Jump to content

One stat that exemplies why Vrabel is a retard


BudsOilers

Recommended Posts

Just now, IsntLifeFunny said:

No, the fanbase just wants Vrabel to fawn over the rookie QB and they only tolerated Tannehill

 

Lol it couldn't be more obvious. 

That's 100% true.   It's also 100% true that if Tannehill had played the exact same game Levis did last night, he'd be getting skewered on here and by the media.

 

You guys did the same thing with Mariota. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

BTW have you guys read twitter - there's a whole thing about how Vrabel hates Levis because he said he made some bad throws/decisions (which he did).....It's absolutely the desire of a big % of the fan base to want Vrabel to fawn over Levis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, pat said:

Vrabel is wrong vs Levis wrong… why not both?

 

I think pool boy should have gotten a third shot after missing twice.

Vrabel not allowing a third shot to score was asinine.  He's clearly wrong there.  Where the retards are wrong is in trying to exonerate Levis and blame Spears for the 2nd down throw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

It really is fun how easy it is to get under Bud's skin.

 

No, the fanbase just wants Vrabel to fawn over the rookie QB and they only tolerated Tannehill

 

Lol it couldn't be more obvious. 

 

Oops dumb fuck.  It's absolutely a thing.  There's even one thread on here speculating that Vrabel didn't want Levis.....Idiot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright... yeah. Just watched the sky view.

 

The idea that Spears gave up on the route is outright false. He knew he was open the moment he broke the first level of defenders.

 

The throw was lazy or at least was overconfidence in an arm throw. Levis did a good job waiting for the safety to clear which is why he figured he needed to quickly flick it in there. It was a wide window and I think Levis believed he could make it, but he did have time to throw it properly. 

 

I'll also say that Spears was probably expecting an easy catch and did a terrible job of adjusting. That said... its on Levis. If he puts it in the spot it was supposed to (literally just lead him to the pylon), Spears would have no reason to adjust and its an easy td. This is consistent with his inconsistent ball placement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

That's fine. It was still a catchable ball if Spears was a more natural receiver. The ball was misplaced. That has absolutely nothing to do with not going for it on 3rd down and giving up. Bud is mentioning it to cast shade on Levis in an otherwise really damn good performance. It's obvious. 

Catchable , yeah.  Would it have been difficult that he was contorting , yes. 
 

Still doesn’t absolve Vrabel for the turtle move on 3rd down.  Or the OL stuff.  I’m more confident now that they can find a WR than a LT at this point which is weird given our history at those positions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BudsOilers said:

Vrabel said the decision was because Levis had messed up the prior two pass plays.....which was factual.

Considering this was Levis 2nd career start, issues on the oline and overall lack of skill player production, it’s totally reasonable to do what Vrabel did in this scenario.  It was totally a concervative move because he didn’t want to lose those points…..

 

you can argue that he should have been more aggressive, but to act like it’s a fireable offense to be ultra conservative given the circumstances is ridiculous.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BudsOilers said:

Buckle up because the Tards and Homers are going to shift into nothing is the QB's fault mode now that it's an ABT solution......

Levi’s is a rookie starting his 2nd game….lol

 

You really need to get over Tanny man.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, VaTitan said:

Considering this was Levis 2nd career start, issues on the oline and overall lack of skill player production, it’s totally reasonable to do what Vrabel did in this scenario.  It was totally a concervative move because he didn’t want to lose those points…..

 

you can argue that he should have been more aggressive, but to act like it’s a fireable offense to be ultra conservative given the circumstances is ridiculous.

 

And it helped lose the game.  The inability to fix the OL or help the OL through pass first is what are fireable offenses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

And it helped lose the game.  The inability to fix the OL or help the OL through pass first is what are fireable offenses. 

I agree Vrabel has underperformed on developing the oline.  But why do you keep trying to pin personnel issues on Vrabel.?  You did the same with Willis.  You’re right that the lack of talent on this roster is a fireable offense….and JRob got fired for it last season.  
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, VaTitan said:

Levi’s is a rookie starting his 2nd game….lol

 

You really need to get over Tanny man.  

Nothing to do with Tannehill.  I've already said they should play Levis for the rest of the season.  But I've seen you idiots do this with VY, Locker, Mettenberger, and Mariota. 

 

We ALREADY see it with people unable to say Levis made a bad throw or decision.  This thread and twitter is filled with the dissection of this play and anyone without bias and with knowledge would say it was a bad throw.  A decent segment of the fan base and media are upset Vrabel isn't praising Levis enough and that he had the nerve to point out a couple of bad plays.  It will be this way for a while.  People are giddy because the QB represents potential hope in the future.  Nothing more.

 

Meanwhile, I'll be the same one actually looking at the All 22 stuff and praising or criticizing since I actually understand what I'm looking at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, BudsOilers said:

 

Oops dumb fuck.  It's absolutely a thing.  There's even one thread on here speculating that Vrabel didn't want Levis.....Idiot.

I didn't say anything otherwise. It's the fact you're upset about it or overreaction g and being passive aggressive as usual which is the funny part. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VaTitan said:

I agree Vrabel has underperformed on developing the oline.  But why do you keep trying to pin personnel issues on Vrabel.?  You did the same with Willis.  You’re right that the lack of talent on this roster is a fireable offense….and JRob got fired for it last season.  
 

 

Not playing Radunz when he's clearly better than Dillard or NPF is on Vrabel.  Having an idiotic 1st down run ratio that exposes the worst pass blocking unit in football is on Vrabel.  Gadget plays in the RZ that are failing......Things that have derailed the offense. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...