reo Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 1 hour ago, rns90 said: He’s not here for discussion. Just to peddle whatever he believes in. See he’s not a total asshole/racist that probably saves him from being banned. Once you realize that the stupid questions are just a tactic to obfuscate whenever Trump has done something or just as a way to loop back to more propaganda spreading . You can pretty much ignore him. yes but letting the bullshit he spreads go unchallenged is a bigger issue. That's why i shut a lot of it down until he changes the subject. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Titandan said: What did you shut down? You didn't answer my question? Is it the same girl who bit his #@#$? That story has serious abnormalities which I've listed before but you totally ignored it. You didn't quote me on it, dumbass. You quoted someone else and asked them. What "abnormalities?" Edited February 24 by reo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rns90 Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 1 hour ago, reo said: yes but letting the bullshit he spreads go unchallenged is a bigger issue. That's why i shut a lot of it down until he changes the subject. I’m almost tempted to post some non sensical and really ot response to some of his BS, but I don’t want to clutter up the board . I mean it’s pretty much the same as some of his “posts” anyway. reo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 2 hours ago, IsntLifeFunny said: What the fuck is wrong with you, you childish motherfucker? Using juvenile language when discussing child rape is fucked in the head. You're an unserious posted and honestly you should be banned from starting topics. LOL you big baby. And I suppose you believe that libtard reporter that wrote the girl was credible. Kind of like how believable Christine Ford was right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 26 minutes ago, Little Earl said: LOL you big baby. And I suppose you believe that libtard reporter that wrote the girl was credible. Kind of like how believable Christine Ford was right? No, you're supposed to trust the FBI who interviewed her multiple times, labeled her a victim and marked it as "protect source". They obviously thought she was credible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamalisms Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 An uncooperative victim in fear of reprisal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 52 minutes ago, Titandan said: So who shut down the investigation? How would I know? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 4 hours ago, rns90 said: Thinking about this in retrospect, it’s really retarded to campaign on an issue that you are prominently the main subject in (in the most horrible and appalling way). It's actually effective. Roy Cohn taught Trump these strategies Yes, the tactic of "accuse them of what you are guilty of" is widely identified as a core tenet of the, legal, and public relations strategy utilized by Roy Cohn, particularly when mentoring Donald Trump. Roy Cohn’s, a lawyer and mentor to Donald Trump, core strategy for handling crisis was: "admit nothing, deny everything, and always claim victory". His playbook emphasized attacking critics immediately, never apologizing, and using "deny, deflect, delay" tactics to turn accusations into power struggles Some others The Six Dark Lessons Roy Cohn Taught Trump (That He Still Uses Today) https://ideas.bkconnection.com/the-five-lessons-roy-cohn-taught-donald-trump-that-guide-him-to-this-day IsntLifeFunny, MadMax, rns90, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 1 minute ago, Titandan said: A lot of inconsistencies I think. What inconsistencies? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 8 hours ago, Mythos27 said: What we have wouldn't secure a conviction in court. That's the standard you need to actually prosecute a sitting president IMO. I'm not trying to convict him in court. Just explain to me why he moved Maxwell to a minimum security prison where she gets pampered, tried to force the Republican congresswoman to vote against the release of the files, got the FBI to redact his name out and said they were a democratic hoax. Seriously, explain why if he's not guilty MadMax, Omar, reo, and 1 other 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 6 minutes ago, Titandan said: Bussing people around with private money is one thing. But this one hits close to home for me. CHIRLA is a Los Angeles NGO and it's using government (tax payer money) for political protests. I bet you this is just a drop in the bucket. I know... trusting my gut is not scientific. You fucking pea brain... That's the most ridiculous shit ever https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-california-did-not-064130510.html Did California pay the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) more than $100 million mainly to fund protests as a viral social media post said? No, that's not true: California's payments to CHIRLA were overwhelmingly tied to immigration legal services and social welfare programs. There is no evidence in state budget records that any funds were used to pay or organize protesters. You are a fucking moron IsntLifeFunny, and reo 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 24 Report Share Posted February 24 Alex Jones.....lol I heard the lawyer say he was going to kill him, he clearly didn't mean it literally Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 25 Report Share Posted February 25 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted February 25 Report Share Posted February 25 31 minutes ago, Titandan said: We literally have legal advocacy for tenants (good and bad) paid for by landlords. Yes. Landlords are literally paying an annual fee for tenants to get free legal counsel so they can legally screw the landlords. WTF does that have to do with CA paying protestors 100 mill? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted February 25 Report Share Posted February 25 4 minutes ago, Titandan said: I don't believe in guilt by association but good freaking grief! How many people around that circle is involved? lol around what circle? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.