Jump to content

Tracking Offensive Fallout - Week 17


Jamalisms

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mythos27 said:

Everyone with a brain has correctly argued that the offensive fall out had more to do with the receivers being out and the OL being bad. 

 

 

This isnt correct. You, oldschool and majority of the tannehill fanboys claimed this, that doesnt make "everyone" on the board. 

 

4 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

 That's a separate argument. 

? Go tell that to the poster that brought in the recieving core statement in a offensive fall out weekly that was meant to track the data without Henry if it makes you sleep a little better?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Mythos27 said:

Far as I can tell even the intent is to "disprove" something that threatens the agenda. 

 

If it actually disproves the point, who has the agenda and who has the facts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

What are you saying? The claim was that he's including AJ because people asked for it but I don't remember anyone asking for it. Saying that AJ is more important than Henry is not the same as literally asking someone to do anything. He just felt the need to do it because he didn't like how people saying that took away from his Henry stance. Further evidence of what this thread is really about.

 

You know I'm right on this, you just don't care because you think it serves you. At least be honest and admit where this is coming from. And I'm not being vitriolic, I'm asking you questions that you can't answer without revealing you know I'm right so you feel attacked. If multiple people really asked him to do this then list them and shut me up. 

 

It was posted last week in the thread and people and had been posted it in other threads as well, referencing how these threads have been disproven. When it was posted last week, I updated the thread with the AJ breakout next to the Henry breakout ... and then did it again this week.

 

Perhaps the problem is you aren't paying attention? Maybe know what you're talking about before you start yelling about agendas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Mythos27I usually agree with you on these things, but @Jamalismsis correct when there have been others stating AJB makes a bigger difference.  Maybe no one said specifically to do the break out, but if Jamal wanted to do the breakdown,  no harm.

As usual, it is how people choose to interpret the information is where the agendas shine through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

@Mythos27I usually agree with you on these things, but @Jamalismsis correct when there have been others stating AJB makes a bigger difference.  Maybe no one said specifically to do the break out, but if Jamal wanted to do the breakdown,  no harm.

As usual, it is how people choose to interpret the information is where the agendas shine through.

Jamal isn't the one who made the claim that he's only doing it because people asked him. That was Russ; the person I was actually talking to. @OILERMANsaid the AJ additions were pointless (feel free to agree to disagree) and Russ decided to chime in on Jamal's behalf that he started doing it because people asked for it, which is a lie. I then asked him to name the people who asked for it and he failed to name a single poster. It's all pretty straightforward.

 

Everyone knows what this thread is about. People push narratives on this board all the time but when you deny it and pretend you're just dispassionately tracking data it's insulting to everyone's intelligence. He's aiming to prove a narrative that died when significant injuries outside of Henry occurred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mythos27 said:

Jamal isn't the one who made the claim that he's only doing it because people asked him. That was Russ; the person I was actually talking to. @OILERMANsaid the AJ additions were pointless (feel free to agree to disagree) and Russ decided to chime in on Jamal's behalf that he started doing it because people asked for it, which is a lie. I then asked him to name the people who asked for it and he failed to name a single poster. It's all pretty straightforward.

 

Everyone knows what this thread is about. People push narratives on this board all the time but when you deny it and pretend you're just dispassionately tracking data it's insulting to everyone's intelligence. He's aiming to prove a narrative that died when significant injuries outside of Henry occurred.

I agree that just posting overall data and attributing it to 2 players is worthless. For anyone's agenda.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LongTimeFan said:

I agree that just posting overall data and attributing it to 2 players is worthless. For anyone's agenda.

 

And if these other guys agreed this thread would not exist. I admit that I too was interested in what this offense would look like missing just Henry. It was a bit of a silver lining to get a nice 1:1 comparison so in that spirit this thread made sense but once it became clear that we were losing way more than just Henry it became pointless yet here we are. The opportunity for a nice 1:1 comparison evaporated too quickly to make the determination that Henry's loss alone accounted for what we were seeing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jamalisms said:

 

It was posted last week in the thread and people and had been posted it in other threads as well, referencing how these threads have been disproven. When it was posted last week, I updated the thread with the AJ breakout next to the Henry breakout ... and then did it again this week.

 

Perhaps the problem is you aren't paying attention? Maybe know what you're talking about before you start yelling about agendas?

Jamal, stop. It's too transparent. No one is falling for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mythos27 said:

What are you saying? The claim was that he's including AJ because people asked for it but I don't remember anyone asking for it. Saying that AJ is more important than Henry is not the same as literally asking someone to do anything. He just felt the need to do it because he didn't like how people saying that took away from his Henry stance. Further evidence of what this thread is really about.

