Starkiller Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 2 hours ago, SNAPHISANKLE said: Here’s a doozy of a hypothetical you have to replace tannehill OR Henry, definite top 5 guys at their position respectively, with a guy ranked like 16 at that position. keep one and replace one with an average player. anyone brave enough to answer? for me I keep tannehill all day. Starting caliber RBs aren’t hard to find. Good QBs are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
socaltitan Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 4 minutes ago, Starkiller said: Starting caliber RBs aren’t hard to find. Good QBs are. It’s hard to find starting RB like Henry though. He has rare attributes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkiller Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 1 minute ago, socaltitan said: It’s hard to find starting RB like Henry though. He has rare attributes. you don’t need a RB like Henry to win though. You need a top QB. You need Mahomes or Brady or Wilson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizzyeddie Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 13 hours ago, abenjami said: No one is calling Henry an easily replaceable cog. There are those who think he is...they aren't saying it after yesterdays game but they will again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieTitanFan08 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeFan Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 7 hours ago, scine09 said: The final drive of regulation took place with Henry on the bench. That should say it all. Well Henry was the main focus in the OT. Should that say it all too? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Just now, LongTimeFan said: Well Henry was the main focus in the OT. Should that say it all too? Come on. There's not even a comparison of who is more important. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 6 minutes ago, scine09 said: Come on. There's not even a comparison of who is more important. It's true but you gotta admit that LTF's point directly rebuts yours. I actually didn't even consider that. Ryan is more important because QB dwarfs everything. Henry is better at his position right now when compared to the rest of the league BUT Tannehill is nipping at his heels and the gap was never large at all. I can't even get worked up over this stupid "debate" because I remember when our starters were Jake Locker and Bishop Sankey. Now we have a top 3 QB and top 3 RB. Gentlemen, we are truly blessed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Just now, Mythos27 said: It's true but you gotta admit that LTF's point directly rebuts yours. I actually didn't even consider that. Ryan is more important because QB dwarfs everything. Henry is better at his position right now when compared to the rest of the league BUT Tannehill is nipping at his heels and the gap was never large at all. I can't even get worked up over this stupid "debate" because I remember when our starters were Jake Locker and Bishop Sankey. Now we have a top 3 QB and top 3 RB. Gentlemen, we are truly blessed. Top 3 QB might be stretching it. Granted the #s do support that. I STILL feel like though that people think that Tannehill is a game manager and only putting up #s because of Henry. And it's simply not true. He had a game last year when he put up 28 with Henry not playing. Yeah they lost but not because of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 1 minute ago, scine09 said: Top 3 QB might be stretching it. Granted the #s do support that. I STILL feel like though that people think that Tannehill is a game manager and only putting up #s because of Henry. And it's simply not true. He had a game last year when he put up 28 with Henry not playing. Yeah they lost but not because of him. I believe the technical term for those people is "fucking morons". We don't worry about them. Their opinion will change as the national narrative surrounding Tannehill changes. The dunces need to be told what to think for a little longer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scine09 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 3 minutes ago, Mythos27 said: I believe the technical term for those people is "fucking morons". We don't worry about them. Their opinion will change as the national narrative surrounding Tannehill changes. The dunces need to be told what to think for a little longer. I kind of wish Logical hadn't been blocked to hear his excuses for Tannehill's performance yesterday. I'm sure the amount of TDs he threw would have been cut in at least half in his mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mythos27 Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Just now, scine09 said: I kind of wish Logical hadn't been blocked to hear his excuses for Tannehill's performance yesterday. I'm sure the amount of TDs he threw would have been cut in at least half in his mind. We know what he would say. He's a pure troll. I kept telling y'all the only way to make his stay enjoyable was to not expect any substance and just ruthlessly shit on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizzyeddie Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 12 minutes ago, scine09 said: Top 3 QB might be stretching it. Granted the #s do support that. I STILL feel like though that people think that Tannehill is a game manager and only putting up #s because of Henry. And it's simply not true. He had a game last year when he put up 28 with Henry not playing. Yeah they lost but not because of him. I don't think many people feel that way. But I also don't think people understand we win the saints game with Henry. ( Assuming that s the game your talking about) Same with yesterday.. tannehill probably has a great game but he loses to Watson without Henry. Just like he lost to Brees without Henry. QB is the most important piece but championship teams need pieces like Henry and AJ on offense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinsFan_VBCheese Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 Was thinking maybe there was some hyperbole about Henry getting all the credit, but NOPE. Looking around the interwebs last night, it's as if Tannehill never had a game tying drive of beauty, let alone 4TDs and 300+. Props to Henry and the way he handles it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StephenIsLegend Posted October 19, 2020 Report Share Posted October 19, 2020 12 minutes ago, bizzyeddie said: I don't think many people feel that way. But I also don't think people understand we win the saints game with Henry. ( Assuming that s the game your talking about) Same with yesterday.. tannehill probably has a great game but he loses to Watson without Henry. Just like he lost to Brees without Henry. QB is the most important piece but championship teams need pieces like Henry and AJ on offense. You're wrong in this. Henry is fantastic, but without Tannehill, we lose pretty decisively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.