Iran

[reo]

1 hour ago, LongTimeFan said:

Reo doesnt have a clue what he is talking about regarding inspections.

 

"No, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is not allowed "wherever they want" in Iran. Access is limited to declared nuclear sites, and in early 2026, Iran restricted access following military tensions. While the IAEA operates under a Safeguards Agreement, Iran has restricted inspectors from visiting specific sites impacted by attacks, such as Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. 

 

Restricted Access: Following military strikes in 2025, Iran's parliament passed a law allowing the government to withhold cooperation, severely limiting the IAEA's oversight capabilities, notes the Arms Control Association.

 

Inspections Blocked: As of early 2026, the IAEA reported a "loss of continuity of knowledge" at key sites, meaning they cannot verify the status of Iran’s uranium stockpile, says AP News and Reuters.

 

Failed Explanations: The IAEA has expressed concern over man-made uranium particles found at multiple undeclared locations, for which Iran has not provided credible explanations, reports UN News.

 

Negotiated Access: While a 2025 agreement was meant to grant access to all facilities, Iran has continued to block access to key sites, insisting the IAEA’s presence is tied to security assurances, says Iran International. 

 

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

 

The IAEA relies on negotiated access and, while they can request access to other sites, Iran often denies these requests based on security concerns or claims that the sites are not part of the official safeguards agreement. "

 

 

I wasn't talking about 2025 or 2026. 

 

I was talking about this:

https://www.armscontrol.org/2015-08/section-3-understanding-jcpoa

 

 

1. Full supply-chain tracking (this is the biggest factor)

Inspectors weren’t just watching enrichment sites, they were watching:

• Uranium mines
• Processing facilities
• Centrifuge manufacturing
• Storage and transport

Meaning: to secretly build a bomb, Iran would have to recreate an entire hidden nuclear supply chain.

That’s extremely difficult without detection.

• The deal created “multilayered monitoring of every element of the nuclear fuel supply chain”

2. Constant monitoring + data systems

At declared sites:

• 24/7 cameras
• Sensors detecting radiation or tampering
• Seals on equipment that alert inspectors if broken

Tracking of nuclear material quantities

So if uranium “goes missing,” it’s noticed.

 

3. Nuclear material leaves fingerprints (this matters for the 24-day delay)

This is the technical reason inspectors weren’t overly worried about delays:

Nuclear work leaves microscopic radioactive traces

These can linger in:

• dust
• soil
• surfaces

Even after cleanup, traces are often still detectable.

That’s why experts argued:

• You can’t just “wipe it down and hide it”

4. Intelligence + surveillance outside inspections

The IAEA wasn’t working blind.

They also used:

• Satellite imagery
• Trade/import monitoring
• Intelligence from the U.S., Israel, Europe, etc.

Example: suspicious construction, unusual procurement, or movement of materials could trigger inspections.

 

5. “Breakout time” was the real safety net

The deal didn’t just rely on detection, it slowed Iran down:

• Reduced uranium stockpile ~98%
• Limited enrichment levels
• Cut centrifuges drastically

Result:

It would take ~1 year to build a bomb (instead of a few months)

 

That gave time to:

• detect
• respond
• reimpose sanctions

 

 

Edited Sunday at 01:00 AM by reo

[LongTimeFan]

Like I said @Titandanthese guys dont have a clue about what they are talking about. 

 

Just blind hatred for Trump.

 

They have twisted themselves to believe what a terrorist lying regime tells them. Truly amazing the depths of their stupidity. 

 

 

[OzTitan]

It's extremely unlikely Iran was going to ever be able to make nuclear weapons in secret or get anywhere close to it in secret. If you're trying to suck off Trump, you'd be better off arguing the system worked, and we've reached this point because it was detected because it wasn't able to be done in secret (if it was happening at all, evidence pending?).

 

Obviously a big part of backing out of the deal was being able to claim secrecy in their actions, which is a great selling point to the morons (as we can see here).

 

The real question is, if Trump eventually strikes a new "deal", how familiar is it going to look?

[reo]

Gonna be a lot harder to get a deal once Trump proves that the US can't take out the regime.

[Rogue]

12 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

They have twisted themselves to believe what a terrorist lying regime tells them. Truly amazing the depths of their stupidity. 

You have described yourself to a tee.  It is indeed truly amazing the depths of your stupidity.  

[IsntLifeFunny]

Did this idiot just post a link to the IAEA getting headed off by Iran after the US struck them the first time? Idiots. Purely and unadulterated. 

