If Brock Bowers Blows Up the Combine...

[IsntLifeFunny]

16 minutes ago, Justafan said:

You guys are foaming at the mouth to draft a TE that averaged 7-800 yards and 7-8 TDs in an offense that routinely scored 30-50 points and is too small to play inline. 

 

Whatever. To each his own I guess. 

It isn't about the prospect for Reo and Prag. That's just them debating the philosophy. I agree though lol. When you get the brothers going watch out! 

[reo]

4 minutes ago, Justafan said:

I didn't refer to you in any way. My comments were directed specifically at the sentiment of advocating for Bowers over guys like Nabers or Odunze. As usual, you never really understand what is being said. It is a weird but consistent trend. 

 

I don't see anyone foaming at the mouth for Bowers. Getting emotional again?

[headhunter]

Just now, reo said:

 

I don't see anyone foaming at the mouth for Bowers. Getting emotional again?

Prag

[reo]

4 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

He's at the gym or are on the way there. 

 

2-3 hrs as per usual

 

it's almost like it's the same time every day for the past 10ish years.

[ctm]

5 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

He's at the gym or are on the way there. He doesn't care lol

Go deep in the archives and we've had this debate about a TE early before.

[reo]

1 minute ago, headhunter said:

Prag

 

Not at all. It's almost like you don't get what we're talking about. Now go back to your corner. The adults are still talking.

[Justafan]

Just now, reo said:

 

I don't see anyone foaming at the mouth for Bowers. Getting emotional again?

This is a direct reflection of someone who gets offended when they lose their seat at the table of a mature conversation. Since this is who you are and this is the only way you know how to interact, do everyone on the board a favor and go away. 

[reo]

Just now, ctm said:

Go deep in the archives and we've had this debate about a TE early before.

 

I don't remember having this debate about one this early but it's very possible. we talk a lot

[reo]

Just now, Justafan said:

This is a direct reflection of someone who gets offended when they lose their seat at the table of a mature conversation. Since this is who you are and this is the only way you know how to interact, do everyone on the board a favor and go away. 

 

oh? react how?

[oldschool]

1 minute ago, ctm said:

Go deep in the archives and we've had this debate about a TE early before.

 

I'm getting old and don't recall this convo. Who was it about?

 

[headhunter]

4 minutes ago, reo said:

 

Not at all. It's almost like you don't get what we're talking about. Now go back to your corner. The adults are still talking.

You need a seat at the childs table, you're too small to take seriously 

[ctm]

1 minute ago, oldschool said:

 

I'm getting old and don't recall this convo. Who was it about?

 

 Me too. 

 

Can't remember the player, but remember the extended, extended debate about a TE early.

[IsntLifeFunny]

@reo

 

Just read the evaluation and it fits with what I've seen as well. The part that stood out to me though is him being projected as an F/Move TE. I just can't justify a top 7 pick for a guy you'll consistently have to take off the field because he can't hold up as a blocker. 

 

Like you noted, if he's able to stack weight and maintain his athleticism then that could be a different projection, but still a projection. 230 is 20-30 pounds smaller than Kelce and Gronk. 

 

I will say he has similar speed to Gronk, maybe faster, and has just as good of hands as Kelce. Dude has stickum on those gloves.

 

If we draft him I want it to be a in a trade down to the 15 range giving us the ability to move back into round 1 for an LT. We have to get an LT in this draft.

[Justafan]

Just now, ctm said:

 Me too. 

 

Can't remember the player, but remember the extended, extended debate about a TE early.

I think it was over Howard a few years back. 

[Justafan]

5 minutes ago, reo said:

 

oh? react how?

Still confused? What a shocker.