Jump to content

2018 Titans Report Dynasty League


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jamalisms said:

That's up to @Cyrus  ... but I would vote against, personally. I think rosters are pretty big already, especially with IR, and you don't want (I don't want) zero players of value in FA.

Yeah, there are already 5 IR spots. And we've got more bench space than just about any league I've ever played in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 850
  • Created
  • Last Reply

QBs undervalued in our league:

 

Aaron Rodgers42

Russell Wilson38

Carson Wentz36

Andrew Luck33

Kirk Cousins31

Deshaun Watson31

Cam Newton31

Jimmy Garoppolo30

Matthew Stafford30

Jameis Winston28

Matt Ryan26

Jared Goff26

Dak Prescott24

Marcus Mariota24

Baker Mayfield21

Patrick Mahomes20

Mitch Trubisky20

Derek Carr18

Drew Brees17

Tom Brady17

Alex Smith16

Josh Rosen15

Andy Dalton15

Philip Rivers14

Sam Darnold13

Ben Roethlisberger13

Lamar Jackson13

Josh Allen11

Case Keenum11

Blake Bortles10

Tyrod Taylor9

Ryan Tannehill7

Nick Foles6

Eli Manning6

Joe Flacco6

DeShone Kizer5

Mason Rudolph5

AJ McCarron5

Sam Bradford4

Teddy Bridgewater4

Trevor Siemian4

C.J. Beathard4

Davis Webb3

Kyle Lauletta3

Josh McCown3

Paxton Lynch2

Ryan Fitzpatrick2

Brian Hoyer2

Cody Kessler2

All Others1

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 9 Nines said:

QBs undervalued in our league:

 

Aaron Rodgers42

Russell Wilson38

Carson Wentz36

Andrew Luck33

Kirk Cousins31

Deshaun Watson31

Cam Newton31

Jimmy Garoppolo30

Matthew Stafford30

Jameis Winston28

Matt Ryan26

Jared Goff26

Dak Prescott24

Marcus Mariota24

Baker Mayfield21

Patrick Mahomes20

Mitch Trubisky20

Derek Carr18

Drew Brees17

Tom Brady17

Alex Smith16

Josh Rosen15

Andy Dalton15

Philip Rivers14

Sam Darnold13

Ben Roethlisberger13

Lamar Jackson13

Josh Allen11

Case Keenum11

Blake Bortles10

Tyrod Taylor9

Ryan Tannehill7

Nick Foles6

Eli Manning6

Joe Flacco6

DeShone Kizer5

Mason Rudolph5

AJ McCarron5

Sam Bradford4

Teddy Bridgewater4

Trevor Siemian4

C.J. Beathard4

Davis Webb3

Kyle Lauletta3

Josh McCown3

Paxton Lynch2

Ryan Fitzpatrick2

Brian Hoyer2

Cody Kessler2

All Others1

So @Jamalisms just gave up a pick for nothing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, abenjami said:

So @Jamalisms just gave up a pick for nothing?

Based on that model, although I disagree with Stafford's value.   I gained 4 points. Mayfield is 20 above and Chris Thompson is valued as 17 points on the same chart but I only pasted QBs. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, abenjami said:

So @Jamalisms just gave up a pick for nothing?

I really should have tried to trade near equal value and gotten Brady and Brees for Stafford. Could have thrown in McCown to guarantee it!

 

I missed out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my dear.  Based on this article, about fantasy football mistakes to avoid, we are all messing up in this draft.  We are all doing the number one mistake it advises you avoid:

 

Rookie Mania

 

In the immediate wake of the NFL Draft, this is one of the most important things to remember. Most rookies will fail. Even more of the rookies will fail to make an impact their first year.

 

This year’s draft class has a ton of talent, but it is foolish to assume that all of the rookies are going to come in and immediately overtake all of the starters. It’s not going to happen. Sure, every season will have a Kareem Hunt  and an Alvin Kamara.

 

But every season will also have a John Ross  and a Corey Davis. I am not suggesting that you should ignore rookies completely, just merely to exercise caution. Treat rookies like the unknowns that they are.

 

During your draft, there will be a time to draft for ceiling and a time to draft for floor. Balancing the two is essential. Rookies are mostly ceiling plays. Obviously, Sony Michel has RB1 upside on the Patriots, but he also has a floor of unstartable. Keep that in mind when deciding if you want to take a shot on a rookie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 9 Nines said:

We are all doing the number one mistake it advises you avoid:

What's that? Only a moron would expect their rookies to perform week in and week out and base their weekly roster on rookies at this point of the year.

 

2 hours ago, 9 Nines said:

Any roster expansion?

Fuck no, again.. No one in their right mind would want that. It doesn't take skill just accumulating as much shit as possible never making a tough roster decision. This is already an unnecessarily large bench and massive IR spots that diminishes skill a crazy amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wiscotitansfan said:

What's that? Only a moron would expect their rookies to perform week in and week out and base their weekly roster on rookies at this point of the year.

 

Fuck no, again.. No one in their right mind would want that. It doesn't take skill just accumulating as much shit as possible never making a tough roster decision. This is already an unnecessarily large bench and massive IR spots that diminishes skill a crazy amount.

It's not "unnecessarily" large. It's a dynasty league with the only draft a 3 round rookie draft. It's a deep bench for a reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, NashvilleNinja said:

It's not "unnecessarily" large. It's a dynasty league with the only draft a 3 round rookie draft. It's a deep bench for a reason.

I get that but it's still probably a larger bench than other dynasty leagues... obviously it is not supposed to be on the same scope as redrafts but at this point there are very few ridiculously tough choices to make in terms of finding space to stash guys. We still have plenty of space to have our roster, have our young guys waiting to take their starting role/potential and then there are more than enough spaces to keep guys you have a hunch on or want to take a flyer.

 

When guys are on bye, usually all you have to do is just drop the guy you are hoping to hit the lotto on and very rarely are you dropping a commodity that people will immediately want to scoop up and actually bid each other for. IMO that defines an unnecessarily large bench.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...