Jump to content

Around The NFL: Off-Season News and Rumors


titanskick8851

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Callidus said:

The watch was a bad example. But anything that can be triangulated should be quite advanced enough already. As for the knee being down and what not. I'm not sure it would be that hard to compare the time stamp on the film with what the ball transmitted to know where to say it's down. 

I'm sure you think that's easy to triangulate to a bunch of refs on the field. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Im crying 

lol    

Obviously not since we already have the worst backup QB in the world.

Posted Images

Just now, IsntLifeFunny said:

I'm sure you think that's easy to triangulate to a bunch of refs on the field. 

The refs won't be the ones doing the tech shit and even if they were it should be automated. We don't need ww2 pathfinders to figure out where the fucking ball landed lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Callidus said:

The refs won't be the ones doing the tech shit and even if they were it should be automated. We don't need ww2 pathfinders to figure out where the fucking ball landed lol

I'm sure you think that's easy to implement. It isn't. What they're doing now is literally just using it for measurements. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

I'm sure you think that's easy to implement. It isn't. What they're doing now is literally just using it for measurements. 

How do you think they measure the location of an eltronic device? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Explain it to me and how it can be relayed down to down to the officiating crew. 

You measure you distance to the desired target from 3 locations and by using geometry you can know it's exact location as long as it's between them. As for telling them where to mark it. Radio them the yard marker and then treat it like a punt. Have then walk from he center line or hash marks till they are in the right spot and tell them to stop. If they don't care to do it that way they can just have the refs mark it down then adjust it forward or back using the data for first downs or ever down. 

 

This isn't that difficult 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Callidus said:

You measure you distance to the desired target from 3 locations and by using geometry you can know it's exact location as long as it's between them. As for telling them where to mark it. Radio them the yard marker and then treat it like a punt. Have then walk from he center line or hash marks till they are in the right spot and tell them to stop. If they don't care to do it that way they can just have the refs mark it down then adjust it forward or back using the data for first downs or ever down. 

 

This isn't that difficult 

As I've said I'm sure you think that is a simple process, which you're still negating the ball moving say as a player extends but his knee is down, and it not slowing up the game. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TF_Titan said:

On the list of all the problems with how the NFL game is officiated...getting the first down measurement more accurate is closer to the bottom of the list than the top.

Let's go ahead and add in triangulating positions on a down to down basis. Sounds great. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Let's go ahead and add in triangulating positions on a down to down basis. Sounds great. 

It's not some great feat of engineering magic man. It's a glorified GPS receiver. 

 

Edit: Not that GPS isn't very impressive just it's 1970s tech. 

Edited by Callidus
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/20/2024 at 7:31 AM, LongTimeFan said:

Yeah, I have a couple of Brazilian friends and they tell me that nobody gives a shit about the NFL. They barely support anything beside the Brazilian national soccer team and their local cub.

 

I can't imaginethtat anyone in Australia giving two fucks.

Brazil and Australia are like two different worlds...

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Now that makes a lot of sense. On a down to down basis I think it would unnecessarily slow up the game.

It will be funny if they stick to eyeballing it 99% of the time (which will be inaccurate by feet most of the time lol) and switch to using down to the 1/4 inch accurate tech sometimes (important plays). It's like rounding all your calculations to the nearest 10 and then reporting your final answer to two decimal points lol

Edited by Titans279
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Callidus said:

It's not some great feat of engineering magic man. It's a glorified GPS receiver. 

 

Edit: Not that GPS isn't very impressive just it's 1970s tech. 

 

Today is the day I learned @IsntLifeFunny for a younger dude knows jack shit about technology. a little scary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Callidus said:

You measure you distance to the desired target from 3 locations and by using geometry you can know it's exact location as long as it's between them. As for telling them where to mark it. Radio them the yard marker and then treat it like a punt. Have then walk from he center line or hash marks till they are in the right spot and tell them to stop. If they don't care to do it that way they can just have the refs mark it down then adjust it forward or back using the data for first downs or ever down. 

 

This isn't that difficult 

 

For the record...putting a transmitter in the ball is not a trivial thing. Placing one on the end (or on both ends) isn't sufficient. It would have to accurately locate the point on the surface of the ball that is closest to the goal line...which could literally be any point on the ball's surface. I'm not saying it's not a solvable problem, but it's definitely not trivial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TF_Titan said:

 

For the record...putting a transmitter in the ball is not a trivial thing. Placing one on the end (or on both ends) isn't sufficient. It would have to accurately locate the point on the surface of the ball that is closest to the goal line...which could literally be any point on the ball's surface. I'm not saying it's not a solvable problem, but it's definitely not trivial.

True, but 6 should be the logical max I would think. 4 around the center and one on either end. That would give you a good skeleton like those ping pong ball suits. And knowing the average size of the ball you can input all of that intonthe computer and it should do the rest of the work. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...