WG53 Posted January 29, 2022 Report Share Posted January 29, 2022 57 minutes ago, Little Earl said: Dumb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted January 30, 2022 Report Share Posted January 30, 2022 On 1/28/2022 at 10:30 PM, Little Earl said: Why didn't Trump nominate a Black woman? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsntLifeFunny Posted January 30, 2022 Report Share Posted January 30, 2022 1 hour ago, luvyablue256 said: Why didn't Trump nominate a Black woman? He would have won the election if he did lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted January 31, 2022 Report Share Posted January 31, 2022 hmmmm. pass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted January 31, 2022 Report Share Posted January 31, 2022 1 hour ago, Titans279 said: hmmmm. pass. Hard pass. Nominate Childs and get it over with. She'll have no less than 54 votes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luvyablue256 Posted January 31, 2022 Report Share Posted January 31, 2022 Again, Manchin's value is on stuff like judicial appointments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgsTitan Posted February 5, 2022 Report Share Posted February 5, 2022 I can't believe Wikipedia would allow this. Unfortunately, it's where most people go for biographical information. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/02/04/former-clerk-rewrites-supreme-court-wikipedia-bios-00005914 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted February 7, 2022 Report Share Posted February 7, 2022 Clyburn needs to slow his roll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted February 9, 2022 Report Share Posted February 9, 2022 On 2/7/2022 at 5:10 PM, Titans279 said: Clyburn needs to slow his roll Clyburn gets on my nerves sometimes. I’m fine with Childs but prefer Jackson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted February 20, 2022 Report Share Posted February 20, 2022 On 1/26/2022 at 11:58 AM, El Guapo said: Why limit potential candidates by race and gender? Seems racist and potentially eliminates liberal intelligent judges. I mean Sotomayor has already proven that race and ethnicity doesnt mean insightful, intellect, or consensus building. Lord have mercy, how do you guys put up with him? Since the formation of the Court in 1790, there have been only 17 Chief Justices* and 103 Associate Justices, with Justices serving for an average of 16 years. There have been two justices labeled as BLACK human males and four females labeled as WHITE humans. El G asks "Why limit potential candidates by race and gender?" duh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number9 Posted February 20, 2022 Report Share Posted February 20, 2022 On 2/7/2022 at 5:10 PM, Titans279 said: Clyburn needs to slow his roll I think you need to follow the money trail on a lot of long term reps who have huge war chests and represent extremely gerrymandered poor districts. See map. He represents Savannah, Charleston and Columbia, South Carolina. Map. https://www.congress.gov/member/district/james-clyburn/C000537 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgo Posted February 22, 2022 Report Share Posted February 22, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitansPDO Posted February 25, 2022 Report Share Posted February 25, 2022 https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/25/politics/supreme-court-ketanji-brown-jackson/index.html Jackson is the pick. A former federal public defender, and a person who did great work when reforming some of the federal sentencing guidelines, she is a terrific choice in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titans279 Posted February 25, 2022 Report Share Posted February 25, 2022 Lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.