Jump to content

2023 WR draft analysis


Jmac959

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, tgo said:

With Cleveland trading for Moore- that takes them out of the running for Jeudy. 
 

The asking price for Jeudy is a high 2nd plus a player or conditional pick. 
 

How about our 2nd plus Derrick Henry for Jeudy? 

No

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 658
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Titans need three WR’s and two TE’s and looks like their FA is done minus backups/depth pieces.  So I do not see how they do not pick a WR round one and another round 2-3 and a TE as well at minimum 

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, tgo said:

With Cleveland trading for Moore- that takes them out of the running for Jeudy. 
 

The asking price for Jeudy is a high 2nd plus a player or conditional pick. 
 

How about our 2nd plus Derrick Henry for Jeudy? 

After watching all of your scenarios in this particular off-season all I can say is...

rudy-clapping.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, tgo said:

With Cleveland trading for Moore- that takes them out of the running for Jeudy. 
 

The asking price for Jeudy is a high 2nd plus a player or conditional pick. 
 

How about our 2nd plus Derrick Henry for Jeudy? 

 

Honestly, why would Sean Payton want Derrick Henry?  Doesn't fit his offense one bit,

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, IsntLifeFunny said:

No, as a closer and a guy who split carries. He did the same with Deuce McCallister before Ingram. You're completely wrong saying he doesn't fit Payton's offense. 

 

Henry isn't a split carry back though and he's more limited as a receiver than Ingram was.  He's far more likely to trade for a guy like Ekelier or Kamara type than a Henry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BudsOilers said:

 

Henry isn't a split carry back though and he's more limited as a receiver than Ingram was.  He's far more likely to trade for a guy like Ekelier or Kamara type than a Henry.

It's simply a bad argument and discussing what he's more likely to do has nothing to do with the fact he fits the offense. Just because he's never split carries doesn't mean he can't. That's a fallacy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...