Jump to content

Gostowski: Keep or Cut?


Titansfan920

Gostowski: Keep or Cut?  

87 members have voted

  1. 1. What should the Titans do with Gostowski

    • Keep
      33
    • Cut
      54


Recommended Posts

Just now, oldschool said:

 

1/4 on kicks under 50 since Denver. Next?


One of those was blocked and not his fault.

 

Regardless, they aren’t going to cut him for missing a couple of kicks. And he has hit most of his kicks since Denver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, Starkiller said:


One of those was blocked and not his fault.

 

Regardless, they aren’t going to cut him for missing a couple of kicks. And he has hit most of his kicks since Denver.

 

1/3 without the blocked kick. He's missed 6 FGs and 2 XPs this year. If you think he's done missing kicks, I don't know what to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, oldschool said:

 

1/3 without the blocked kick. He's missed 6 FGs and 2 XPs this year. If you think he's done missing kicks, I don't know what to say.


You can admit to being overly emotional after a loss. Other than that there isn’t anything else to say.

 

Kickers miss sometimes. Even good ones. If you think changing the kickers up is a great idea, look back to last years carousel...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Starkiller said:


You can admit to being overly emotional after a loss. Other than that there isn’t anything else to say.

 

Kickers miss sometimes. Even good ones. If you think changing the kickers up is a great idea, look back to last years carousel...

 

Emotional? They guy has missed 8 kicks (6 fgs, 2 xps) in 6 games. If you think it was only the late game miss today that led to my opinion they should replace gostkowski then you aren't paying attention. He is a major liability through 6 games. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure of the timeline as to what went down with Succop, but they both had to have operations at one point.  Why did the Titans not try to keep Succop after his operation and instead decide to go get Gostkowski?  I don't think I was paying attention at the time it was going on back then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jonboy said:

Succop this year...10/12 on FGs and 19/20 on PATs. 

 

Gostkowski is 9/14 and 15/17 on PATs. 


If your point is we gave up on Succop too soon I think it’s a valid argument. But I also remember Succop looking even worse after he came back from his injury than Gostkowski looks now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, oldschool said:

 

Emotional? They guy has missed 8 kicks (6 fgs, 2 xps) in 6 games. If you think it was only the late game miss today that led to my opinion they should replace gostkowski then you aren't paying attention. He is a major liability through 6 games. 


He has been mostly good since Denver. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...