Jump to content

Mett show continues...in SD


Ricky

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, 52O said:

Lol..."locker never consistently won...locker would be good for one game but In a four game span mett"

 

Yall silly. 

What about a 10 game span?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 224
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 hours ago, 52O said:

Lol..."locker never consistently won...locker would be good for one game but In a four game span mett"

 

Yall silly. 

You are right.  4 game span... 

Locker= occasional win 

Mett= 4 game losing streak. 

 

Mett all the way. Duh

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the point in their careers where they were both members of the Titans?  I'd take Locker no question.  He was extremely limited but at least he was a pro and you could design an offense to eek out some wins with him with the right personnel.

Mett right now or last year was the worst combination of bravado, lack of preparation, over confidence and lack of understanding of the game.  You can't win with a guy like that no matter what you do.

Long term I agree, Mett has more potential solely by virtue of him being young and his arm talent.  Locker hit his peek, and it was a pretty low peek.

But is Mett ever capable of having a game like the two 520 named, Detroit in particular?  I really don't know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Soxcat said:

After all is said and done the only choice would be Mett.  Locker was hurt more than healthy so even if he could bang out a good game on occasion (hardly possible) he couldn't stay healthy.  So we have a QB that sucks and can't stay ehalthy.  At least Mett can walk form the bus to the field and not get hurt. 

But the question is about ONE game, not a season. If I had to bet my life on one game, it would be Locker. He might not be a great QB or anything, but he showed the will to lay it all on the line. He won games, and at times made the team better. Did Mett ever do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Mythos27 said:

You normally take the guy who looks like a far better passer against better competition in college. Athleticism rarely, if ever, translates. A guy that only completed 54% of his passes in college isn't even really draftable IMO.

The sample size has been infinitely less in the history of the NFL and ... especially in the last 5 years, athleticism actually has translated. And teams are very much drafting with the ability to move in mind.

We've actually kind of changed to statues rarely translating of late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, big2033 said:

The sample size has been infinitely less in the history of the NFL and ... especially in the last 5 years, athleticism actually has translated. And teams are very much drafting with the ability to move in mind.

We've actually kind of changed to statues rarely translating of late.

I should have been more clear. I meant athleticism as a QB's primary strength.I'm speaking specifically about guys like Locker, Tebow, etc who were clearly deficient as passers but had elite athleticism. Accuracy, poise, pocket-manipulation, anticipation, good decision making, etc should all come before athleticism. Of course if you get a guy who has all of this and just happens to be an elite athlete like Wilson or Mariota, you've struck pure gold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Legaltitan said:

At the point in their careers where they were both members of the Titans?  I'd take Locker no question.  He was extremely limited but at least he was a pro and you could design an offense to eek out some wins with him with the right personnel.

Mett right now or last year was the worst combination of bravado, lack of preparation, over confidence and lack of understanding of the game.  You can't win with a guy like that no matter what you do.

Long term I agree, Mett has more potential solely by virtue of him being young and his arm talent.  Locker hit his peek, and it was a pretty low peek.

But is Mett ever capable of having a game like the two 520 named, Detroit in particular?  I really don't know.

That Detroit game gets referenced way too much. If I recall locker had 3 long tds due to 3 of the worst Safety plays I've ever seen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldschool said:

That Detroit game gets referenced way too much. If I recall locker had 3 long tds due to 3 of the worst Safety plays I've ever seen. 

That game was fucking terrible for being a career definer. He had the 2 QTRs in the Jets game too.

Those were his shining moments. The SD game everyone keeps referencing to, Hunter out of all people bailed him out from his under/overthrown balls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Titans279 said:

Until inevitably this happens

lockerpinballedjetsd.gif

The Browns (maybe Bengals) game injury was more likely because it was him getting hit on his own accord, that imo is no different than an injury from a sack. But the Browns one was fucking hilarious because he ran into contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, wiscotitansfan said:

The Browns (maybe Bengals) game injury was more likely because it was him getting hit on his own accord, that imo is no different than an injury from a sack. But the Browns one was fucking hilarious because he ran into contact.

lockerhead.0.gif

Lol looks like a forearm to the head to me...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...