Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, luvyablue256 said:

 

They didn't filibuster a bunch of bills. They simply didn't bring them to the floor because McConnell controlled the calendar. Schumer now controls what hits the floor. 

 

You want to take bets on whether McConnell filibusters voting rights, climate change, workers rights, ACA expansion, and Immigration? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No I don't think that has anything to do with super rich. It is the top 1.8% of income earners though.    Also if you think the proposals to raise the taxes on people making that much are ex

A couple of years ago, I was  late for a conference call with colleagues in Germany and India. After joining the call and apologizing for being late. Someone from India said, "just be like Trump and s

Voter ID isn't the big issue. The big issue is state law proposals that allow state legislatures to overrule the vote in elections and that take power away from the state's secretaries of state as wel

Posted Images

6 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

You want to take bets on whether McConnell filibusters voting rights, climate change, workers rights, ACA expansion, and Immigration? 

 

Not if there's limitations put on it. The 2 dems verbally stated they weren't in favor of filibuster elimination. They didn't say they were against filibuster reform...

 

Chuck Schumer is from fucking Brooklyn. When he said "we're not going to let McConnell run the Senate" he meant it. Why else would McConnell attempt to even fight to preserve it if he knew it wouldn't get tampered?

Edited by luvyablue256
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, luvyablue256 said:

 

Not if there's limitations put on it. The 2 dems verbally stated they weren't in favor of filibuster elimination. They didn't say they were against filibuster reform...

 

Chuck Schumer is from fucking Brooklyn. When he said "we're not going to let McConnell run the Senate" he meant it. Why else would McConnell attempt to even fight to preserve it if he knew it wouldn't get tampered?

 

You are all over the place. No one is saying Schumer should have removed the filibuster in response to McConnell's refusal to organize the Senate. All we are saying is that it shouldn't be taken off the table. We'll see what happens after McConnell filibusters bill after bill of Biden's agenda. Thats whant the real discussion on the filibuster will start. In addition, the idea of modifying the Filibuster instead of removing it may be a way out, only time will tell. 

 

As for Schumer, he is out of his depth and has been since he was elected Min leader. McConnell runs circles around him and he will continue to pressure Schumer as Min leader. Thats what the organization fight was all about. Letting Schumer know its going to be all out war on a daily basis. McConnell's goal is to retake his position as Maj leader in 2022 and make Biden a one term president. He cares about nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

You are all over the place. No one is saying Schumer should have removed the filibuster in response to McConnell's refusal to organize the Senate. All we are saying is that it shouldn't be taken off the table. We'll see what happens after McConnell filibusters bill after bill of Biden's agenda. Thats whant the real discussion on the filibuster will start. In addition, the idea of modifying the Filibuster instead of removing it may be a way out, only time will tell. 

 

As for Schumer, he is out of his depth and has been since he was elected Min leader. McConnell runs circles around him and he will continue to pressure Schumer as Min leader. Thats what the organization fight was all about. Letting Schumer know its going to be all out war on a daily basis. McConnell's goal is to retake his position as Maj leader in 2022 and make Biden a one term president. He cares about nothing else.

 

Give me some examples of McConnell "running circles" around Schumer that had nothing to do with the powers of being the majority leader, and the limitations on being the minority leader...

 

You are aware of the limitations of only being the minority leader, right? 

 

McConnell literally caved last night. How is this not a win?

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, luvyablue256 said:

 

Not if there's limitations put on it. The 2 dems verbally stated they weren't in favor of filibuster elimination. They didn't say they were against filibuster reform...

 

Chuck Schumer is from fucking Brooklyn. When he said "we're not going to let McConnell run the Senate" he meant it. Why else would McConnell attempt to even fight to preserve it if he knew it wouldn't get tampered?

Schumer is a pussy and a terrible leader. Dems need new leadership in both the house and senate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

Schumer is a pussy and a terrible leader. Dems need new leadership in both the house and senate. 

 

Again... provide examples of WHY you think he's a terrible leader. Everyone pisses on Pelosi and Schumer but never states examples why. It reeks of pure bias and no logic.

