Jump to content

Larry Warford


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Highly unlikely with Nate Davis being the starter there and being about 7 million dollars cheaper. And they replaced him for a reason. 

Need.  We have a lot invested in the line.  Davis did well in the playoffs.  We just put another 1st rd pick on the line.  Where we need help the most now is slowing down offenses.  Money has to be sp

I think it depends on the player, the cap budget for that position group, and the market.    If you rewind through the Conklin situation, I think the moment they signed Saffold was a death n

4 minutes ago, Titansffaan said:

What’s the reason?

No idea - maybe because he's more of a power-man guard instead of a zone guy and they're running more zone these days? But maybe because he's getting older and not as good or injury reasons. 

 

Point being - they replaced him for a reason, and must be a good reason unless we think Loomis is a retard (he's not)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Titansffaan said:

28= not old...played at a high level...all about $ and since we’re probably not signing Clooney go ahead and spend some money. Definitely an upgrade over Davis!

Very likely not much of an upgrade on Davis. They drafted him to be the starter. 

 

Don't need to be wasting money on another guard right now when we're already paying one 14M per year and we have lucrative extensions right around the corner to get done. Also obviously trying to sign Clowney. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tgo said:

Very likely not much of an upgrade on Davis. They drafted him to be the starter. 

 

Don't need to be wasting money on another guard right now when we're already paying one 14M per year and we have lucrative extensions right around the corner to get done. Also obviously trying to sign Clowney. 

There's no point into signing Warford.  Davis knows the scheme and looks to be improving.  They also determined that they were spending too much money on the OL (Conklin's departure).  They aren't going to suddenly turn around and offer decent money for Warford.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Number9 said:

Need.  We have a lot invested in the line.  Davis did well in the playoffs.  We just put another 1st rd pick on the line.  Where we need help the most now is slowing down offenses.  Money has to be spent correctly or it's wasted.

Amazing how so many here don't seem to understand that when you're paying your QB 25-30 million dollars a year, you have to set limits on other position groups to remain competitive and we're paying Lewan, Safford and Jones health veteran contracts already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...