Poll - Should the Titans draft Jeremiah Love at #4?

[abenjami]

Simple yes or no question.  If Jeremiah Love is available at #4, should the Titans draft him or someone else?

[Somedude]

Fuck it. Why not

[IsntLifeFunny]

If Bailey or Reese aren't there then the answer is yes. 

[Starkiller]

I’d prefer a good trade down but I’d be fine with Love at 4

[abenjami]

5 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

If Bailey or Reese aren't there then the answer is yes. 

 

2 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

I’d prefer a good trade down but I’d be fine with Love at 4

 

Sorry but these conditions or limitations are not acceptable for this thread.  It is a simple yes or no question that does not depend on who else is on the board or what you might prefer.

[Starkiller]

2 minutes ago, abenjami said:

 

 

Sorry but these conditions or limitations are not acceptable for this thread.  It is a simple yes or no question that does not depend on who else is on the board or what you might prefer.

Then definitely maybe

[abenjami]

3 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

Then definitely maybe

 

If you prefer a trade down then your vote should be no, not yes.

 

Logic, learn it.

[Starkiller]

2 minutes ago, abenjami said:

 

If you prefer a trade down then your vote should be no, not yes.

 

Logic, learn it.

But I don’t think we will get a good trade down, so I picked Love.

[TerryBoats]

Bailey is the only player who should be considered over him.  This class sucks.

[TerryBoats]

Mike Renner recently said that he sees Love as an even better prospect than Robinson and the others who have recently been highly drafted, given how well he fits into the modern game.  Which I'm assuming refers to his long speed and receiving ability.  In the right situation, he'll be far more impactful than Reese, Styles, etc.

[OILERMAN]

1 minute ago, TerryBoats said:

 In the right situation, he'll be far more impactful than Reese, Styles, etc.

 

He may be a better player as a RB than one of the edge rushers, but that skillset doesn't equate to winning or contending like an edge rusher would. 

[TerryBoats]

18 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

He may be a better player as a RB than one of the edge rushers, but that skillset doesn't equate to winning or contending like an edge rusher would. 

The issue is that the options are a 240 lbs off ball LB who wasn't great at edge in college or a short, slow DE with historically short arms.  Neither of which can be confidently projected to even be a solid full-time player on the edge. 

Edited 3 hours ago by TerryBoats

[OILERMAN]

Just now, TerryBoats said:

The issue is that the options are a 240 lbs off ball LB or a short, slow DE with historically short arms.  Neither of which can be confidently projected to even be a solid full-time player on the edge. 

 

They won't pass on Reese or Bailey but I doubt either of them are there

[TerryBoats]

5 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

They won't pass on Reese or Bailey but I doubt either of them are there

They took a project edge in the 2nd round last year.  They can't take another is at #4 in Reese.  They need someone who can definitely contribute right away.

[CreepingDeath]

I'll get back to you Thursday night.