Pragidealist Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 http://titansized.com/2013/07/19/comparing-tennessee-titans-qb-jake-locker-to-andrew-luck/ Just a comparison of the stats.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Pretty biased, homer comparison of the stats. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 What an absurd article. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragidealist Posted July 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 *shrugs* Sure, if you say so. I thought it seemed a pretty cut and dry stat comparison. No real context. Take whatever meaning you want.. I just came across it as I sit here on a conference call and thought some would want to read it. I didn't look very closely at it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OILERMAN Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 While there are obvious scheme and personnel differences (AKA: context) that isn't taken into consideration, I think it does show that Locker shouldn't already be written off, despite the best efforts of Tim, CMJ, and others. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I'm going to ask this question again. Other than Tim who actually thinks Locker is already a bust? CMJ doesn't count. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
freakingeek Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 2014 will be a better time to compare Luck and Locker but if you can't see that Luck is obviously a better QB at this point in their careers, you're not watching too closely. This is one comparison where stats don't mean shit. I personally believe that Locker will become a good NFL QB but I also think Luck could potentially be better than either Manning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 http://titansized.com/2013/07/19/comparing-tennessee-titans-qb-jake-locker-to-andrew-luck/ Just a comparison of the stats.... You picked a bad place to post this article, even though nearly 100% of the posters on this board think Locker's injury affected his game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 I'm going to ask this question again. Other than Tim who actually thinks Locker is already a bust? CMJ doesn't count. Yeah, Cmj is not even human. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eighteen Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Yeah, he's a troll-bot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denali Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 You picked a bad place to post this article, even though nearly 100% of the posters on this board think Locker's injury affected his game. But most of those posters also thought he wasn't that good before the injury anyway. From the title of this thread, I thought it was going to be a "complete the sentence" type of thing as in "Locker and Luck ... don't belong in the same sentence, except to say that Luck is way better than Locker." I mean, let's be real here. He has been disappointing so far to say the least. I hope he can turn things around, but with the coaching staff he tried to learn from so far, and the current coaching staff there now, the odds are against it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChosenTitan Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Luck is overrated though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Locker has trouble with pre and post snap reads. He has trouble manipulating the defense with his eyes. He also has trouble moving in the pocket to buy time for his receivers. Luck has those four things in spades. I will say that I'm tired of hearing how complicated Luck's system was, especially when comparing him to Locker. Palmer had Jake in one of the most complex systems ever known to football. When four of your receivers have four different routes they can choose, all being dictated by coverage, that's tough for anyone. Locker's system was easily more complex than what Luck faced as a rookie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WG53 Posted July 22, 2013 Report Share Posted July 22, 2013 Luck is overrated though Not really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.