Titandan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 4 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Kirk was the one inciting violence. As is Trump (he’s the one literally referring to people as “vermin”). ICE agents are a paramilitary force rounding up minorities and violently assaulting non-violent protesters. Minorities you say??? I'm trembling in my kimono, bro... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 3 minutes ago, pat said: Given that the driver was shot and killed, how did the uncontrolled car not hit the ICE agent who supposedly was in its path and instead rolled across the street and hit a tree? No shit dum dums the idiot agent was never in danger. For our purposes, we should actually more acurrately call him a racist sniper. The cowardly ICE Gestapo just assassinated her from behind the bushes about 100 feet away. She was just in her car minding her own business and listening to "We are the World" when the racist bullet came from no where and sniped her which caused for her leg muscles to tense up and floor the accelerator into another car. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 3 hours ago, LongTimeFan said: You jumped to assume I thought that was the catalyst. It was an event, that if not performed, would have prevented her death. As is not blocking traffic. As is not being an anti ICE agitator. None of that matters. The ICE officer still used excessive force. He was not justified in what he did. OILERMAN, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 3 minutes ago, Titandan said: The cowardly ICE Gestapo just assassinated her from behind the bushes about 100 feet away. Actually the ICE Gestapo agent shot her in the head 3 times from point blank range… reo, and IsntLifeFunny 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 4 hours ago, OILERMAN said: If they really thought the ICE agent was in the right they wouldn't have to totally fabricate, gaslight and lie about what really happened You like this ugly ass chink? Even us fellow chinks don't claim his unfunny ass. We'll officially donate him and equally "talented" shangchi guy to white libs who can easily be guilted into cheap pity laughs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Actually the ICE Gestapo agent shot her in the head 3 times from point blank range… No he was a safe distance away from moving vehicle. He executed her in cold blood. Edited January 11 by Titandan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Just now, Titandan said: No he was a safe distance away from moving vehicle. Yes, standing beside the drivers side door close enough to shoot the driver through the window is a safe distance… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 4 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Yes, standing beside the drivers side door close enough to shoot the driver through the window is a safe distance… Ok let's go with that. He was in his shock-absorbent bubble suit standing next to the car when he executed her in cold blood. And even if she didn't get shot, she would have died from poisoning anyway due to his toxic masculinity and racism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctm Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 From what I can see, the shooting agent is originally standing about in line with the drivers headlight of the car. Can't determine the original exact distance from shooter to car. Then the car starts to drive away veering away from him to the right. News reports also indicate that two of the shooter's shots were fired at the car as it has already departed. One other factor I can't determine. Did the shooter already have his gun drawn before the car started to move? It so, that speaks to his original intent....not to protect himself from an oncoming vehicle. Titandan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titandan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 5 minutes ago, ctm said: From what I can see, the shooting agent is originally standing about in line with the drivers headlight of the car. Can't determine the original exact distance from shooter to car. Then the car starts to drive away veering away from him to the right. News reports also indicate that two of the shooter's shots were fired at the car as it has already departed. One other factor I can't determine. Did the shooter already have his gun drawn before the car started to move? It so, that speaks to his original intent....not to protect himself from an oncoming vehicle. Finally, some one with an ounce of objectivity. Forgot to drink your morning kool-aid, bro? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post MadMax Posted January 11 Popular Post Report Share Posted January 11 Starkiller, reo, pat, and 2 others 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 (edited) 2 minutes ago, MadMax said: Edited January 11 by reo Starkiller, and MadMax 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeFan Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 33 minutes ago, reo said: None of that matters. The ICE officer still used excessive force. He was not justified in what he did. That's your opinion. I would bet the law differs with you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 1 minute ago, LongTimeFan said: That's your opinion. I would bet the law differs with you. “Deadly force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.” — Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) “An officer may use deadly force only when the officer reasonably believes that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or another person.” — U.S. Department of Justice, Use of Force Policy That is the law. Not whether the person disobeyed, fled, or what the officer later claimed he believed — but whether an imminent, unavoidable lethal threat actually existed at the moment force was used. Starkiller, IsntLifeFunny, and MadMax 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadMax Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 1 minute ago, reo said: “Deadly force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.” — Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985) “An officer may use deadly force only when the officer reasonably believes that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or another person.” — U.S. Department of Justice, Use of Force Policy That is the law. Not whether the person disobeyed, fled, or what the officer later claimed he believed — but whether an imminent, unavoidable lethal threat actually existed at the moment force was used. Well whaddya know. This should end the argument. We know it won't. More bullshit incoming. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.