Jamalisms Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 5 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: The Titans(in the contender years) were not an efficient 1st down running team because of this. They were one of, if not, the best passing teams on 1st down. It's almost like that's connected. titanruss 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somedude Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 19 minutes ago, Number9 said: NO. Titans history. I liked Jeff. I thought he should have received COY in 2000. It's just a fact f-a-c-t. Mike Vrabel is concerned by the NFL community as a very good coach. When you debate known truths it's hard to take you serious. When MV was coaching-we kicked ass. Titans had a tude'. Still Jeff Fisher. 110 wins as just the Titans coach, ignoring the Oilers years. Meathead. 54 wins. Math is hard. You sound like an 11-year-old when you type. Or retarded. Edited 11 hours ago by Somedude Number9 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 32 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: BTW, @Jamalisms That video perfectly illustrates the problem with Vrabel with the Titans.... As the chart showed, the more you run into a run defense the less effective the run is. The Titans(in the contender years) were not an efficient 1st down running team because of this. They were one of, if not, the best passing teams on 1st down. They didn't have to throw the ball every 1st down, they just should have been way more balanced(throw more actually), they ran the ball the most on 1st down. and they were able to run the ball inside the 10 with both Tannehill and Henry. lol the bean counter still not understanding the Titans chose to run into stacked fronts by way of personnel groupings/formations, and tendencies on 1st down. Teams didn't stack the box to stop Henry. offenses can get whatever front they want to face anytime. Edited 11 hours ago by oldschool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Somedude said: Still Jeff Fisher. 110 wins as just the Titans coach, ignoring the Oilers years. Meathead. 54 wins. Math is hard. You sound like an 11-year-old when you type. Or retarded. If I didn't say it, I meant winning percentage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 51 minutes ago, Number9 said: NO. Titans history. I liked Jeff. I thought he should have received COY in 2000. It's just a fact f-a-c-t. Mike Vrabel is concerned by the NFL community as a very good coach. When you debate known truths it's hard to take you serious. When MV was coaching-we kicked ass. Titans had a tude'. Vrable had 55 wins, jeff had 110 from 1999 onward. So its not even a competition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago Vrabel is a top coach and understands his talent. He's not looking at some stat from a message board to decide how to coach his football team. He knew couldn't win running the offense through Tannehill. Tannehill proved him right every time teams shut down the run game in the playoffs. We sacked Joe B 9 times and Tannehill couldn't bring home a win. When the Chiefs stopped Henry in 19' I started to wake up. Tannehill feasted off stacked boxes. When he was asked to win a playoff game with his arm it was over. You guys had him racked higher than Lamar(MVP) and a lot of quality QBs. Just quit with the crappy football understanding. Tannehill-I loved the guy. But I'm not putting him on some kind of pedestal he doesn't deserve. I'm done. You get one quality football analyst to say Vrabel sucks, then I will respond. One. Just 1. Other than that just talk to the hand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 39 minutes ago, oldschool said: lol the bean counter still not understanding the Titans chose to run into stacked fronts by way of personnel groupings/formations, and tendencies on 1st down. Teams didn't stack the box to stop Henry. offenses can get whatever front they want to face anytime. You love telling yourself stories. It's an interesting personality trait and says a lot. Number9 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago When number9 comes to your def you know you have nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanruss Posted 9 hours ago Report Share Posted 9 hours ago How did we pass on first down in passing sets that weren't play action during non pass heavy situations? Thats the stat you chase. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somedude Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, Number9 said: If I didn't say it, I meant winning percentage. Oh gee what a difference you fucking dipshit! 54.2 vs 54.5...OOOOOOOH! So amazing! Keep moving goalposts. Callidus, and Number9 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, Somedude said: Oh gee what a difference you fucking dipshit! 54.2 vs 54.5...OOOOOOOH! So amazing! Keep moving goalposts. Same record within margin of error on twice the sample size should get the nod imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, titanruss said: How did we pass on first down in passing sets that weren't play action during non pass heavy situations? Thats the stat you chase. Tannehill's passer rating was about the same either way in 2019 and 2020 Bad news I know Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 55 minutes ago, OILERMAN said: Tannehill's passer rating was about the same either way in 2019 and 2020 Bad news I know You are arguing with the dumbest motherfuckers... OILERMAN 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 10 hours ago, Jamalisms said: It's almost like that's connected. Yes, as the video you posted explained, running into a run defense is less effective. Passing vs run defense effective. Vrabel(and obviously you) couldn't grasp this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.