Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

His hands are just different. His 0.0% drop rate was no fluke. If the ball touches his hands it just sticks like glue.

Ayomanor was a 4th round project(end of the 4th round). He never should have led the team in targets. Forced targets and playing time on a terrible team with no WRs doesn't equal quality play.  He pla

As long as there is a gaping isle in the store

Posted Images

1 hour ago, NashvilleNinja said:

I once found a lock. It was at the cafe down the block having a coffee with a rock talking about a missing sock it had worn around its cock. It was around 9s o'clock.

 

 

ND0

 

Now you sleep by the dock, below the waves to be forever mocked. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, titanruss said:

Lol at anyone that thinks Ayomanor is not a lock for the final Roster. 


 

He is at best the #5 WR right now. And it remains to be seen if he is any good on special teams. That’s not the makings of a lock. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

He is at best the #5 WR right now. And it remains to be seen if he is any good on special teams. That’s not the makings of a lock. 

 

Ridley isnt coming back next year. Decent chance according to some pundits that Wandale isnt here after 2 years. Borg signed him in his first class and brags on him. He's battling .... no one. And its almost impossible to judge the talent from last year and they know it. 

He's an easy clear lock and you've been swindled by Oman and his Oliver mission. Sure he's gotta play special teams. So? haha. 

 

 

Edited by titanruss
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, titanruss said:

 

Ridley isnt coming back next year. Decent chance according to some pundits that Wandale isnt here after 2 years. Borg signed him in his first class and brags on him. He's battling .... no one. And its almost impossible to judge the talent from last year and they know it. 

He's an easy clear lock and you've been swindled by Oman and his Oliver mission. Sure he's gotta play special teams. So? haha. 

 

 

This would be a decent argument if Ayomanor were a good WR. But if he were a good WR then he would be a lock regardless of Ridley or Robinson or Oliver or anyone else currently on the roster. 
 

The #5 WR has to play special teams. There a very good reason to think that Oliver can beat out Ayomanor for #5 and being active on game days. That’s simply an argument about the value of special teams. But it’s not just about Oliver.
 

Any young guy on the bottom of the depth chart isn’t a lock. He’s a day 3 pick who didn’t produce as a rookie despite being forced into action. He might improve in year 2. He might show that he can contribute on special teams. He might just not get any real competition in camp to make it worth waiving him. Or maybe he struggles again and Daboll doesn’t see any reason to keep him and they replace him with a cheap veteran or a waiver claim.
 

Either way, he probably has a 90% chance of making the roster. So he probably will make the 53, but that’s not a lock…

Edited by Starkiller
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/27/2026 at 7:36 PM, OILERMAN said:

Looking back at Burks and Corey Davis it's easy to see Tate is a different breed

Those two don't need to be mentioned in the same sentence as Tate.  Tate's not cocky, but you see world class athlete in his mannerisms.  Catching deep balls with one hand. Balls neither one of them could catch consistently w/two.  

 

The man's already established as the team's leader. ' Hey #1 pick, we have a few days off.  Pack your bags we are going to Miami to practice.'  That's not normal.  How many rookies walk in and garner that kind of respect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Starkiller said:

being active on game days.

 

This is what I was coming to post. It's not just about the 53 man roster. It's about being active on game days. 

 

Oliver is going to be active and play all the STs units. He can also back-up Tate at the X. Oliver makes the 45 game active. 

 

Ayo is a project. He's not good enough to just be kept as a developmental project. That's what the PS is for. Are you going to keep Ayo on the 53 when he's not going to be active or contribute? No, not knowing everything we know now.

 

Saying Ayo is a lock is just a complete lack of understanding of roster construction

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Starkiller said:

This would be a decent argument if Ayomanor were a good WR. But if he were a good WR then he would be a lock regardless of Ridley or Robinson or Oliver or anyone else currently on the roster. 
 

The #5 WR has to play special teams. There a very good reason to think that Oliver can beat out Ayomanor for #5 and being active on game days. That’s simply an argument about the value of special teams. But it’s not just about Oliver.
 

Any young guy on the bottom of the depth chart isn’t a lock. He’s a day 3 pick who didn’t produce as a rookie despite being forced into action. He might improve in year 2. He might show that he can contribute on special teams. He might just not get any real competition in camp to make it worth waiving him. Or maybe he struggles again and Daboll doesn’t see any reason to keep him and they replace him with a cheap veteran or a waiver claim.
 

Either way, he probably has a 90% chance of making the roster. So he probably will make the 53, but that’s not a lock…


Haha, you're funny. I feel like I'm arguing with a sibling with the lack of paying attention to what has been said.  
 

He will be back regardless of every single WR. - That's what a lock is. 

 

he was a rookie... in an offense where the coach was fired after 5 games... and the new staff was unwanted after... and had a rookie QB... and no one across from him... we've covered this.
 

Yes, WR #5 needs to play ST. So? What's your argument? That he won't?!? Hahahahah.  Again, covered. Even with Restrepo last year this was playing ST when they needed him to. 
 

100% chance outside of a random off the field incident. Stop being silly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

 

This is what I was coming to post. It's not just about the 53 man roster. It's about being active on game days. 

 

Oliver is going to be active and play all the STs units. He can also back-up Tate at the X. Oliver makes the 45 game active. 

 

Ayo is a project. He's not good enough to just be kept as a developmental project. That's what the PS is for. Are you going to keep Ayo on the 53 when he's not going to be active or contribute? No, not knowing everything we know now.

 

Saying Ayo is a lock is just a complete lack of understanding of roster construction


We e discussed all of this and it's all understood.  They like Ayo more and the last 3 WRs are all going to play ST. Clearly. And? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, titanruss said:


Haha, you're funny. I feel like I'm arguing with a sibling with the lack of paying attention to what has been said.  
 

He will be back regardless of every single WR. - That's what a lock is. 

 

he was a rookie... in an offense where the coach was fired after 5 games... and the new staff was unwanted after... and had a rookie QB... and no one across from him... we've covered this.
 

Yes, WR #5 needs to play ST. So? What's your argument? That he won't?!? Hahahahah.  Again, covered. Even with Restrepo last year this was playing ST when they needed him to. 
 

100% chance outside of a random off the field incident. Stop being silly. 

Again, your argument is relying on the idea that Ayomanor is a good WR. So far that has not been true, which is why he’s not a lock. Daboll is coming in with fresh eyes and may decide he doesn’t think he’s going to be worth keeping. 
 

He could show significant improvement in camp, in which case I’m sure they would keep him. But as that remains to be seen he is not a lock to make it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

Again, your argument is relying on the idea that Ayomanor is a good WR. So far that has not been true, which is why he’s not a lock. Daboll is coming in with fresh eyes and may decide he doesn’t think he’s going to be worth keeping. 
 

He could show significant improvement in camp, in which case I’m sure they would keep him. But as that remains to be seen he is not a lock to make it. 


My argument is relying on the investment, situation last year, current surroundings, the GMs statements, amount of WR we will keep, etc. 

 

Your argument relies on Bryce Oliver. You say that the back end of the WR group has to plays ST ( they all clearly will) ... well the back end also has to be able to play - get this - WR. Wild, I know, right? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...