Starkiller Posted yesterday at 06:12 AM Report Share Posted yesterday at 06:12 AM 7 hours ago, freakingeek said: Stowers is a phenomenal athlete. Good size and great hands. I wouldn't have a problem with taking him, particularly if we trade back. I don’t think Stowers is a good fit here. He’s more of a big slot receiver than a true TE. Well we just heavily invested in a slot WR, plus Dike got most of his snaps in the slot last year while Ridley was healthy. And if they want to go with the multi-TE look that teams showed last year then they would prefer TEs who can block as well as catch. Stowers is a poor blocker. NashvilleNinja, and freakingeek 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted 22 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, Starkiller said: I don’t think Stowers is a good fit here. He’s more of a big slot receiver than a true TE. Well we just heavily invested in a slot WR, plus Dike got most of his snaps in the slot last year while Ridley was healthy. And if they want to go with the multi-TE look that teams showed last year then they would prefer TEs who can block as well as catch. Stowers is a poor blocker. That's why I was thinking Roush would be the most likely of the tight ends they've brought in. Or maybe Kacmarek, but he was mostly a blocker for Ohio St. @AussieTitanFan08, I know Kac is your boy. Do you think he can be more than just a Bollinger clone? Callidus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted 21 hours ago Report Share Posted 21 hours ago I just don't think there's a good reason to pass on Stowers in the 2nd, if he's there. With Production like this in the SEC plus his athleticism, he seems like a sure thing. Justafan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted 21 hours ago Report Share Posted 21 hours ago (edited) Bellinger 2.0. he's fast as fuck and has the size to block. Edited 21 hours ago by TerryBoats Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted 21 hours ago Report Share Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, NashvilleNinja said: That's why I was thinking Roush would be the most likely of the tight ends they've brought in. Or maybe Kacmarek, but he was mostly a blocker for Ohio St. @AussieTitanFan08, I know Kac is your boy. Do you think he can be more than just a Bollinger clone? Given time Kacmarek could be one of the better blocking TE in the league. Callidus 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryBoats Posted 20 hours ago Report Share Posted 20 hours ago This TE class is stacked with athleticism. I hope they come away from the 2nd with a WR and early day 3 with a TE. There's strength in both of those areas. IsntLifeFunny 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted 15 hours ago Report Share Posted 15 hours ago 6 hours ago, TerryBoats said: I just don't think there's a good reason to pass on Stowers in the 2nd, if he's there. With Production like this in the SEC plus his athleticism, he seems like a sure thing. The good reason is he’s not a great fit, they already invested in a starting TE, and they have much bigger needs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted 14 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 14 hours ago 6 hours ago, AussieTitanFan08 said: Given time Kacmarek could be one of the better blocking TE in the league. Judging by the skillset of the guys the Titans have looked at they're probably looking at a guy who is more of a pass catcher or an all-around tight end. Do you think Kac could develop that skillset more or does he look like he'll only ever mainly be an extra lineman? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted 13 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, Starkiller said: The good reason is he’s not a great fit, they already invested in a starting TE, and they have much bigger needs Supposedly, but Bellinger was signed to be the Y, right? And all the guys they've been looking at kinda look like clones of Gunnar Helm, except for Sam Roush. Maybe they interest in most of them is a smokescreen where the one Borgonzi's really interested in is Roush. All the rest of them have traits like Helm, 240-250 lbs, ran a 4.7. Roush also ran a 4.7, but at nearly 270 lbs. You think maybe he sees Roush as his make-a-wish Kelce? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted 12 hours ago Report Share Posted 12 hours ago 40 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: Supposedly, but Bellinger was signed to be the Y, right? And all the guys they've been looking at kinda look like clones of Gunnar Helm, except for Sam Roush. Maybe they interest in most of them is a smokescreen where the one Borgonzi's really interested in is Roush. All the rest of them have traits like Helm, 240-250 lbs, ran a 4.7. Roush also ran a 4.7, but at nearly 270 lbs. You think maybe he sees Roush as his make-a-wish Kelce? Probably make a wish kittle more so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashvilleNinja Posted 11 hours ago Author Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Callidus said: Probably make a wish kittle more so How would you compare the two vs Kelce? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callidus Posted 11 hours ago Report Share Posted 11 hours ago 42 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said: How would you compare the two vs Kelce? Kelce to me is well roudned but primarily a pass catcher. Kittle is an insane blocker who happens to also be a very good target. NashvilleNinja 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bongo59 Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago Stowers remonds me of SHannon Sharpe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.