IowaOiler Posted May 10, 2023 Report Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, Mythos27 said: You said, that he said false rape accusations are ok. He didn't say that. Nope, I didn't. That was @Thrill that indicated that. Try again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted May 10, 2023 Report Share Posted May 10, 2023 On 5/9/2023 at 6:09 PM, IowaOiler said: The only ignorant buffoons on this topic are you and the rest (who've wisely departed the thread) claiming that it's ok for women to make false allegations. That's 100% it. These are rare occurrences, even if they aren't overly common. Most of the time, however, the people being accused aren't rich...and those people get fucked. That's actually a pretty spot on analogy. This you @IowaOiler? You're clearly saying that he said it's ok for women to make false allegations. You gonna deny it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted May 10, 2023 Report Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, Mythos27 said: This you @IowaOiler? Yeah, that's me. They were all indicating that it was no big deal to make false allegations. @Starkiller has said numerous times that Araiza will be fine, and then launched insults at those who disagreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted May 10, 2023 Report Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, IowaOiler said: Yeah, that's me. They were all indicating that it was no big deal to make false allegations. @Starkiller has said numerous times that Araiza will be fine, and then launched insults at those who disagreed. Exactly. There should have been 0 push back to what I said because I was objectively right. I've been solid on disagreeing with his overall stance. I just also disagree with some of the other shit I read and not just from you, which is why I didn't single you out from the beginning. You're just the one that decided to respond. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted May 10, 2023 Report Share Posted May 10, 2023 Just now, Mythos27 said: Exactly. There should have been 0 push back to what I said because I was objectively right. I've been solid on disagreeing with his overall stance. I just also disagree with some of the other shit I read and not just from you, which is why I didn't single you out from the beginning. You're just the one that decided to respond. I respond when people choose politics over what's correct. I promise that you wouldn't put up a fight when people of your political ilk misrepresent the other. It's a problem on both sides, but we should be able to rally around what's objectively correct. Instead, many wait until sides are drawn. Those who speak up early but want to keep there street cred politically, will do what you did...respond, and then come to the defense of their side on an entirely unrelated issue. He absolutely alluded to it being no big deal...he didn't outright say it, no...but nobody outside of a fellow follower of his political ideology walks away from his posts thinking it's a misrepresentation to say he thinks false accusations are no big deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 2 hours ago, IowaOiler said: Yeah, that's me. They were all indicating that it was no big deal to make false allegations. @Starkiller has said numerous times that Araiza will be fine, and then launched insults at those who disagreed. Feel free to quote a single time in this thread that I insulted anyone who disagreed with me on Araiza… Stop putting words in my fucking mouth. If you want to disagree with what I’ve actually said, I’m all for that. But don’t lie about my comments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrill Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 4 hours ago, IowaOiler said: Nope, I didn't. That was @Thrill that indicated that. Try again. Lol stfu. I never said they’re ok. I said I’m not losing sleep over it. It’s only old folks like you who think it’s some existential crisis that a small percentage of dudes get falsely accused. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No1TitansFan Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 5/9/2023 at 9:14 PM, IowaOiler said: I actually think you make an astute point, and I think it comes down to really a change in our societal norms. I'm a pro-gun guy...full disclosure...but when our system took shape, most people not only owned firearms, but carried them regularly. That is what offset the system, and allowed us to really require evidence and due process....the odds of someone victimizing more than one person, without facing a firearm in defense, was rare. That's actually demonstrably untrue, not that it's relevant to this conversation. It's a false premise that's been promulgated by pro gun groups that's easily refuted. Approximately 15-20% of people owned guns and a lot of them didn't work. The revolutionary war started when the British moved to seize an armory where the local militia's arms were stored; which was the common way of arming citizens back then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaOiler Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 7 hours ago, Starkiller said: Feel free to quote a single time in this thread that I insulted anyone who disagreed with me on Araiza… Stop putting words in my fucking mouth. If you want to disagree with what I’ve actually said, I’m all for that. But don’t lie about my comments. I don't give two shits what you're 'all for.' You consistently try to drive every post into politics so you can condescend to those that think you're wrong. 5 hours ago, Thrill said: Lol stfu. I never said they’re ok. I said I’m not losing sleep over it. It’s only old folks like you who think it’s some existential crisis that a small percentage of dudes get falsely accused of women that don't get justice. Does that work? 4 hours ago, No1TitansFan said: That's actually demonstrably untrue, not that it's relevant to this conversation. It's a false premise that's been promulgated by pro gun groups that's easily refuted. Approximately 15-20% of people owned guns and a lot of them didn't work. The revolutionary war started when the British moved to seize an armory where the local militia's arms were stored; which was the common way of arming citizens back then. Lol...yeah, and about 15-20% of people didn't spend the bulk of their lives in the fields in a dominantly agrarian society. Obviously, pistols weren't as commonplace as we saw in the late 19th century or even today, because firearms weren't as advanced, but our legal system was built, and then refined, in eras when the right to self-defense wasn't debatable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 Shoot…we definitely don’t need him as a Punter, but maybe he wants to be a PK now. He did have some solid numbers doing that at SDSU: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshumak2 Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 3 minutes ago, titanskick8851 said: Shoot…we definitely don’t need him as a Punter, but maybe he wants to be a PK now. He did have some solid numbers doing that at SDSU: The downward trajectory in fg% is somewhat troubling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
titanskick8851 Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 Just now, cshumak2 said: The downward trajectory in fg% is somewhat troubling Was also full time punting. His XP% was excellent though. It’s worth bringing him in and see if he can do it. If he can, you might have the strongest tandem of legs in the NFL with him and Stonehouse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshumak2 Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, titanskick8851 said: Was also full time punting. His XP% was excellent though. It’s worth bringing him in and see if he can do it. If he can, you might have the strongest tandem of legs in the NFL with him and Stonehouse. I'm not necessarily against it. Just wouldn't expect much in the fg department. Would be glad to be proven wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 3 hours ago, IowaOiler said: I don't give two shits what you're 'all for.' You consistently try to drive every post into politics so you can condescend to those that think you're wrong. Again, stop lying about what I post. I didn’t mention a goddamned thing about politics in this thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abenjami Posted May 11, 2023 Report Share Posted May 11, 2023 On 5/8/2023 at 7:31 PM, Starkiller said: He basically just had to take 1 year off of football to deal with a legal issue and now he will come back with a clean record. His reputation isn’t ruined. LOL this is laughable but not surprising coming from one of the posters who lambasted this guy in the original thread when he was initially accused. He signed a 4 year deal for $3.8 million and only saw $200k of it because he was cut due to the false allegations. Also, why the new thread instead of putting this news with the old thread so we can see all the idiots who jumped to the wrong conclusion about this guy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.