 

You know I'm right on this, you just don't care because you think it serves you. At least be honest and admit where this is coming from. And I'm not being vitriolic, I'm asking you questions that you can't answer without revealing you know I'm right so you feel attacked. If multiple people really asked him to do this then list them and shut me up. 

Lol...

Right on what? that people didn't say Aj was more important( including yourself)? That people specifically in this thread asked for it? ... or that people specifically asked for it elsewhere? 
 

why does this topic piss you off so much? 
mask yourself why you are so invested if it doesn't matter? 
 

He simply put up a stat that proved something other than you and your consensus said HAD to be true. 

if you want to go back through 4-5 weeks of every post mentioning AJ brown... go right at it. But I do not feel like diving into every posters autistic semantic arguments when they are proven wrong on the whole. I just don't give a damn.
 

Ya look bad here.. and arguing about semantics on why a stat was posted rather than the answers the stat shows just makes you look worse. Like a naked bank robber shaming people for looking at them. 
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, titanruss said:

Lol...

Right on what? that people didn't say Aj was more important( including yourself)? That people specifically in this thread asked for it? ... or that people specifically asked for it elsewhere? 
 

why does this topic piss you off so much? 
mask yourself why you are so invested if it doesn't matter? 
 

He simply put up a stat that proved something other than you and your consensus said HAD to be true. 

if you want to go back through 4-5 weeks of every post mentioning AJ brown... go right at it. But I do not feel like diving into every posters autistic semantic arguments when they are proven wrong on the whole. I just don't give a damn.
 

Ya look bad here.. and arguing about semantics on why a stat was posted rather than the answers the stat shows just makes you look worse. Like a naked bank robber shaming people for looking at them. 
 

 

No one is angry. I'm just very clearly pointing out how you lied. 

 

You: people asked him to track this.

 

Me: show me who.

 

*Fails to name a single person*

 

You: Why are you so angry!?

 

I'm not pissed, I just cornered you and you have nothing else to say. It's been happening a lot lately. I don't "look bad" to people who actually know what they're watching so trust me buddy I'm not worried. The fact that you're concerned how other people look is hilarious. Worry about how you look because you've looked retarded on every major issue for a while now.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

No one is angry. I'm just very clearly pointing out how you lied. 

 

You: people asked him to track this.

 

Me: show me who.

 

*Fails to name a single person*

 

You: Why are you so angry!?

 

I'm not pissed, I just cornered you and you have nothing else to say. It's been happening a lot lately. I don't "look bad" to people who actually know what they're watching so trust me buddy I'm not worried. The fact that you're concerned how other people look is hilarious. Worry about how you look because you've looked retarded on every major issue for a while now.

 

 

Cornered me how? I lied how?

 

People: "AJ Browns absense is more important the DH"

 

Jamal: Ok here you go.

 

Mythos: uh soo stupid.

 

Russ: well you asked for it

 

Mythos: nuh uh i didnt! dont look a the stats either!

 

Russ: you literally said someone else was more important stat wise and Jamal posted the stats for visibility.

 

Mythos: where did I SAY I want to be publically embarassed

 

Russ: I really dont have time for your childish semantic bullshit today

 

Mythos: SEE LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE.

 

 

grow up. you were proven wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mythos27 said:

No one is angry. I'm just very clearly pointing out how you lied. 

 

You: people asked him to track this.

 

Me: show me who.

 

*Fails to name a single person*

 

You: Why are you so angry!?

 

I'm not pissed, I just cornered you and you have nothing else to say. It's been happening a lot lately. I don't "look bad" to people who actually know what they're watching so trust me buddy I'm not worried. The fact that you're concerned how other people look is hilarious. Worry about how you look because you've looked retarded on every major issue for a while now.

 

Dude really? You're honestly going on about this? How IRONIC....

 

 

HOW DARE JAMAL posts stats of AJBs after multiple users claimed AJ Clowns absence was much important than King Hendry. Damn you AGENDA DRIVEN GUYS!!!!!!

 

 

PS

 

You're 'gotcha' thingy didnt work with this one. You want to try again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Mythos27 ...when someone punches you in the face for grabbing their girls ass and then says you were asking for it...

 

do you say "LIAR!!!! I did not specifically say for you to punch me in the face!!!"??

 

to continue down your tangents that you think validates you in someway for being wrong elsewhere....

 

The entire thread last week starts with the discussion on wether or not AJ Brown is more important to the offense.

 

this pic is from a different thread.

 

1146085261_ScreenShot2022-01-06at13_45_54.png.6e285d74014bb883e48c19936941be73.png

this is from week 15 thread on the same shit....941884113_ScreenShot2022-01-06at14_03_20.png.4c89e89d92900acf23b0dec2a00e78a1.png

 

oh.. and boom goes the dynamite... fuck yeself.

 

love you bro, toodles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...