Jump to content

Scouting the Opposition: Texans - Week 2


Cyrus

Recommended Posts

Do this. Every. Week. Thanks!

 

I think I will be. :) I'll be DVRing the Titans opponent (or watching live if they're the afternoon game) every week. Thanks to whomever posted it as an article. Guru, I wasn't sure if you were back to your normal routine yet after being out of town. 

 

Expounding a bit on the original post (since I wanted it to be more bite-sized and posted earlier for discussion):

 

I think that this game truly comes down to pass-protection and the defensive line. The Texans secondary (and non-rush linebackers) obviously work in conjunction with their pass-rush but in this case their defense really starts and ends with their pass rush. Joseph is still a very solid outside corner and Kareem Jackson has been more stable as of late as a No. 2 CB but they're still a team that can really struggle against a team's 2nd to 4th receiver as we saw on Monday. Ultimately it was their pass rush that finally got to Rivers when the dam broke that lead to their comeback win.

 

The Titans have the skill players to win in the secondary, but if the Titans can't double Watt and still single block effectively in pass protection then the Titans will be in for a long day (assuming they leave a TE or RB in to help). The Texans shaky secondary will be a big assist for the Titans offensively on play action since the Texans safeties are more rush-defense guys who are better off flowing and filling. If the Titans can get the boot-action going I could see Swearinger and Keo being out of position.

 

Defensively, the Titans don't necessarily have the coverage to really defend against Andre Johnson for any sustained period of time, especially since Andre Johnson plays multiple alignments and McCourty doesn't flip sides. I can't see the Titans wanting to play man coverage very often which hurts the Titans ability to match-up Brown in coverage with Owen Daniels. Further, the Texans do an excellent job of getting their second TE involved in their pass game which can be a concern if the Titans don't play assignment sound football. 

 

For these reasons the Titans will really need to make sure that their pass rush gets home and they exploit any potential matchups on the line. If Morgan plays RDE and has success against Brown then it will be a huge win for the Titans since beating the left tackle is so key to pass pressure, but also because the Texans love to run left. Casey could be a good match-up for Brandon Brooks since he has quickness that Brooks may find that difficult at his size and lack of experience. If the defense is able to slow the Texans rushing attack, they'll be able to manufacture pressure that they otherwise wouldn't be able to do - so filling gaps and keeping the edge is going to be huge early on in this game (or making some big plays offensively early on). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the flip side:

 

The Titans C Rob Tuner was totally out matched creating pressure up the middle.

Jake Locker had a tough time when under pressure making accurate throws.

Stunts and blitzes seemed to confuse the Titans OL, Stewart got beat by Woodley on one play bad. 

The Titans WRs didn't seem to get much seperation against man coverage.

The Titans CBs played well in man coverage but were not tested by a WR the caliber of AJ.

While the Steelers didn't take advantage of Pollard he looks all of a 4.8 guy playing SS and might be worth throwing at.

The Texans just need to make sure they keep 2 bodies on Casey at all times. 

 

All true. But really the point of the article is "how did other teams attack the opposition" and what can the Titans do that's similar per their personnel?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering about the Ed Reed factor. He's still day-to-day so it may not even matter. I'm trying to decide whether it would be good or bad if he played. Yeah he's Ed Reed...but you'd have to think he'll be a little rusty in his first game back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering about the Ed Reed factor. He's still day-to-day so it may not even matter. I'm trying to decide whether it would be good or bad if he played. Yeah he's Ed Reed...but you'd have to think he'll be a little rusty in his first game back.

 

I honestly don't believe he will be playing this week. I think the day-to-day designation is more an injury report type thing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great article Cyrus!

I know we don't like to flip sides with Jmac, but I really think we should consider doing so this week. Our play calling could really be affected if they start constantly lining up Johnson on Verner's side. If they don't move them, then I guess the best we can do on blitzes is to constantly shade Griffin over the top in cover 1/3 and leave Hopkins on an island with our CB. When AJ is matched up on Verner, if it were me calling plays, I would have whichever LB on that side bracket him underneath with Griff over the top, essentially triple teaming him when he's on Verner. It leaves some ugly matches with the MLB on Foster, but I'll take my chances with Fokou on Foster over Verner in single coverage against AJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great article Cyrus!

