Jonboy Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 1 hour ago, OILERMAN said: Adams and Hooker are both good for different reasons I would love to know how they really want to use Byard. That would probably tell us if they'd prefer Hooker or Adams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Jonboy said: I would love to know how they really want to use Byard. That would probably tell us if they'd prefer Hooker or Adams. If they are supposed to be interchangeable then Adams is more of a fit, but maybe they change if they draft Hooker who knows just don't want him anywhere near the line of scrimmage. Edited March 4, 2017 by Huston Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post OILERMAN Posted March 4, 2017 Popular Post Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jonboy said: I would love to know how they really want to use Byard. That would probably tell us if they'd prefer Hooker or Adams. Byard would likely play high FS if Adams is drafted and SS if Hooker is drafted, the good thing is he can do both kyle021, efus50, wiscotitansfan, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Single high safety is more difficult to find then a SS. Byard has show on the NFL level he can excel playing a SS role, but He really hasn't been given the opportunity by DLB to prove he can play as a single high safety. wiscotitansfan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliTitan3518 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Hooker in the middle of the field would improve our defense a lot. I like the idea of having Adams and Byard being interchangeable but I think Byard is a far better SS. Plus having the middle of the field covered makes our corners so much better. Dmeade- 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonboy Posted March 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 What's interesting about Byard is he was more of a FS in college and had quite a few picks, IIRC. He started out the year doing mostly that for us and as the year went on, he played more SS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle021 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 17 hours ago, OILERMAN said: Byard would likely play high FS if Adams is drafted and SS if Hooker is drafted, the good thing is he can do both Could also play NB or Joker role if we went either safety and have Adams/Hooker at FS and Searcy SS Byard can line up 1:1 with WRs/TEs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyle021 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 15 hours ago, Jonboy said: What's interesting about Byard is he was more of a FS in college and had quite a few picks, IIRC. He started out the year doing mostly that for us and as the year went on, he played more SS. 19 in college 0 here i blame lack of rusher at DE across Casey, lack of ILB and lack of cBs 1-3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 20 hours ago, Titans279 said: Seems like we can't go wrong with Adams or Hooker. We can. Hooker is horrible at taking angles in the run game. He would be a liability in run D. He is a pure centerfielder and would be best on pass downs....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 18 hours ago, CaliTitan3518 said: Hooker in the middle of the field would improve our defense a lot. I like the idea of having Adams and Byard being interchangeable but I think Byard is a far better SS. Plus having the middle of the field covered makes our corners so much better. The reason why is he can do both and we do not have a physical S. That is why I want Adams and not Hooker. Hooker is horrible against the run. Byard and Adams would be dynamite duo. Byard needs to play FS and Adams SS. No1TitansFan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Hooker isn't horrible against the run. Bongo doesn't like Hooker in order to pump his lsu prospect. Take off your purple shaded glasses off. headhunter 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Hooker is horrible on run fits because he is inexperienced.......I like his pass skills......I could see him playing slot CB his rookie year until he is trained how to stop the run.......it is the one spot he really is like a four rounder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 33 minutes ago, Bongo59 said: Hooker is horrible on run fits because he is inexperienced.......I like his pass skills......I could see him playing slot CB his rookie year until he is trained how to stop the run.......it is the one spot he really is like a four rounder. Exactly, major liability against the run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 S have to be able to do both well......Hooker is elite in the pass game and remedial in the run game. You have to know that when you draft him. Adams is elite in both. Tape shows it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 How do you guys feel about Reddick at 18??? titanskick8851 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.