Jump to content

Argentina's Trump bound for Presidency?


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Justafan said:

This is too much to respond to on my phone but… you say you never did that but then turn around and do exactly that. It’s a lie that conservatives denied civil rights and liberal were the saviors. Both sides had people against and for civil rights. It’s disingenuous to pretend like modern day democrats were some saviors when many of them have nothing at all in common. The fascist stuff is ridiculous and inflammatory rhetoric from a zealot and nothing more. 

Stop making shit up. You don’t get to rewrite history as part of your “both sides” story.
 

I’m sure you find Fox News just as convincing as the rest of your fellow conservatives but that doesn’t make it real…

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 584
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Pure nonsense.  Byrd, Gore and Fulbright were liberal Democrats to name a few.   In fact the more Republican the South has become, the less racist.

“Libertarian”   LOL you fucking suckers 

They're 100% centrists at the least by international standards

Posted Images

Just now, Starkiller said:

Stop making shit up. You don’t get to rewrite history as part of your “both sides” story.
 

I’m sure you find Fox News just as convincing as the rest of your fellow conservatives but that doesn’t make it real…

Did you or did you not immediately take my definition of fascism and pin that on the modern conservatives and then proceed to call me conservative when I’ve repeatedly said I’m not? 
 

Again, you people are incapable of adult conversation. You just hurl

vitriol, spout political dogma, and make shit up to fit your narrative. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Justafan said:

Did you or did you not immediately take my definition of fascism and pin that on the modern conservatives

1. your definition of fascism isn’t fascism. 

2. I specifically said the MAGAs are fascists, not conservatives as a whole. Stop lying about what I said. 

 

 

9 minutes ago, Justafan said:

and then proceed to call me conservative when I’ve repeatedly said I’m not? 

You can claim to be the king of England but that doesn’t make it so.
 

You are a conservative. I have no idea why you try to deny it. Everything you say screams traditional conservative. Feel free to take an online test to see where you fall on the political spectrum if you don’t believe me. 
 

Regardless, you sound like Soxcat when he claimed to be a moderate. He got soundly mocked for that one. 

 

 

9 minutes ago, Justafan said:

Again, you people are incapable of adult conversation. You just hurl

vitriol, spout political dogma, and make shit up to fit your narrative. 

Not sure what “vitriol” you think I’m hurling. You just seem to want to paint yourself as a victim and twist history to fit your narrative that both sides are the same. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Starkiller said:

1. your definition of fascism isn’t fascism. 

2. I specifically said the MAGAs are fascists, not conservatives as a whole. Stop lying about what I said. 

 

 

You can claim to be the king of England but that doesn’t make it so.
 

You are a conservative. I have no idea why you try to deny it. Everything you say screams traditional conservative. Feel free to take an online test to see where you fall on the political spectrum if you don’t believe me. 
 

Regardless, you sound like Soxcat when he claimed to be a moderate. He got soundly mocked for that one. 

 

 

Not sure what “vitriol” you think I’m hurling. You just seem to want to paint yourself as a victim and twist history to fit your narrative that both sides are the same. 

Incapable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Starkiller said:

I’m the one trying to have an adult conversation. You’re the one throwing a fit. But fine, I’ll just stop trying…

No, you don’t get to throw stones and then play victim. Here’s a hint, the guy throwing around accusations of fascism isn’t trying to have an adult conversation. The guy who is obsessed with calling people what they want to be called but then continues to refer to me as something I’ve asked him not to is a hypocrite. The guy who pretends like there’s no vitriol or attacks but then partakes and joins in is a liar. 
 

Save the BS. I didn’t even want to have this conversation, you did. The least you could do is convey your points respectfully, but you are…. Incapable. 

Edited by Justafan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeesh...  Both of you.   "I don't want to have this conversation but, I can't let you get the last word.  Getting the last word is how I win this conversation I didn't want to have so neener neener!!  I know you are but what am I".    Give it a rest already. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MadMax said:

Jeesh...  Both of you.   "I don't want to have this conversation but, I can't let you get the last word.  Getting the last word is how I win this conversation I didn't want to have so neener neener!!  I know you are but what am I".    Give it a rest already. 

Seriously? NOW you got something to say? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Justafan said:

Seriously? NOW you got something to say? 

No.  No I don't.  I gave up pages ago.  I'm just wondering how long you two are gonna say the same stuff back and forth to get the last word.  Now feel free to retort.  I'm conceding by not responding.  You win.  Huzzah.

Edited by MadMax
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been enjoying the back and forth between sk and jf but godddamn. Justa is literally, repeatedly, saying what happened did not actually happen.

 

Yes, the southern strategy happened. You can say it didn't ad nauseum but you're dead wrong. The conservative democrats of that age are 💯 percent Republicans now. They absolutely changed parties. It is fucking ridiculous that this very observable fact is being attacked.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WG53 said:

I've been enjoying the back and forth between sk and jf but godddamn. Justa is literally, repeatedly, saying what happened did not actually happen.

 

Yes, the southern strategy happened. You can say it didn't ad nauseum but you're dead wrong. The conservative democrats of that age are 💯 percent Republicans now. They absolutely changed parties. It is fucking ridiculous that this very observable fact is being attacked.

 

 

I'm not saying the Southern strategy wasn't a thing or that many didn't change parties. Of course, they did. If someone tried to say that Democrats were racist based on their voting record, I would bring up many of the same points. The Democrats of that day are not representative of Democrats today, so it wouldn't be fair to say Dems were racist based on that voting record. My point is that it is an inaccurate representation to pretend that only 'conservatives' fought for civil rights and 'progressives' were fighting for civil rights. That's an unfair representation of what happened. 

 

Plenty of progressives and conservatives were on both sides of that issue in both parties and to pretend there weren't is disingenuous. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Justafan said:

I'm not saying the Southern strategy wasn't a thing or that many didn't change parties. Of course, they did. If someone tried to say that Democrats were racist based on their voting record, I would bring up many of the same points. The Democrats of that day are not representative of Democrats today, so it wouldn't be fair to say Dems were racist based on that voting record. My point is that it is an inaccurate representation to pretend that only 'conservatives' fought for civil rights and 'progressives' were fighting for civil rights. That's an unfair representation of what happened. 

 

Plenty of progressives and conservatives were on both sides of that issue in both parties and to pretend there weren't is disingenuous. 

If you are making the point that people from all walks of life can/are be racist and prejudice...then I agree. Southerners were not and are not the only racists. But yes, the parties did split along their lines by how they reacted to the Civil rights act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...