligated upgrades out of the general fund. 

I would think saying something possibly happening would be hilarious 50 different times would denote you're hoping it happens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BudsOilers said:

It was always about the funding.  The NFL and team wanted a new stadium regardless of location.  Nashville is not some strategic market for them….

They have put a lot of effort in to the Nashville market.  Sure, they would leave if it came to it but they don't want to.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Justafan said:

They have put a lot of effort in to the Nashville market.  Sure, they would leave if it came to it but they don't want to.  

 

But not more than in other markets.  The draft hosting a few years back was pushed by AAS.  The NFL and most owners do not want to leave their cities.  It's always the economics of the stadium - lease terms, revenue streams, etc.  

 

At the end of the day, the city/state will be providing the most public money in history to build a stadium.  The funny thing is that the team part from the actual ownership is pretty small - of the 840 M the team is putting in, about 450 M will come from PSL sales and 200 M is in a low interest loan provided by the NFL.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

I would think saying something possibly happening would be hilarious 50 different times would denote you're hoping it happens. 

 

Of course it would have been funny.  Mainly because of the hubris some have about Nashville and total ignorance on how the team ended up in TN to begin with.  The fact that so many on here got upset with me saying it would be hilarious and that I hoped it happened only made it funnier.

 

I said from the get go I expected the stadium deal to come through.  I've also said many times I don't care where they play.  I've not lived in the city they've played in since 1978.

 

Where the division in the road was you locals claiming the city had any kind of leverage in the situation and that the NFL would act differently "because it's Nashville".  Just yesterday the one retard claimed the team would have to take the city's deal that tried to jack with the non-football revenue stream.....Of course, the deal approved last night turned the 10% to 3% and exempted any college sports events and the CMA fest.....

Edited by BudsOilers
Link to post
Share on other sites

More details on the vote last night and changes to the deal through amendments here:  https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/davidson/2023/04/19/2-1b-titans-stadium-deal-advances-to-final-vote-in-nashville-council/70127041007/

 

The Gamble compromise changed the ticket fee revenue economics from the city attempting to get 400 M in revenue funneled to them to a much lower amount estimated to be $ 120 M.  

 

Quote

Council member Jennifer Gamble proposed a successful amendment defining "team rent" as the greater of either $3 or 3% of the value per non-NFL ticket. A successful amendment from Council member Freddie O'Connell diverted any additional "team rent" past the $3 dedicated to stadium maintenance toward the city's general fund, meaning that money could be used through Metro departments to fund things like sidewalks, road improvements and other items council members report as priorities for their constituents.

 

Under the amendments, several non-NFL events are exempt from the ticket fee:

College events (including Tennessee State University football games and the Music City Bowl)

High school sporting events

CMA events, ACM events, the Grammy Awards and WWE special events.

 

Jameson indicated this version of the "team rent" component of the deal would be a "compromise" acceptable to the Titans and entertainment industry stakeholders.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've got some real gems on that council....some idiot thought they could get naming rights revenue?

 

Quote

The council also rejected amendments that would have given Metro half of the naming rights revenues for the new stadium, or would have evenly split the costs of developing the campus surrounding the stadium between Metro and the team.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2023 at 12:15 PM, Stan said:

Where in San Diego ?


Where would they play? I mean they could play at the new SDSU stadium short term while a stadium is being built. 
 

Logical areas are in the midway district inbetween Old Town and the airport. Great skyline views right there and clear view of the water. They are already planning on clearing many of those old military command centers over there. They already are trying to invest in building a Top Golf at that site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

What's the deal with this city council?? 

 

 

They are not serious people. As long as the 27 supporters show up it shouldn’t be an issue. Of course that’s a big “IF”. 
 

imagine not showing up to do your job because you didn’t get your way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

They are not serious people. As long as the 27 supporters show up it shouldn’t be an issue. Of course that’s a big “IF”. 
 

imagine not showing up to do your job because you didn’t get your way. 

 

Sure but what's crazy to me is that dragging this out only puts the cost estimates at risk.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...