BudsOilers Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 It's not a slight on Wilson because they run the ball (in part because of him) great and therefore pass it less than other teams. It's how they want to play and almost all of the time they impose their will and dictate the flow of the game. Given a choice of running it 40 times or throwing it 40 times, Carroll (and most coaches) will run it when it works as effectively as their run game does. They are not running it because they are afraid to have Wilson pass it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 Lil Ryan or Stafford on Seattle would likely go 16-0 Not even close. I feel like you are mistaking throwing for lots of yards with good quarterbacking. Stafford is another Dante Culpepper, throwing to the most dominant WR of our generation. Ryan enjoyed arguably the best WR duo in the league for years. Even then they don't stack up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 How do y'all know Baldwin l/kearse wouldn't be good on a pass heavy team? Baldwin is solid, but kearse is slow as hell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 Wilson also rushed for 849 yards and 6 TD's in the regular season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamlngEnvy Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 Ya I included his TDs so its 26 total TDs. Still not two per game.....and once he's worth 100million$ he will not run 160 times a year... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted January 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 It's not even worth debating any more..... Wilson doesn't get injured and protects himself very well for someone who runs so much. He passes the ball as effectively as any QB in the league and has the weakest supporting cast among top QBs. Efficient passing is what counts, not volume. Last week not withstanding he doesn't make mistakes that loses games When he has to bring the team from behind he's routinely succeeding If I had to have a QB for next season he'd likely be in the top 3 or 4. Btowner, and XAEA12 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted January 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 If looking at QBs for the long haul he might be close to #1 at his current age. The only guy who he has competition with is Luck and I'm not sure I don't like Wilson better. That's a no brainer, but I'm talking about right now, next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted January 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 I'd still take Rodgers and Brady but after that Wilson comes into play Soxcat 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bondra316v2 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 I'm as big of a fan of Wilson as there is, and I would take Rodgers if given a choice. At least for the next couple seasons. But this stat is incredible by any standard. Wilson is 10-0 against Super Bowl winning QB's. 3-0 against Rodgers, 2-0 against Eli, 2-0 against Peyton, 2-0 against Brees, and 1-0 against Brady. Even with the poor performance against Green Bay, he still has a 2-1 td:int ratio. Dude just wins. He goes 11-0 next week and wins back to back there might even be dynasty talk while he is still on his rookie contract. That's amazing stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 Kearse ran a 4.43 at his pro day. Not exactly slow. Every knows Kearse caught 63 balls for 1000 yards and 12 TDs with the great Jake Locker as his QB right...... Locker threw for 2200 yards that season and almost half of his yards were to Kearse. I still can't get over the fact we drafted such a crappy college QB that early in the draft.. I see what you're getting at, but I'm not really into 40 times from years ago, especially at a pro day vs the draft. Same thing with the college stats, its 1,000 yards in college in the prolific PAC 12. Ugh, don't even wanna think about Locker anymore. Can't wait til he's cut. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAEA12 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 I'd still take Rodgers and Brady but after that Wilson comes into play Did you see Rodgers' below average stat on game winning come backs? I thought that was practically alarming. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StephenIsLegend Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 It's still pretty crazy to think that Wilson could win his second super bowl already. But not so crazy to think because of all the factors working FOR him. MamlngEnvy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MamlngEnvy Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 I'm as big of a fan of Wilson as there is, and I would take Rodgers if given a choice. At least for the next couple seasons. But this stat is incredible by any standard. Wilson is 10-0 against Super Bowl winning QB's. 3-0 against Rodgers, 2-0 against Eli, 2-0 against Peyton, 2-0 against Brees, and 1-0 against Brady. Even with the poor performance against Green Bay, he still has a 2-1 td:int ratio. Dude just wins. He goes 11-0 next week and wins back to back there might even be dynasty talk while he is still on his rookie contract. That's amazing stuff. That "stat" about being 10-0 vs super bowl winning qbs has absolutely ∅ to do with his 10 points a game and 100% to do with the insane defense that he Has the luxury of playing with. And yaa he's on his rookie contract He's gonna get a 1000% raise in coming weeks.....he's gonna be asked to carry a team soon. Can he? One or two games a year...maybe...two to three seasons in a row..doubtful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
apocalypse33 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 Not even close. I feel like you are mistaking throwing for lots of yards with good quarterbacking. Stafford is another Dante Culpepper, throwing to the most dominant WR of our generation. Ryan enjoyed arguably the best WR duo in the league for years. Even then they don't stack up. Ryan is actually a good qb, Stafford is not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
apocalypse33 Posted January 21, 2015 Report Share Posted January 21, 2015 Did you see Rodgers' below average stat on game winning come backs? I thought that was practically alarming. he's not clutch! ZOMG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.