Legaltitan Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Double down - and it's opposite, walk back Pivot full-throated endorsement optics What else you got? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WVTITAN Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Legaltitan said: Double down - and it's opposite, walk back Pivot full-throated endorsement optics What else you got? I think you should add Believe Me as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted July 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Just now, WVTITAN said: I think you should add Believe Me as well. lol but this list is for phrases the pundits use Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondra316v2 Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 "comprehensive ______ reform" "nationwide conversation" "fight for ______" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted July 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 surrogate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Nines Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Trump beat 16 opponents, implying how effective has campaign was in the primaries, is repeated too much. I think one could make a case that the reason he won the primary was because he had so many opponents. He had a core 20% or so of supporters. Adding to it to get into the 30s, but as opponents dropped up, his vote did not go up much. So it looked like his ceiling was around 40%. Had one candidate or two had financing to remain in the primary, the odds were that either one of them would win or it would be a contested convention (Trump would not get the delegates needed.) So I do not think Trump beat 16 opponents, the many opponents allowed Trump to win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 There wasn't 16 candidates that he beat He beat Cruz, big deal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted July 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Wrong topic. You guys are doing it wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9 Nines Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 1 minute ago, Legaltitan said: Wrong topic. You guys are doing it wrong. Trump surrogates are always saying, "he beat 16 opponents." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legaltitan Posted July 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Just now, 9 Nines said: Trump surrogates are always saying, "he beat 16 opponents." OK, I'll let that pass. Although you are on thin ice here. No paragraphs or rants, just words and phrases. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 clean coal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chef Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 This from 1-2 cycles ago, but "drill down" really got old in politics and then business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little Earl Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Change we can believe in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siamesedinasour Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 Common sense approach - which obviously means my approach Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted July 29, 2016 Report Share Posted July 29, 2016 I would like to see "full-throated endorsement" stick around for this election. There's a good Monica Lewinsky joke in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.