Edited by luvyablue256
Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, luvyablue256 said:

 

Again... provide examples of WHY you think he's a terrible leader. Everyone pisses on Pelosi and Schumer but never states examples why. It reeks of pure bias and no logic.

 

You want evidence? Do you think any Republican Senator would go directly to Schumer in a fight like this?

 

 

Edited by oldschool
Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ChesterCopperpot1 said:

Schumer is a pussy and a terrible leader. Dems need new leadership in both the house and senate. 

At some point democrats need new leadership, but not now.  Schumer has no margin for error.  He can't lose a single democratic vote and pass a bill on his own.  Pelosi is in a similar but not identical situation.  She doesn't have many democratic votes she can lose.

 

Now is not the time for on the job training in these two spots, imo.  Too much on the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

You want evidence? Do you think any Republican Senator would go directly to Schumer in a fight like this?

 

 

 

See, you don't even realize what happened yesterday. Sinema and Manchin signalled to McConnell that they wouldn't vote for eliminating the filibuster so that McConnell would cave in. And he caved WITHOUT any promises put in writing! Schumer now has free reign over the committees, the calendar, AND modifying and weakening the filibuster. 

 

You have to watch the whole game and not just the ballcarrier...

Edited by luvyablue256
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

You want evidence? Do you think any Republican Senator would go directly to Schumer in a fight like this?

 

 

 

.....get rid of

 

Let's see what Sinema does, rather than says, when McConnell attempts to filibuster DACA.

Edited by ctm
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ctm said:

At some point democrats need new leadership, but not now.  Schumer has no margin for error.  He can't lose a single democratic vote and pass a bill on his own.  Pelosi is in a similar but not identical situation.  She doesn't have many democratic votes she can lose.

 

Now is not the time for on the job training in these two spots, imo.  Too much on the line.

 

I dont like Schumer but I agree with this stance. 2022 should bring major changes in the House as Pelosi will be 82. I expect Schumer to stay in power until the Dems lose the senate again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, luvyablue256 said:

 

See, you don't even realize what happened yesterday. Sinema and Manchin signalled to McConnell that they wouldn't vote for eliminating the filibuster so that McConnell would cave in. And he caved WITHOUT any promises put in writing! Schumer now has free reign over the committees, the calendar, AND modifying and weakening the filibuster. 

 

You have to watch the whole game and not just the ballcarrier...

 

Lol okay. I follow this stuff way closer than you do and actually know people who work on capital hill. You on the other hand just quote some leftist twitter feed in the palmer report that claims to be bipartisan but clearly isn't. 

 

McConnell may not have won any concessions from Schumer but he did extract a promise from one of the key democrats to not gut the filibuster and make no mistake, he will use that promise against the dems when the moment is right.

Edited by oldschool
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ctm said:

 

.....get rid of

 

Let's see what Sinema does, rather than says, when McConnell attempts to filibuster DACA.

 

The hope is that Manchin, Sinema, and Tester get on board later this year when McConnell blocks bill after Bill from coming up for vote. Either way McConnell has leverage on Sinema now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldschool said:

 

Lol okay. I follow this stuff way closer than you do and actually know people who work on capital hill. You on the other hand just quote some leftist twitter feed in the palmer report that claims to be bipartisan but clearly isn't. 

 

McConnell may not have won any concessions from Schumer but he did extract a promise from one of the key democrats to not gut he filibuster and make no mistake, he will use that promise against the dems when the moment is right.

 

And how is that not a win for Schumer? 

If you just don't like Schumer, just say that. Don't try to twist what the scoreboard says.

 

By the way, I work alongside a K-street lobbyist. LOL.   

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, oldschool said:

 

The hope is that Manchin, Sinema, and Tester get on board later this year when McConnell blocks bill after Bill from coming up for vote. Either way McConnell has leverage on Sinema now.

Schumer repeatedly said last night that democrats aren't going to allow republicans to filibuster the Biden agenda.  I took that to mean that reform of the filibuster will happen if it becomes necessary.  If that is the plan, then Sinema's pledge on elimination is meaningless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...