Frank Andbeans Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 On 1/20/2017 at 5:42 PM, KingTitan8 said: If we stay were we are I want to go Foster then Lattimore. Get rid of woodyard put him in with Williamson. Opinions? 1st off I would challenge the notion that Foster is or will be an elite player. He plain isn't. 2nd I would point out that IF Foster were an elite player, he would be replacing Williamson. There are two separate ILB positions. Foster fills the one of the more traditional, responsible run-gap mike backer. He isn't a good fit for the more WLB-type ILB, with differeing coverage responsibilities, that Woodyard has been playing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 14 minutes ago, Frank Andbeans said: 1st off I would challenge the notion that Foster is or will be an elite player. He plain isn't. 2nd I would point out that IF Foster were an elite player, he would be replacing Williamson. There are two separate ILB positions. Foster fills the one of the more traditional, responsible run-gap mike backer. He isn't a good fit for the more WLB-type ILB, with differeing coverage responsibilities, that Woodyard has been playing. Foster could player either inside LB position and would be better than Woodyard and Williamson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 Hooker is the best pure FS prospect I've seen since Earl Thomas. If J-Rob decides to go with Adams or not take a safety at all, I of course trust his judgement over mine. But this kid will be a stud. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 So he had hernia and labrum surgery? that's rough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChosenTitan Posted March 1, 2017 Report Share Posted March 1, 2017 1 hour ago, Frank Andbeans said: 1st off I would challenge the notion that Foster is or will be an elite player. He plain isn't. 2nd I would point out that IF Foster were an elite player, he would be replacing Williamson. There are two separate ILB positions. Foster fills the one of the more traditional, responsible run-gap mike backer. He isn't a good fit for the more WLB-type ILB, with differeing coverage responsibilities, that Woodyard has been playing. woodyard sucks dude Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeedoeLaw Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Adams or Hooker for me at 5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
headhunter Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 I like Hooker more than Adams Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeedoeLaw Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 1 minute ago, headhunter said: I like Hooker more than Adams Tit for tat as far as I'm concerned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Adams and Hooker are both good for different reasons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dmeade- Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 1 minute ago, OILERMAN said: Adams and Hooker are both good for different reasons I agree. I like Hooker at 5 though for his reasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huston Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Do we run enough single high to make up for his poor run play? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, Huston said: Do we run enough single high to make up for his poor run play? I don't know what we plan to do in that regard but I do know that the parts of his game that can't be coached more than make up for the parts that are super coachable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 30 minutes ago, Dmeade- said: I agree. I like Hooker at 5 though for his reasons. I'd be happy with either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Seems like we can't go wrong with Adams or Hooker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.