SuperFreak90 Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 I would guess late round 2 or early round 3. His biggest question marks leading up to the draft remain unanswered. I think everyone knew he had talent. Agree 100% late 2nd early 3rd at the latest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Bat.Shit.Crazy. He's looked the best of all rookie QB's according to people that know more than anyone on this board. That counts for nothing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonboy Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Drumroll......would you take him over Teddy!?!?!?!?!!?!? No, but I do think he has slightly more upside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 No, but I do think he has slightly more upside. Uh if you're drafting a franchise QB you ALWAYS take the QB that has more upside. Safe picks don't get you anywhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Face Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 No, but I do think he has slightly more upside. We're making some headway here......just jump aboard the train Jonboy, there's plenty of room for you! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 He's looked the best of all rookie QB's according to people that know more than anyone on this board. That counts for nothing? Looking good in preseason vs 2nd and 3rd string means something esp for a 6th rounder but it doesn't mean top 5, sorry. You're drastically over valuing what he's done so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Face Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 No, but I do think he has slightly more upside. We're making some headway here......just jump aboard the train Jonboy, there's plenty of room for you! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Looking good in preseason vs 2nd and 3rd string means something esp for a 6th rounder but it doesn't mean top 5, sorry. You're drastically over valuing what he's done so far. Not if I legitimately think he looks like a franchise QB that has that kind of talent. It's not about who he's faced. It's about watching the guy play. Are Adam Caplan or Greg Cosell overvaluing what he's done? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Come on scine. This is where people get off the train. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIKE75 Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Many mocks had Mettenberger in the second round. A couple even had us taking Mettenberger with our second round pick at #42 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 It's not about who he's faced. It's about watching the guy play. Which is part of how he's played. The game is slower when facing 2nd and 3rd stringers. Are Adam Caplan or Greg Cosell overvaluing what he's done? Are they saying he should've been a top 5 pick? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 They're saying he's been a top rookie. Bortles was a top 5 pick. Caplan is saying he's looked better than Bortles. I don't think there are any other rookie QB's even in the conversation except maybe Garopollo. Every single one of these guys is facing the same competition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 Come on scine. This is where people get off the train. Well we'll see if a couple of years whether I'm right or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reo Posted August 25, 2014 Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 People need to understand. It's this type of bullshit: I say he goes in the top 5 probably to Cleveland at #4 just after Bortles. That the "anti-Mett" crowd has been arguing against the entire time. There's not anyone around here that really hates Mett or doesn't want him to do well. It's just that some people around here are batshit crazy and go way too far w/ it. Settle down people. Take it down a notch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted August 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2014 I wouldn't post it reo if I didn't believe it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.