 

The idea of an agreement with that oversight is if they don't go along with it sanctions are immediately reinstituted and it then builds coalition if it hits trip wires in the agreement. That's how diplomacy works you fuckin troglodyte. 

[IsntLifeFunny]

11 minutes ago, OzTitan said:

It's extremely unlikely Iran was going to ever be able to make nuclear weapons in secret or get anywhere close to it in secret. If you're trying to suck off Trump, you'd be better off arguing the system worked, and we've reached this point because it was detected because it wasn't able to be done in secret (if it was happening at all, evidence pending?).

 

Obviously a big part of backing out of the deal was being able to claim secrecy in their actions, which is a great selling point to the morons (as we can see here).

 

The real question is, if Trump eventually strikes a new "deal", how familiar is it going to look?

The craziest part is they actually had a win on the table. It was there. No uranium enrichment in Iran. Ballistic missile oversight. These negotiations were made by the Trump administration using Oman as the intermediary. They went to war two days after breakthroughs were announced. 

[LongTimeFan]

Imagine being so stupid you believe anything the Iranian terrorist regime says. Thinking that the people of Iran support that regime when they killed tens of thousands of their own people. Hell yeah, kill that wrestler because he doesn't like the regime!! We love that  shit!!

 

Yeah, remember that regime you're rooting for is throwing as many bombs at civilian targets as they can. Yeah, but they wouldn't do it if they had a nuke, right?

 

Fucking idiots.

[IsntLifeFunny]

No one is rooting for the regime dummy.

[OzTitan]

Also no one is believing what they are saying lol it has nothing to do with that.

 

LTF is dumb as dog shit.

[reo]

11 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

Imagine being so stupid you believe anything the Iranian terrorist regime says. Thinking that the people of Iran support that regime when they killed tens of thousands of their own people. Hell yeah, kill that wrestler because he doesn't like the regime!! We love that  shit!!

 

Yeah, remember that regime you're rooting for is throwing as many bombs at civilian targets as they can. Yeah, but they wouldn't do it if they had a nuke, right?

 

Fucking idiots.

 

 

1. Full supply-chain tracking (this is the biggest factor)
2. Constant monitoring + data systems

3. Nuclear material leaves fingerprints (this matters for the 24-day delay)
4. Intelligence + surveillance outside inspections

5. “Breakout time” was the real safety net

Edited Sunday at 01:01 AM by reo

[Rogue]

1 minute ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

No one is rooting for the regime dummy.

LTF is a liar, which makes him appear an idiot.  I mean, he's both.  It's in his blood.  

He's completely oblivious to the fact we started the war, and then wants to cry that Iran retaliated in the way they can.  Situation reversed, he'd totally be on the Iran regime's side.  Is there any doubt?  ANY fucking doubt?  

Like Dan, LTF is not a serious person.  I think they believe they are, but their allegiance is to Trump, and Trump alone.  No matter what happens, NO MATTER WHAT, they will suck the dick of Trump.  They are serious about that, but not about reality.  

[reo]

5 minutes ago, Rogue said:

LTF is a liar, which makes him appear an idiot.  I mean, he's both.  It's in his blood.  

He's completely oblivious to the fact we started the war, and then wants to cry that Iran retaliated in the way they can.  Situation reversed, he'd totally be on the Iran regime's side.  Is there any doubt?  ANY fucking doubt?  

Like Dan, LTF is not a serious person.  I think they believe they are, but their allegiance is to Trump, and Trump alone.  No matter what happens, NO MATTER WHAT, they will suck the dick of Trump.  They are serious about that, but not about reality.  

 

Dan is more serious. It's why i engage w/ him. He's just deeply in the cult and has trouble seeing outside of what they tell him. His biggest problem is that he wants to believe so he convinces himself of anything.

 

LTF is intellectually dishonest.

Edited Sunday at 01:07 AM by reo

[Rogue]

5 minutes ago, reo said:

 

Dan is more serious. It's why i engage w/ him. He's just deeply in the cult and has trouble seeing outside of what they tell him.

 

LTF is intellectually dishonest.

I think both are intellectually dishonet.  Dan may be more engaging, but that doesn't mean he's less intellectually dishonet.  He is that.  Your posts to him are as lost as posts to Tux.  He's not coming back to reality.  

Edited Sunday at 01:08 AM by Rogue

[reo]

1 minute ago, Rogue said:

I think both are intellectually dishonet.  Dan may be more engaging, but that doesn't mean he's less intellectually dishonet.  He is that.  Your posts to him are as lost as posts to Tuz.  He's not coming back to reality.  

 

Dan is a cult member. He engages just like a cult member too.