Jump to content

QB Tiers - Mike Sando


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, ctm said:

The low volume passing attack starts with the organizational philosophy of the GM and HC, not the QB.

 

Yes, I'm sure it's the same for Cousins and Garoppolo. 

 

C'mon guys ... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Actually, they question is whether or not Tannehill plays well / better because of the philosophy and if it's necessary for him to succeed, as the Tier suggests.

 

But carry on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 7/25/2022 at 10:56 AM, Righteous said:

And guess what?  He is in the tier of the mental midgets (not even first, LOL).  Do don't let your fanboydom blind you.  LOL!

 

Tannehill isn't the reason we won't win a SB, it's the offensive philosophy we have.  Nobody thinks he's Hall of Fame bound because he's better than Locker, Young, or Mariota, but many know that he's good enough to win with. 

 

As far as the mental midget, I was referring to Willis. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jamalisms said:

Actually, they question is whether or not Tannehill plays well / better because of the philosophy and if it's necessary for him to succeed, as the Tier suggests.

 

But carry on.

 

Nah they're going to ignore what the OP says what every GM has said and what Tannehill has shown within this playstyle.

 

Instead, they're going to imagine there can be more if we just didn't pivot from the philosophy he's had his most success in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, StephenIsLegend said:

It’s 100% the organizational philosophy. 
 

C’mon, big. 

 

Well, we got the right QB I guess? According to the league.

 

You guys can't have it both ways. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, logicals said:

 

Allen’s career postseason stats…

 

65%, 16 TD’s, 1 INT

 

In Allen’s playoff losses, his defense has given up an average of 34 points!  Thirty-Four. 

 

Tannehill’s defense has given up an average of 24.5 points per game in his playoff losses and he has a 7 TD and 5 INT playoff stat line.

 

So yeah, not hypocritical all to say Allen comes up in the big moment and Tannehill doesn’t.

 

.

 

Come up big means winning.  Allen doesn't do that.  Instead, he has his fanboys find excuses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, rns90 said:

Oh boy, is he going about why we play because of Tannehill being limited argument again?

 

The league IS ... lol that's what this thread is about. Read the OP. LOL ... jesus. Don't agree if you want ... but my "crazy" idea apparently isn't that crazy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like this tier 3 thing is locked in stone. He was a higher tier last year. It's more that this ranking change, and many others, shows that Titans fans give Tannehill more leeway (excuses) than others ... including analysts, coaches, GMs, etc.

 

Nobody predicts the future perfectly and hopefully he plays like tier 1.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jamalisms said:

It's not like this tier 3 thing is locked in stone. He was a higher tier last year. It's more that this ranking change, and many others, shows that Titans fans give Tannehill more least that others ... including analysts, changes, GMs, etc.

 

Nobody predicts the future perfectly hopefully he plays like tier 1.

 

 

 

 

The Tannehill analysis from these yearly tiers has been consistently spot on. Even at his peak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

Tannehill has a body of work as the Titans QB that is excellent, it’s not a dream or wishful thinking 

 

The Titans improved the offense around him, they correctly knew that was the problem last season 

 

They also had no real way of replacing him for this year anyway, of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, IowaOiler said:

 

Tannehill isn't the reason we won't win a SB, it's the offensive philosophy we have.  Nobody thinks he's Hall of Fame bound because he's better than Locker, Young, or Mariota, but many know that he's good enough to win with. 

 

As far as the mental midget, I was referring to Willis. 

Of course I know you were referring to the Black QB on the roster.  You do what you do.  It's expected.  However, 33 -50,  for 385 yds and 2 TD's and 5 INT's over the last 2 home playoff games tell me that Tannehill is the very reason the Titans won't win a SB.  Or 785 yds and 7TD and 5 INTS over 5 playoff games.  What's that?  157 yds passing a game?  Dude's a joke...but we know you can't risk the thought of another non White QB starting in Tennessee! LOL  Hold on to the dream, Bro!!!!  LOL

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Titans279 said:

 

They also had no real way of replacing him for this year anyway, of course.

Whether it was Brady, Watson or Rodgers, the Titans organization has been doing everything it possibly can to replace him, however.  It's not because they ain't trying.  I feel bad for myself, first (as a fan) but also I feel bad for JRob, Vrabel and all the players wasting years playing with Tannehill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Righteous said:

Of course I know you were referring to the Black QB on the roster.  You do what you do.  It's expected.  However, 33 -50,  for 385 yds and 2 TD's and 5 INT's over the last 2 home playoff games tell me that Tannehill is the very reason the Titans won't win a SB.  Or 785 yds and 7TD and 5 INTS over 5 playoff games.  What's that?  157 yds passing a game?  Dude's a joke...but we know you can't risk the thought of another non White QB starting in Tennessee! LOL  Hold on to the dream, Bro!!!!  LOL

 

 

Dude, you can fuck right off with that bullshit.  Willis being a mental midget has nothing to do with his race, and the idea that you immediately made that inference says more about your views than anyone else's.  I suppose you think all the evaluators who questioned his ability to process quickly are just as racist?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...