wiscotitansfan

Legit question - is there any other team where the ex players talk shit so consistently against? Was it coaching? Is it the front office? Is it ownership and whatever spending they may or may not do? it’s wild how so consistently a player is willing to trash the franchise. I don’t follow anyone close but Titans and Packers in the NFL so don’t know if these pot shots are a bit more regular than I expected or the obvious answer that the Titans clearly have some massive issues.

Idk. I never listen to it, I can’t stand listening to that cringey crap

You're right. It probably has changed depending on what interview he's in and when asked (aka theres no fucking way in the heat of the moment he goes for 2) On Bussin with the Boys he shook his head on going for two and Lewan agreeingly brings up up how you need to take the points in the superbowl.

Yeah because he never had to actually make that decision

I don't give a fuck about the hostility on this site tbh (i contribute to it a lot), it's the need to just bring in Tannehill completely outta the blue because you have some bone to pick with a few vocal minorities that's the obnoxious part

So your answer to that is by also creating extra hostility and preemptively bringing Tannehill into the conversation any time someone who is excited as fuck for Levis, but just not quite as excited as you are?

I'm going to compare it to current day right wing politics - Some people are so fucking entrenched in their battles that any sense of criticism (or seemingly just being in the middle) is seen as an attack on them and it must be because they are also so dug in on their own stances against yours I couldn't care less about Tannehill, especially going forward and yet me acknowledging that concerns of Levis at this point are warranted is somehow because of Tannehill. It just makes no sense why that's relevant.

What are you going on about? All I said was that I don't think Levis is underrated to Titans fans because we've seen people fawn over him an obscene amount just after 2 games with plenty of Titans fans still being a little over the top homers despite concerning flaws. The reality (which I did say too) is that he has a lot of promise that we all should be excited about and people's opinions vary greatly on how much those accuracy and decision making concerns actually matter at this point

You even follow up and say that no context is actually needed but the wording is drastically different than what you are implying. and LOL at pinning it on posters obsessed with Tannehill being the reason that context isn't necessary

Your exact wording was "Levis is the truth. Dude played great given poor circumstances." after the Steelers game. I get stats don't matter and it was only his 2nd start, but "Levis is the Truth" after 2 starts from anyone is homer nonsense and you know it. No matter the context. If comments like "Levis is the Truth" mean we have something to be cautiously very optimistic for then sure, but typically that phrase would be much closer to dude is going to be great.

To Titans homers? absolutely not, there are idiots claiming he was already a franchise QB after 1 or 2 starts. To the general public, I think people still tend to overrate him a little because of some highlight throws but I'd say he's generally rated right where he should be. A guy with huge potential if he can fix his accuracy issues and decision making but his arm has some tools that can't be taught. I'd say that's right where people put him with everyone varying greatly on how much of a fatal flaw his issues are since historically it's pretty damn tough to fix accuracy and decision making

To be concise, my draft order proposal is… 1 - 25% lottery chance 2 - 25% lottery chance 3 - 25% lottery chance 4 - 25% lottery chance 5 - most points scored for 5/6 seed 6 - least points scored for 5/6 seed 7 - lower seed to lose 1st round 8 - higher seed to lose 1st round 9 - lower seed in 3rd place game 10 - higher seed in 3rd place game 11 - championship game loser 12 - League champion

So you’re upset that I’m actually proposing changes compared to just hot air being blown… it’s hilarious how you think someone proposing specifics is some nonsensical concept

There really are only 2 positions to choose at #7 - That different option could be trading out (unlikely IMO with how quickly the top end talent drops) if that's what you are getting at but I don't see how anything has changed with who we will pick

What are you talking about? Your whole schtick the past couple weeks seems to be to troll whoever was talking shit about Henry's contract or potential contracts before he signed. Isn't the defintion of trolling trying to get under someone's skin?

Is this a source that people (besides Bongo) have been parroting?

I talked shit last week to whoever was saying dumb shit about Ridley's contract too, calling people out for outlandish shit like saying that there are only 2 GOATs and no other sports have a greatest isn't getting under anyone's skin. But noted, you always need to chime in to get the last word and the only way that you're not "under someone's skin" is if they just bow out of the conversation

What are you talking about? I've literally engaged with you 2x in the past month or two?

You think you keep getting under everyone’s skin and people are all emotional about engaging with you for some reason when anyone disagrees with you. Explain to me how Tiger should never be in the conversation of GOAT of his sport where the other 2 are the only people that discussion is reasonable?

It's as engaging and as compelling of a conversation as your comment on "Yep. The only 2 sports where you can say someone is the GOAT is hockey and basketball." It's wild how someone was old enough to see how Tiger changed the sport and was more dominant than any of his peers by so much than likely any athlete in possibly the history of televised sports besides Gretzky and still try to pretend there's only a conversation to be had about only 2 people ever.

This is so incorrect

We also need to change it so playoffs matters, as of now (and for forever) the only thing that decides playoff team picking order is regular season record. I propose picks 7 - 12 are.... 12 - Champion 11 - Championship Loser 10 - Higher seed of 3rd Place Game 9 - Lower seed of 3rd Place Game 8 - Higher seed of team to lose 1st Round 7 - Lowest seed of team to lose 1st Round

I think this should be mandatory, it is not difficult or constraining to make sure that you have about $20 as some emergency fund to make pickups. Or if people are too stupid to budget, we could only waivers and players are only able to be picked up in those designated waiver periods (tuesday night and saturday night) and no player ever hits free agency. I think this is a much worse option because sometimes players get injured/designated out last second

My vote is to have a 25/25/25/25 odds lottery of let's say picks 1-4 and then 5-6 is decided by total points in the season (potentially something as wild as inverse points, where the highest scoring team would pick 5 to be rewarded for playing better lineups each week) I think 1-4 needs to have a lottery where I don't know if even 1-3 would stop tanking because there have always been at least 2 people the past few years who say they will attempt to be competent managers but then just say fuck it and throw the season away.

It’s wild how caught up people get with a QB having any value because he has some tape on him playing well. These guys are in the NFL for a reason.