Jump to content

Bills Week Discussion


AussieTitanFan08

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

 

Really makes you wonder if the Titans Organization puts this out through select reporters in favor of exclusivity on the  inside of some story down the road. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 865
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I was rewatching Bills-Chiefs game, and Allen is a scary good QB. They are totally unpredictable on offense, as they're good in running and passing the ball. But these days, a lot of stuff can be seen on social media, like - Mahomes is struggling, Allen is new MVP etc, and I strongly disagree about that. I couldn't believe how much time Allen has to throw a ball, WITHOUT PRESSURE. Bills OL are huge part of Allen's success. On the other hand, Mahomes has 2 seconds to throw or 1) he will be sacked, 2) he's on monster pressure and if he doesn't run, he'll be sacked. My point is, if we can bring pressure on Allen next Monday, and protect Tannehill slightly better (be average in pass pro) we have a good chance to win. Bills success on offense this season is build around great O-line, and our pass rush is a key for this game

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, croatian22 said:

I was rewatching Bills-Chiefs game, and Allen is a scary good QB. They are totally unpredictable on offense, as they're good in running and passing the ball. But these days, a lot of stuff can be seen on social media, like - Mahomes is struggling, Allen is new MVP etc, and I strongly disagree about that. I couldn't believe how much time Allen has to throw a ball, WITHOUT PRESSURE. Bills OL are huge part of Allen's success. On the other hand, Mahomes has 2 seconds to throw or 1) he will be sacked, 2) he's on monster pressure and if he doesn't run, he'll be sacked. My point is, if we can bring pressure on Allen next Monday, and protect Tannehill slightly better (be average in pass pro) we have a good chance to win. Bills success on offense this season is build around great O-line, and our pass rush is a key for this game

Don't get me wrong. The bills are the strong favorite and for good reason. But like you said we have alot in our favor. At home. Finally getting a little healthier. Coming into a huge game. Not like NY were it was easy to overlook. 

 

Should be exciting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Doogie said:

Don't get me wrong. The bills are the strong favorite and for good reason. But like you said we have alot in our favor. At home. Finally getting a little healthier. Coming into a huge game. Not like NY were it was easy to overlook. 

 

Should be exciting.

3.5 isn’t a strong fave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Doogie said:

I think if you took a national poll thr strong majority would take Bills. If I put money on it I would pick Buffalo.  

A 3.5 fave equates to something like a 55-60 percent fave I believe. I’ll check 538 and Numberfire with an update.

 

Edit - Markets are bullish on the titans in comparison to the statisticians. 538 has the spread as a 4.5 not a 3.5 and gives the Bills 65 percent.

 

Numberfire with a 70 percent for the bills but don’t provide a spread to non-paying people. So I’ll assume their spread is a 5.5-6.

 

Edit 2 - Books have adjusted to a 5.5 spread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, tgo said:

I think Robinson's biggest mistake as GM since he has been here other than paying Beasley was not paying Conklin. But I think the Browns actually had the edge and we'd have had to overpay due to his wife's desire to live in Cleveland. 

 

Um.  Isaiah Wilson was the biggest mistake, no question.  That pick even minimally pans out and none of us are here whining.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pat said:

 

Um.  Isaiah Wilson was the biggest mistake, no question.  That pick even minimally pans out and none of us are here whining.

 

I think you're right that it is above not extending Conklin as a "mistake" but to me the writing wasn't on the wall quite as much as with the Beasley signing - that had zero chance of working imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tgo said:

 

I think you're right that it is above not extending Conklin as a "mistake" but to me the writing wasn't on the wall quite as much as with the Beasley signing - that had zero chance of working imo.

 

Ugh good point.

 

Oof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said:

 

There were plenty of people here this offseason suggesting Reynolds would easily replace Corey Davis' production.

and they have been proven wrong so far by his performance! He may have great hands, but his routes are slow, and his blocking desire and ability is terrible! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Jonboy unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...