Jump to content

Biden White House: Year 4


tgo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Titans279 said:

 

I feel like the problem with this is that it ignores how Democrats, and everyone here, did expect BBB to pass. I think you were saying a 2T version would pass at least.

 

It's kind of a post hoc rationalization to say that it was unrealistic. People certainly were acting like it was realistic. Seems weird to then say people can't be upset that something they were told to expect to happen doesn't actually happen.

Sure, it all comes down to the votes not being there (and realistically they never will be for the foreseeable future), but I think you're ignoring that a lot of people understandably feel hoodwinked.


Underlying problem seems to be the American electorate that vote for Republicans en masse all across the board. Party control really shouldn’t be as tight as it is with how totally off the rails and insane the right wing is now. The only reason things are so tight is because the US is chuck full of dumb people. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No I don't think that has anything to do with super rich. It is the top 1.8% of income earners though.    Also if you think the proposals to raise the taxes on people making that much are ex

A couple of years ago, I was  late for a conference call with colleagues in Germany and India. After joining the call and apologizing for being late. Someone from India said, "just be like Trump and s

Voter ID isn't the big issue. The big issue is state law proposals that allow state legislatures to overrule the vote in elections and that take power away from the state's secretaries of state as wel

Posted Images

46 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

I think they had the votes when Manchin delivered an offer to the WH and they rejected it. It was 1.8 trillion if I’m not mistaken. The WH overplayed their hand. If Manchin would have voted for it then so would have Sinema, and I imagine even the left flank would have given in. 

 

I don't think that Manchin's 1.8T deal would have passed as it was proposed because Manchin and Sinema never agreed on the taxes part of it. Their two tax policy wants were just completely incompatible.

They still don't agree. That seems like the biggest obstacle to them trying to salvage any of the parts of BBB they all support (in theory).

 

IMO it gets back to neither of them really cares if any part of BBB passes or not so they have no incentive to compromise.

 

I actually suspect they're happier that nothing passes given the special interests they seem most attached to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, tgo said:


Underlying problem seems to be the American electorate that vote for Republicans en masse all across the board. Party control really shouldn’t be as tight as it is with how totally off the rails and insane the right wing is now. The only reason things are so tight is because the US is chuck full of dumb people. 

 

Take heart! France is possibly about to elect Marine Le Pen, so it's not like it's just us! ?

 

We at least have the excuse that the Senate and Electoral College are significantly biased toward the ignorant country bumpkin vote by design, and the House by gerrymandering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Titans279 said:

 

I feel like the problem with this is that it ignores how Democrats, and everyone here, did expect BBB to pass. I think you were saying a 2T version would pass at least.

 

It's kind of a post hoc rationalization to say that it was unrealistic. People certainly were acting like it was realistic. Seems weird to then say people can't be upset that something they were told to expect to happen doesn't actually happen.

Sure, it all comes down to the votes not being there (and realistically they never will be for the foreseeable future), but I think you're ignoring that a lot of people understandably feel hoodwinked.

 

It would have passed if Schumer and the Whitehouse took Manchin seriously on his red lines. Instead they acted like they had some progressive mandate which they didn't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

I'll agree that Biden misplayed it spectacularly.

 

You mean Schumer who sucks. No wonder McConnell runs circles around him. 

 

Regardless the point stands. Dems delivered a ton but have little to no wriggle room and yet the average voter thinks they should be able to pass everything. It just shows how clueless most voters are. The GOP understands the average voter way better than the Dems do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to reiterate, they failed to pass something that you thought was inevitable and obvious and well within the bounds of expectation. It wasn't even a question. It was a cause of derision to doubt it. Along the way, the president gave his personal guarantee to people that he would get it done and then it didn't happen.

 

 

It's a significant failure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

Just to reiterate, they failed to pass something that you thought was inevitable and obvious and well within the bounds of expectation. It wasn't even a question. It was a cause of derision to doubt it. Along the way, the president gave his personal guarantee to people that he would get it done and then it didn't happen.

 

 

It's a significant failure.

 

The dems fucked it up for sure but don't get it twisted, it was going to pass if they gave Manchin what he wanted rather than think they could browbeat him into voting for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

The dems fucked it up for sure but don't get it twisted, it was going to pass if they gave Manchin what he wanted rather than think they could browbeat him into voting for it.


Maybe. They never had to reconcile Manchin and Sinema’s contradictory tax positions, so we’ll never know if it would have passed. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Titans279 said:


Maybe. They never had to reconcile Manchin and Sinema’s contradictory tax positions, so we’ll never know if it would have passed. 

 

Definitely a fair point. Sinema did signal some movement on tax policy, just not the one that raises the corp rate which most dems agreed to. Further proof the goal should be to make sinema and manchin non deciding votes. Not take your ball and go home like some progressives pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Titans279 said:

 

I don't think that Manchin's 1.8T deal would have passed as it was proposed because Manchin and Sinema never agreed on the taxes part of it. Their two tax policy wants were just completely incompatible.

They still don't agree. That seems like the biggest obstacle to them trying to salvage any of the parts of BBB they all support (in theory).

 

IMO it gets back to neither of them really cares if any part of BBB passes or not so they have no incentive to compromise.

 

I actually suspect they're happier that nothing passes given the special interests they seem most attached to.

Maybe not, and maybe you’re right. We’ll never know. But I have a strong feeling if Manchin had of passed it it would have given cover to Sinema. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • tgo changed the title to Biden White House: Year 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...