Jump to content

Tracking Offensive Fallout - Week 16


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

Just now, OILERMAN said:

 

Do you disagree the biggest problems with the offense are the known passing situations? Did you not see the huge dropoff in Tannehill on 3rd down, where Henry isn't a factor, even according to Jamal? The topic hasn't been changed

Henry would help that a great deal because the "stats" show the offense was better w/Henry than wo/Henry.  The team has had injury issues all season.  ALSO, the defense is the real hero of this team.  They shut down the 9ers at 10pts and gave the offense 2+quarters to get back in the game.

 

AJB has 760yds this season, he can't keep the Titans on the field resting the defense like Henry.  I was talking about TOP a few weeks ago.  Some idiot(OS) instantly starts yelling TOP doesn't mean anything.  TOP is how running teams/Titans beat passing team, they keep them on the bench.  Then our asskicking D three and outs them.

 

AJB.  I love the guy, but one WR is not enough.  The rest of them aren't a threat now and haven't been a threat all season.  A drop on 3rd down is all on the QB.  But I knew when Henry went down, we didn't have the weapons to run the offense through Tannehill.  Poor pass blocking, one elite WR, plus a collection of injured players/stifs for Tannehill to throw the ball.  Exactly what he has had all season.  Henry was covering up this weakness in the offense.

 

Tannehill is a Titan in my book.  Every player does not receive that honor from me.  I also know he's not known for picking teams apart with his arm.  He's not a creative QB.  People claiming we won't miss Henry placed too much responsibility on him.  Henry was his biggest weapon.

 

"we will just open up the passing game, we might be even better". Whenever I post in this thread, that's all I am talking about.  w/Henry vs wo/Henry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, Number9 said:

Henry would help that a great deal because the "stats" show the offense was better w/Henry than wo/Henry.  The team has had injury issues all season.  ALSO, the defense is the real hero of this team.  They shut down the 9ers at 10pts and gave the offense 2+quarters to get back in the game.

 

AJB has 760yds this season, he can't keep the Titans on the field resting the defense like Henry.  I was talking about TOP a few weeks ago.  Some idiot(OS) instantly starts yelling TOP doesn't mean anything.  TOP is how running teams/Titans beat passing team, they keep them on the bench.  Then our asskicking D three and outs them.

 

AJB.  I love the guy, but one WR is not enough.  The rest of them aren't a threat now and haven't been a threat all season.  A drop on 3rd down is all on the QB.  But I knew when Henry went down, we didn't have the weapons to run the offense through Tannehill.  Poor pass blocking, one elite WR, plus a collection of injured players/stifs for Tannehill to throw the ball.  Exactly what he has had all season.  Henry was covering up this weakness in the offense.

 

Tannehill is a Titan in my book.  Every player does not receive that honor from me.  I also know he's not known for picking teams apart with his arm.  He's not a creative QB.  People claiming we won't miss Henry placed too much responsibility on him.  Henry was his biggest weapon.

 

"we will just open up the passing game, we might be even better". Whenever I post in this thread, that's all I am talking about.  w/Henry vs wo/Henry.

 

You answered nothing and pretty much said nothing 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OILERMAN said:

 

As has been explained at nauseum.... The offense has major protection issues and the skill people have been ravaged by injury. 3rd down is largely a known passing down and these issues are multiplied then. Not a thing to do with Derrick Henry in this case. 

I really have no idea why he asked that question.  Bum WR's + shitty pass blocking OL + obvious passing down where pass rushers can pin their ears back.  Of course Tannehill is going to struggle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OILERMAN said:

 

You answered nothing and pretty much said nothing 

 

2 minutes ago, rns90 said:

I really have no idea why he asked that question.  Bum WR's + shitty pass blocking OL + obvious passing down where pass rushers can pin their ears back.  Of course Tannehill is going to struggle.

@rns90 thanks for saying exactly what I said, maybe they will hear it from you.

 

13 minutes ago, Number9 said:

AJB.  I love the guy, but one WR is not enough.  The rest of them aren't a threat now and haven't been a threat all season.  A drop on 3rd down is all on the QB.  But I knew when Henry went down, we didn't have the weapons to run the offense through Tannehill.  Poor pass blocking, one elite WR, plus a collection of injured players/stifs for Tannehill to throw the ball.  Exactly what he has had all season.  Henry was covering up this weakness in the offense.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

Nine’s numbers from the other day made sense. With Henry and AJB on the field we will usually average around 27-30 a game. With only one we drop a TD. Without both we are down to scraping for a 17 point game. 

Yeah at this point, some of these people can't figure out the reasons why our offense sucks at times.  I just shrug my shoulders at this point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, oldschool said:

I can misuse stats too!

 

With Brown, 9-2 26ppg

Without Brown, 1-3 17ppg

 

I don't think this is misusing them, Brown is 100% more important to the offense than Henry is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...