I know we don't like to flip sides with Jmac, but I really think we should consider doing so this week. Our play calling could really be affected if they start constantly lining up Johnson on Verner's side. If they don't move them, then I guess the best we can do on blitzes is to constantly shade Griffin over the top in cover 1/3 and leave Hopkins on an island with our CB. When AJ is matched up on Verner, if it were me calling plays, I would have whichever LB on that side bracket him underneath with Griff over the top, essentially triple teaming him when he's on Verner. It leaves some ugly matches with the MLB on Foster, but I'll take my chances with Fokou on Foster over Verner in single coverage against AJ.

 

Interesting coverage idea to help Verner with an underneath LB, but with Texan's offensive precision doesn't that leave the LB in no man's land -- not in good enough position to help on AJohnson, yet too far removed to defend the run properly?  Also, with the more explosive Tate getting more carries, if run defense lanes are compromised it could be a long day for the Titans D.  Verner's short area quickness is pretty solid imo, but the long speed is where he loses.  Therefore, your earlier idea of the safety cheating to Verner's side is probably more sound to deal with Houston's balanced attack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reporter v report take from ESPN, including a decent dig at Kuharsky at the end

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/afcsouth/category/_/name/houston-texans

 

Ganguli: How has Gregg Williams changed the Titans' defense?  

Kuharsky: He’s not the coordinator, and Jerry Gray continues to call the plays. But Tennessee really mixed up its fronts against the Steelers. They didn’t blitz an immense amount but they were more unpredictable and more aggressive than they had been last year. 


I certainly felt like we were seeing Williams’ influence in those areas. Williams has certainly had a positive bearing on their aggressive approach to the game and on the team’s attitude. If guys like tackle Jurrell Casey and linebacker Zach Brown play like they did in the opener, they’ve developed some playmakers. If guys like end Ropati Pitoitua and linebackerMoise Fokou keep up their play from the opener, they’ve added some quality new pieces. 

,...

Kuharsky:  Pressure’s on you. First home game with ESPN.com since taking over the Texans. What happened to the guy who used to monitor that team for us?

Ganguli: I heard he got run off due to his refusal to pronounce the H in Houston. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting coverage idea to help Verner with an underneath LB, but with Texan's offensive precision doesn't that leave the LB in no man's land -- not in good enough position to help on AJohnson, yet too far removed to defend the run properly?  Also, with the more explosive Tate getting more carries, if run defense lanes are compromised it could be a long day for the Titans D.  Verner's short area quickness is pretty solid imo, but the long speed is where he loses.  Therefore, your earlier idea of the safety cheating to Verner's side is probably more sound to deal with Houston's balanced attack.

Good points. I don't think you constantly use a LB in that type of coverage. But the threat of AJ has to be accounted for, and Verner is very unlikely to pose a challenge to AJ. If he did, I would be very impressed, and if he can keep him from beating him deep then I'll think it's a success. On obvious run downs or if we're getting gashed then we can't use the LB to cover short flats against AJ.

 

There isn't any one answer to stopping AJ, but I could see us having some success and maybe getting a pic underneath because of their reliance on him from 20-20.

Edited by IsntLifeFunny
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's possible to cover AJ, Owens and the rookie WR. Casey and the DL is going to have to create inside pressure quickly to disrupt their offense, which seems way more likely than the CBs actually covering their WRs very long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All true. But really the point of the article is "how did other teams attack the opposition" and what can the Titans do that's similar per their personnel?

That's what I got from your post.  It's a way the Titans could attack the Texans.  I hope Munchak has a plan to win the game.  Not go in saying we can't do this, we can't do that.  It will be interesting and make the game more fun to watch to see if the Titans try to do some of these things tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...